Junkyard Find: 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Calais International Series

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

In 1990, you could give your BMW salesman $24,650 and drive off the lot in a 325i coupe weighing 2,811 pounds and equipped with a 168-horsepower engine and 5-speed transmission… or you could hand $14,895 to your Oldsmobile salesman and drive off the lot in a Cutlass Calais International Series coupe weighing 2,823 pounds and equiped with a 160-horsepower engine and 5-speed transmission. Ten grand more for rear-wheel-drive, eight more horses, 12 fewer pounds, and a blue-and-white hood emblem? I had forgotten all about the Quad 4-powered Cutlass Calais International Series until I ran across this forlorn example in a California self-service wrecking yard last week.

Granted, the N Platform- based Cutlass Calais wasn’t quite as handsome as the ’90 E30, and the build quality wasn’t quite up to Bavarian standards, but this Olds was a pretty good bang-for-buck deal.

The idea of an Oldsmobile with a DOHC 4-valve engine and 5-speed transmission does seem strange, even after nearly a decade since The General axed its ancient division.

It’s got leather. It’s got an auto-reverse cassette deck. It’s got that goofy globe-surrounded-by-flags emblem on every possible surface, including the trunk lock. And now it’s all getting crushed and shipped to China.

Another GM dream that didn’t quite work out as the marketing guys planned.


We’ll show that Oldsmobiles are really for young buyers… by showing a 100-year-old man disappointed in his 74-year-old son for buying such a sporty car.







Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 101 comments
  • OldsGuy89 OldsGuy89 on May 02, 2012

    I'm not interested in arguing with you either. But even in trying to clarify your earlier statement, you still can't keep from being insulting, derisive, and condescending. Amazing. I know my Cutlass Calais isn't a world-beater. It's not some candy colored supercar, won't go 200 mph, won't ever be featured in a magazine with a bikini clad girl draped on her hood, etc. I will grant you all those things, but that doesn't make it crap. I can't speak for the rest of the Calais that were built, but the one I have is solid. It has performed reliably, efficiently and comfortably for many years, and it shows no signs of stopping. For lack of a better word, that old car simply wants to live. You have to respect that. A crap car doesn't rack up over 327,000 miles. Call me whatever names you want, you won't change that fact. No need to respond. I won't be posting here anymore, and you'll just insult me or the car again anyway. Good luck to you.

  • DreadPirateDoc DreadPirateDoc on May 24, 2012

    Hey OldsGuy89 you have a nice ride there. My favorite car was my 1991 Olds Calais International in bright red. They came with four exhausts what were at the time huge wheels (16 inch polycast factory custom) custon vinyl body molding with a cateye reflective white stripe for the red ones and a nice powerful roar when you pressed the pedal. Mine did a respectable 112 miles per hour on the autobahn before the speed chip kicked it out I always wondered what my true top speed would have been without that little "feature". And it did all of this while getting 32 miles to the gallon. I loved that car until the day some idiot rammed it dead while it sat in a parking lot. It was not the same as the buick and pontiac vehicles for the nice leather trimmed interior. In warrantee alone it far surpassed the other quad four cars. When my engine needed a new head gasket at 65,000 miles the dealership showed me a buick that was in for the same repair at 55,000 miles and pointed out that mine would be covered by the warrantee but the Buick would be on the owner to pay for. Overall my Little red oldsmobile was the best car I have ever owned. Don't be disheartened by the sour grapes comments of some people. It is the nature of the internet to tear things down. People will pile on statements about how loud a car was that they never entered and tell you how there was a special edition car available in limited edition that was slightly better in their opinion than yours is. If only such a car had actually been for sale in a location you lived that might have made some sense but really they didn't buy that car either and who wants to pay for posche, ferrari, lamborgini insurance to get eight more horsepower? Don't let others get you down for liking your car. In the end it doesn't matter what they read on the internet you have driven the car and know about the XM-1 learning automatic transmission that shifted like a dream. You know about the smooth thrill of the muted harmonic roar of a quad four when accelerating. You know about the torque band that was solid as a rock allowing you to choose any speed on your cruise control and never see the speedo drop and rise more than one MPH when going through hills and mountains. You know how it doesn't lose traction in a curve even on ice. and virtually cannot be stuck in snow. In short you know you have a good car and it is your car and they can just do the sour grapes thing all day for themselves for nothing because they can't have one at any price. Enjoy your sweet ride.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next