Rent, Lease, Sell, or Deport: 2002 Chevy Tracker 4WD

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

Like small SUV’s, the small towns of the South have a bit of a split personality. On one side of the brain are the transients. They generally don’t care who you want to marry, whether you own a firearm or not. Or what political party you favor. They are here for the (few) jobs and the cheap real estate.

The you have the Bible belt ‘conservative’ with a big old silver confederate belt buckle in the middle. The ‘Good Old Boys’ liked things just fine before their town became known and sure as heck don’t want anything to change now. Their ideology is right wing, family focused, and you can take it or leave it.

They are genuinely nice to you.. so long as you’re not too weird.

But if you’re too much of a drag on business, weirdo, the door does swing both ways. Much the same way as the door ended up swinging both ways for this Chevy Tracker.

Rent: The Tracker was to Chevy what an unemployed transient is to the ‘traditional’ south. A challenge to assimilate. But a welcome addition if it finds it’s niche. Unfortunately the Tracker stood out in a traditional Chevy showroom in 2002 about as well as a gay pride parade did back then in Cumming, Georgia.

Dealers hated the thing. It was small and expensive in a market where customers still wanted ‘big’ along with a volume discount to boot. By the late 90’s, the Tracker’s sales had nosedived more than three quarters from their Geo peak and never found a second wind.

If I rented this vehicle it would be $175 a week. That sounds good in theory. But I wonder if I can do better.

Lease: Financing this vehicle may be a more secure investment. A $700 down payment and $65 a week for 24 months may add up to less than a long-term rental status. But then again you have a solitary owner with a financial stake in the vehicle instead of multiple bodies hammering away at the powertrain.

Sell: A ZR2 model with 4WD and 105k would go for around $4500. Maybe even $5000 if I find the right buyer in the mountains of North Georgia or Tennessee. Small SUV’s tend to do very well in that region and based on my Autotrader results, there doesn’t seem to be many out there to choose from.

However there’s a reason for that.

Deport: A 4WD compact SUV is pure gold in Costa Rica along with a few other Central American countries. Tariffs are stiff. But a small, well kept Tracker with all the options and reasonable mileage would still sell for around double the price it gets in the states.

Then there is another recent purchase to consider. I just happened to find a 1st generation Toyota RAV4 with 90k miles the other day. It’s also a clean compact SUV. So why not take the family on a ‘selling’ vacation? I still can speak Spanglish quite well after all these years and nothing would be better for the Lang Gang than fleeing from this endless gray winter.

So what should it be? Rent it to some good old boys and their progeny. Finance it to someone who will hopefully turn out to be a saintly soul behind the wheel. Sell it for the quick buck. Or take it out to a place that plays limbo with the equator.

What says you?

Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 21 comments
  • St1100boy St1100boy on Jan 12, 2012

    My wife drove an '02 Tracker 4-dr ZR2 for 50k miles and close to 3 years. It was super reliable. Not a single problem the whole time. Very easy to park and good visibility to boot. Too bad it sucked fuel (21 mpg highway, on a good day), was a bit slow, and made for a rough, loud highway ride. She really didn't need 4X4 capability, so she traded it on a Pontiac Vibe and was much happier overall. She says she still misses the ZR2, but she can't even say why.

  • Andy D Andy D on Jan 15, 2012

    My BIL had a 90 something Tracker with a 3 speed auto and something like 5.10 diffs. It rode rough. but compared well to a baby jeep of the same vintage. If I wasn't so invested in old BMWs, I would be into Suzukis.

    • Steve65 Steve65 on Jan 15, 2012

      I test drove an automatic when I bought my 94. I can't imagine being willing to own it with one. The damned thing was hunting between gears just driving down a straight flat road. Far as I know, they all had the 5.10 gears. I know mine does. 4wd/5 speed. Low range first gear, it will creep along so slowly I could easily jump out, run around it, and jump back in (not that I ever tried). It actually made a decent commute vehicle in slow and go traffic. It would pull cleanly from idle in 2nd gear, so I'd just roll along while all the other fools would rush up to the car ahead, slam on the brakes, rinse/repeat.

  • Philip I love seeing these stories regarding concepts that I have vague memories of from collector magazines, books, etc (usually by the esteemed Richard Langworth who I credit for most of my car history knowledge!!!). On a tangent here, I remember reading Lee Iacocca's autobiography in the late 1980s, and being impressed, though on a second reading, my older and self realized why Henry Ford II must have found him irritating. He took credit for and boasted about everything successful being his alone, and sidestepped anything that was unsuccessful. Although a very interesting about some of the history of the US car industry from the 1950s through the 1980s, one needs to remind oneself of the subjective recounting in this book. Iacocca mentioned Henry II's motto "Never complain; never explain" which is basically the M.O. of the Royal Family, so few heard his side of the story. I first began to question Iacocca's rationale when he calls himself "The Father of the Mustang". He even said how so many people have taken credit for the Mustang that he would hate to be seen in public with the mother. To me, much of the Mustang's success needs to be credited to the DESIGNER Joe Oros. If the car did not have that iconic appearance, it wouldn't have become an icon. Of course accounting (making it affordable), marketing (identifying and understanding the car's market) and engineering (building a car from a Falcon base to meet the cost and marketing goals) were also instrumental, as well as Iacocca's leadership....but truth be told, I don't give him much credit at all. If he did it all, it would have looked as dowdy as a 1980s K-car. He simply did not grasp car style and design like a Bill Mitchell or John Delorean at GM. Hell, in the same book he claims credit for the Brougham era four-door Thunderbird with landau bars (ugh) and putting a "Rolls-Royce grille" on the Continental Mark III. Interesting ideas, but made the cars look chintzy, old-fashioned and pretentious. Dean Martin found them cool as "Matt Helm" in the late 1960s, but he was already well into middle age by then. It's hard not to laugh at these cartoon vehicles.
  • Dwford The real crime is not bringing this EV to the US (along with the Jeep Avenger EV)
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Another Hyunkia'sis? 🙈
  • SCE to AUX "Hyundai told us that perhaps he or she is a performance enthusiast who is EV hesitant."I'm not so sure. If you're 'EV hesitant', you're not going to jump into a $66k performance car for your first EV experience, especially with its compromised range. Unless this car is purchased as a weekend toy, which perhaps Hyundai is describing.Quite the opposite, I think this car is for a 2nd-time EV buyer (like me*) who understands what they're getting into. Even the Model 3 Performance is a less overt track star.*But since I have no interest in owning a performance car, this one wouldn't be for me. A heavily-discounted standard Ioniq 5 (or 6) would be fine.Tim - When you say the car is longer and wider, is that achieved with cladding changes, or metal (like the Raptor)?
  • JMII I doubt Hyundai would spend the development costs without having some idea of a target buyer.As an occasional track rat myself I can't imagine such a buyer exists. Nearly $70k nets you a really good track toy especially on the used market. This seems like a bunch of gimmicks applied to a decent hot hatch EV that isn't going to impression anyone given its badge. Normally I'd cheer such a thing but it seems silly. Its almost like they made this just for fun. That is awesome and I appreciate it but given the small niche I gotta think the development time, money and effort should have been focused elsewhere. Something more mainstream? Or is this Hyundai's attempt at some kind of halo sports car?Also seems Hyundai never reviles sales targets so its hard to judge successful products in their line up. I wonder how brutal depreciation will be on these things. In two years at $40k this would a total hoot.So no active dampers on this model?
Next