7 Views
2013 Acura RDX Revealed: 2012 Chicago Auto Show
by
Derek Kreindler
(IC: employee)
Published: February 7th, 2012
Share
Acura showed off their 2013 RDX, featuring a 3.5L V6 with 33 more horsepower than the outgoing model and substantially improved fuel economy.
At 273 horsepower and MPG ratings of 20/28 mpg for the front-driver and 19/27 mpg AWD version, quantitative performance is up for Acura’s small crossover. Pandora Radio, an ELS sound system, a power liftgate and a longer wheelbase/wider track are the big news for 2013. We’ll have more information tomorrow when our team starts live coverage of the Chicago Auto Show.
Derek Kreindler
More by Derek Kreindler
Published February 7th, 2012 8:20 PM
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- MaintenanceCosts It's not a Benz or a Jag / it's a 5-0 with a rag /And I don't wanna brag / but I could never be stag
- 3-On-The-Tree Son has a 2016 Mustang GT 5.0 and I have a 2009 C6 Corvette LS3 6spd. And on paper they are pretty close.
- 3-On-The-Tree Same as the Land Cruiser, emissions. I have a 1985 FJ60 Land Cruiser and it’s a beast off-roading.
- CanadaCraig I would like for this anniversary special to be a bare-bones Plain-Jane model offered in Dynasty Green and Vintage Burgundy.
- ToolGuy Ford is good at drifting all right... 😉
Comments
Join the conversation
The comments here on the RDX and on the ILX post are pretty brutal. It's almost like Acura could not do anything right regardless of the attempts. If the ILX and RDX had all the features discussed, the price would be high and the complaint would be that Acura cannot complete with "Tier 1" luxury. Keep the price down, and the complaints are poor engine choices, just a Civic/CRV/Honda with leather, etc. I makes me wonder if Acura is simply a damaged brand.
CUV's and SUV's certainly bring the worst out of 4-cyl powertrains lifted from their sedan counterparts; with the added weight and wind resistance, they perform poorly (especially in hilly terrain), and suck more fuel (and the EPA tests seem to not take these factors fully into account). Add AWD, and you have a formula for disappointment.