Babysitting Bloggers: How GM, Ford, Audi and Others Are Twisting The Coverage You're Reading

Jack Baruth
by Jack Baruth

We all ran by them this morning on the way to the Fusion introduction. Two signs. One sign said, “FORD PRESS EVENT”. The sign below it said “SOCIAL MEDIA INFLUENCERS”. The arrow pointed a different way. Who are “social media influencers”, anyway?

What was the “Volt Lounge”, and why were so many prominent auto-related Twitterati spending time there today instead of walking the NAIAS show floor?

The photo above is a plane that reportedly left Detroit tonight. Why did Audi reportedly feel the need to fly dozens of bloggers from NAIAS to CES, at their expense?

We’ve complained about this on TTAC before, but on a day where we have seen so many newsworthy new cars, it’s important to remind all of you that a lot of the “news” is bought and paid for. General Motors and Ford both spent obscene amounts of money to fly “social media influencers” to Detroit from all over the world. The way these bloggers experience Detroit is very different from the way the TTAC crew did. They are herded from place to place, given talking points, and relentlessly groomed to Tweet and blog only the most flattering and sponsor-centric information. “Insider events” make sure that the GM bloggers, for example, didn’t see the plug-in Fusion — and the Ford bloggers were nowhere in evidence when the new Hyundais hit the ground. Instead, a group of mostly young, handsome, and gregarious PR people ensure that only the most profitable news reaches the ears of their impressionable charges.

Meanwhile, Audi apparently chartered an entire Boeing 737 to make sure “lifestyle” bloggers went straight from the new Q3 Vail to the newest disposable electronic garbage in Vegas. Lincoln’s introducing the new MKZ in the morning, and it’s aimed right at the Audi A4 — but for the Audi charter crew, that car’s invisible. Meanwhile, Ford’s blogger babies will be Tweeting Revolutionary Em Kay Zee News All Morning. It’s modern American politics writ in automotive steel: ignore the contrasting choices, pick a team, be loyal rather than curious.

As we did last year, TTAC is calling on all compensated bloggers to trumpet that fact loud and clear at the BEGINNING of their coverage, not in a italicized end disclaimer. If your view of the world’s most important auto show was through a marketing glass darkly, let your followers know.

Now it’s time for the TTAC team disclaimers:

  • Jack Baruth drove a Lincoln Town Car with 73,920 miles to the event. He accepted no alcohol or food from manufacturers and paid his own bills.
  • Ronnie Schreiber paid his own way and is a native Detroiter.
  • The Speed:Sport:Life crew flew from Houston, TX and Washington, DC at their own expense, paid their own way, and did not accept any manufacturer benefits on Day One of the show while covering the event for TTAC.
  • Derek Kreindler stayed home in Toronto because his girlfriend is gorgeous and he didn’t want to play pickup ball.
  • Bertel Schmitt monitored our activity from the secret Chinese moon base nearest internet cafe.

Who paid for the coverage you are reading? You did, by clicking on all those great ads. What? You haven’t clicked on an ad? Get clicking!

Jack Baruth
Jack Baruth

More by Jack Baruth

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 41 comments
  • Daveainchina Daveainchina on Jan 10, 2012

    "Who paid for the coverage you are reading? You did, by clicking on all those great ads. What? You haven’t clicked on an ad? Get clicking!" Best promo ever to get people to click on ads they aren't interested in. So a question to you Jack, if I'm say a "ford guy"(insert any manufacturers name here) and all I do is blog and post in forums about fords, would I really be guilty for not showing curiosity from a competing brand? Should I disclose that ford paid for my trip, sure, but I don't think I should be roasted for ignoring everything else but fords etc? Normally I agree with you, but I have to wonder who these people are who are "social media influencers"

  • Jsal56 Jsal56 on Jan 10, 2012

    Jack, This article is why, if you are ever in NYC, you can name your restaurant. When I read what what Porsche has been doing a light finally dawned on my marblehead. Thanks for the great work.

  • Dwford I don't think price is the real issue. Plenty of people buy $40-50k gas vehicles every year. It's the functionality. People are worried about range and the ability to easily and quickly recharge. Also, if you want to buy an EV these days, you are mostly limited to midsize 5 passenger crossovers. How about some body style variety??
  • SCE to AUX The nose went from terrible to weird.
  • Chris P Bacon I'm not a fan of either, but if I had to choose, it would be the RAV. It's built for the long run with a NA engine and an 8 speed transmission. The Honda with a turbo and CVT might still last as long, but maintenance is going to cost more to get to 200000 miles for sure. The Honda is built for the first owner to lease and give back in 36 months. The Toyota is built to own and pass down.
  • Dwford Ford's management change their plans like they change their underwear. Where were all the prototypes of the larger EVs that were supposed to come out next year? Or for the next gen EV truck? Nowhere to be seen. Now those vaporware models are on the back burner to pursue cheaper models. Yeah, ok.
  • Wjtinfwb My comment about "missing the mark" was directed at, of the mentioned cars, none created huge demand or excitement once they were introduced. All three had some cool aspects; Thunderbird was pretty good exterior, let down by the Lincoln LS dash and the fairly weak 3.9L V8 at launch. The Prowler was super cool and unique, only the little nerf bumpers spoiled the exterior and of course the V6 was a huge letdown. SSR had the beans, but in my opinion was spoiled by the tonneau cover over the bed. Remove the cover, finish the bed with some teak or walnut and I think it could have been more appealing. All three were targeting a very small market (expensive 2-seaters without a prestige badge) which probably contributed. The PT Cruiser succeeded in this space by being both more practical and cheap. Of the three, I'd still like to have a Thunderbird in my garage in a classic color like the silver/green metallic offered in the later years.
Next