Suzuki To Volkswagen: Apologize, Or Else

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Suzuki today sent a letter to Volkswagen, demanding a retraction of the allegation that Suzuki breached its contract with Volkswagen. Reuters calls the letter an escalation of “a war of words as it tries to break off equity ties with its estranged partner.” And the tone of the letter definitely sounds belligerent:

For the retraction, Suzuki gives a very tight deadline until September 30. Suzuki does not say what will happen if no such letter arrives. The mention that “Suzuki’s global reputation has been significantly damaged by the announcement made by Volkswagen AG” indicates that Suzuki could be asking for a significant compensation for the damaged reputation. Reputation has a high price in Japan.

In the letter, Suzuki basically says that Volkswagen’s assertion that Suzuki violated their framework agreement by buying engines from Fiat is far-fetched:

“Last year, both companies negotiated for several months regarding the conditions for Suzuki’s use of certain engines manufactured by Volkswagen AG, however, Suzuki’s requirements were never satisfied. In January of this year, when Mr. Osamu Suzuki conferred with Dr. Winterkorn in Hamamatsu, Suzuki delivered its message that Suzuki would not be using Volkswagen diesel engines together with background reasons. In response to such explanation, Dr. Winterkorn requested Suzuki to issue a written notification if Suzuki decided not to use diesel engines manufactured by Volkswagen AG. Within a couple days of such request, we formally notified Volkswagen AG of such decision in writing. Immediately after issuing such notice, engineers from both companies who are responsible for this matter also mutually confirmed with each other that Suzuki will not use diesel engines manufactured by Volkswagen AG.

Volkswagen AG has requested Suzuki in the mentioned notice to implement a process to compare the diesel engines manufactured by Volkswagen AG and by Fiat as a remedial action. We believe it is clearly unreasonable for Volkswagen AG to claim on 11 September that Suzuki is in breach of the Framework Agreement based on presumption that this process is deficient, after a considerable amount of time has passed since Suzuki and Volkswagen AG mutually confirmed that Suzuki would not be using such engine.”

Suzuki’s CEO Osamu Suzuki said today that the partnership had been initiated by Volkswagen, and that the idea was a technology transfer to Suzuki.

“However, we gradually realized that only with the minor shareholding by Volkswagen, 19.89%, Suzuki cannot have the initially promised access to their technology in reality.

Patiently, we continued effort to materialize cooperation, which will be win-win for both companies. However, this partnership does not bring us benefits we expected but turned out to be a “ball and chain” for our managerial independence.

On September 11, Volkswagen AG sent us a notice alleging that Suzuki committed a severe breach of our Agreement and published it through their press release. This again became our new “ball and chain.”

Today, Suzuki officially and publicly became untied. It is highly unlikely that Suzuki will find a written apology in its mailbox by end of the coming week.

Hamamatsu is in a state of war with Wolfsburg. In case anybody missed the obvious, Suzuki ends its statement suchly:

“I think you can share my view why Suzuki would like to dissolve partnership and cross-shareholding relationship with Volkswagen AG.”

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 17 comments
  • Unhittable curveball Unhittable curveball on Sep 23, 2011

    If Suzuki really wants to get rid of VW's 19.99%, they could just go to the equity market and issue a bunch of new shares, therefore diluting VW's percentage.

  • Th009 Th009 on Sep 23, 2011

    In principle, yes. But if you want to get VW down below 10%, for example, you would need to dilute *everyone* by 50% -- and would today's equity market have appetite for such a huge share offering in Suzuki? Not to mention that VW could keep buying those new shares anyway ...

    • See 1 previous
    • Mike978 Mike978 on Sep 24, 2011

      @wsn true but they could also easily get more shares as a % - not exactly what Suzuki want. But then again they have been pretty clueless so far so anything could happen.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next