By on August 3, 2011

 

I didn’t drive the Bugatti Veyron, but here you are reading my review. So how exactly did an automotive journalist with zero manufacturer connections, and no income (at the time) aside from menial paychecks as a drum instructor get the nerve to write a Veyron review?

“SOLD…to the gentleman by the staircase!” bellowed the auctioneer, before everyone applauded the winner of the night’s ultimate charity prize: a trip to Bugatti central for a factory tour and a full day of seat time in the Veyron.  As I stood next my brother, who was still in shock from being that high bidder, I knew he’d once again give TTAC a taste of the high performance combined with the brilliantly decadent.  But, over a year later, the good Dr. Mehta is still busy beating cancer into remission.  And we’re running out of time before the Veyron slips into the history books.

Luckily, he was kind enough to being me along.

 

We embarked on the same Bugatti Experience as a potential customer: meals, drinks, snacks and facility tour complete with a PowerPoint presentation. The overview discussed the original Veyron design mule, pre-VW intervention.  Imagine the current Veyron except with flatter curves, a look more in tune with Bugattis of the past and less like a VW New Beetle on steroids.  Not that the Veyron is plump and derivative. But like a Rubenesque C5 Corvette, there are too many round elements fighting for your attention.

 

Whatever.  The interior doesn’t disappoint: suitably luxurious carpets, leather soft/aromatic enough for its price point and sheets of Alcantara giving the impression of sitting inside in a gigantic piece of tiramisu. The dashboard is a slice of heaven, framed by metal trim that doesn’t attract attention to itself, letting the center stack’s engine turned aluminum receive the praise it deserves. The air registers feel precise enough to come from a defense contractor’s machine shop.  The Burmester Audio system possesses the sound clarity, imaging quality and simplistic ergonomics of exquisite audio engineering: Herr Burmester even claims he was involved in the monocoque’s design from the early stages.

 

The Veyron’s other electronic distractions impress, mostly because of their limited real estate and flat learning curve. If a Rothko takes several minutes to make an indelible impression, the every interior subsystem in the Bugatti is crafted with the same thought.  But thoughts get rather simplistic when three large needles on the Veyron’s gauge cluster violently–yet effortlessly–swing to the right.  And this is where the good Dr. Mehta takes us home.

Sanjay writes:

The first time I buried the throttle after clipping the apex of a tight right hander leading to the back straight, as the quad snailed W16 howled and tried its best to fling me off into the horizon, reality started to sink in….life is pretty damn good.

 

After my tour of the Bugatti grounds, I met my French date: a solid black Veyron with a delicious caramel leather interior, showing 33,000 km on the clock. The staff informed me that this car had been driven, and driven hard.  But aside from a few rock chips and worn leather on the keyfob (that looked suspiciously like my last VW rental), this Veyron was virtually new.

Settling into the comfy, manually adjustable bucket, (custom sizes available, ‘natch) top-tier craftsmanship was evident everywhere. Retired F1 driver Pierre Henri Raphanel drove me off the Bugatti grounds to a twisty country road, while casually discussing the cars attributes. To illustrate, he came to a complete stop on a two-lane road with a gentle S bend about a hundred yards ahead. While continuing his speech, Pierre floored the throttle. The car lunged forward with the slightest wisp of wheelspin (times 4), hit second gear and negotiated the bend ahead with two fingers casually on the wheel at approximately 80 mph. The entire ordeal took less time and effort than it did for you to read this sentence.

My turn: with a fair bit of time in high powered machinery myself, the Veyron is most notable for its civility and near total lack of traction related issues. I tooled around small villages in the Alsace region, where people peered out of local wineries to get a glimpse of the black Bug at every turn. In this environment, the car felt much like any other stiffly sprung, ground clearance challenged exotic. Despite the 2+ tons of weight, the big Bug is more Lamborghini and less CL65 over city streets. Which is to say, it’s civilized enough, but the ride quality was no better than a magnetic ride equipped 3200 lb Vette.

Aiming at the autoroute, the car settles into a 200 km/h groove in 7th gear like a good German ‘bahn burner, with minimal wind noise or tramlining; however the presence of those huge wheels and Michelin PAX runflats, stiff bushings, and tight Eibachs prevents any AMG-ish pretense of true relaxed cruising. When holes opened up (or even when they didn’t), small throttle openings quickly lead to BIG speed even at low revs, thanks to 4 little lag-free turbos pushing 488 cubic inches. A 997 Turbo in high gear doesn’t stand a chance, but a stock (TVS blown) C6 ZR1 at 2000 rpm would probably have no trouble staying in the rearview mirror. Until the Veyron driver discovers sport mode, that is.

 

In sport mode, the tach (and adjacent Power Meter) stay resolutely towards the right, keeping the W16QT on full boil until you manually upshift. I easily saw 250+ km/h in between clumps of traffic with the same ease achieved in either my twin-turbo Ford GT or Gallardo…

…but this thing is bone stock. On pump gas. With a warranty to boot.

Oh, and it has another 150 km/h in reserve, you know, to dispatch said tuner cars if need be, though I didn’t have the heart to tell Pierre that the turbo Lambo (on race gas @25 psi of boost) would eat this thing alive in midrange acceleration. Not that it mattered anyway: piloting the Veyron is an experience.

 

We arrive at the track L’Anneau Du Rhin about 45 min after leaving the Molsheim factory. Pierre remains in the passenger seat, instructing me on a wet/dry slalom aimed at demonstrating the AWD and stability control systems. After a few laps, including standing starts and lane changes on wet pavement (with the stability turned off), it’s abundantly clear that the microprocessors can in fact keep all but the most hamfisted clods from getting into trouble.

 

The real fun began when Pierre coached me through 3 or 4 laps around the short course at progressively higher speeds, realizing I had some seat time on the track before. “Oui, you are good, I cannot earn my paycheck teaching you. Enjoy!” thereby giving me free reign to lap the track, though he reactivated the nannies. Frankly, that’s fine by me: I had no desire to test the limits of my insurance deductible, and the car has remarkably high yaw thresholds before intervening.



Yes, that means I throttle steered a freaking Veyron! It’s able to change direction like a modern era 300 lb NFL lineman, but its forte is still a straight line: even on the short straightaway, 200+ km/h is doable. Over and over, with the W16 sounding remarkably like a big block pushrod V8 from behind me. Unfortunately, a tight 1st gear right hander at the end of the straight eventually gets the best of even these 15.7″ ceramic discs, and the brake/tire over temp light momentarily forces a pit stop. 1001 hp and 4400+ lbs does not a good track car make.

During the pit stop, the low coolant light again rears its head, and our engineer reads the codes, quickly surmising a leak in the intercooler. He has the carbon fiber rear bodywork off in less than 10 minutes, topping off the intercooler tank with–what else–the same Evian we enjoyed in the pits.

Thirty minutes later, I’m back making hot laps. Now able to settle in a bit more, I notice the steering is extremely communicative, with virtually no discernible torque contamination. The dual clutch gearbox blips the bent sixteen seamlessly, though the gears are so closely spaced, the torque bandwidth so massive, that shifting is rarely necessary.

 

I remember thinking that I’ve been lapping this 7 figure car for an hour as hard as my C6 Z06, and the tire bill alone for this day was probably greater than what it cost me to put a cam, headers, and tune on my Z. One full set of rubber costs as much as the twin-turbo conversion on a Ford GT!

 

Finally a few laps with the F1 hot shoe behind the wheel on the long course at Du Rhin, and I am presented with a certificate in a matte aluminum frame commemorating this bucket list worthy experience. Did I mention life is good?

I still had another 45 min stint back to the factory, and I could feel the bond with this Veyron test mule beginning to grow. Momentarily stuck behind a French camion going under 120 km/h, I reflected on the morning’s presentation:

Over breakfast in the Bugatti library, the team gave an overview of the unlikely sequence of events leading to the production of the world’s most outrageous super car of the 21st century, it became clear how unlikely it was that the Veyron would truly see the light of day: over budget and not meeting its targeted performance parameters.  But CEO Ferdinand Piech’s baby somehow overcame all economic and engineering obstacles to become the highest performing production vehicle in existence.

 

His goal was clear: a formal statement of VW’s engineering prowess, able to blast through the atmosphere at 400 km/h and drive to the opera with equal aplomb.

I say Mission Accomplished. And I got to put 220 km on one of them.

 

But can any car, no matter how good, be worth one million dollars? Well, more like $1.5 million at current exchange rates. If I were a bajillionaire, there would be one of these parked next to “my” McLaren F1. For those of us with slightly shallower pockets, check out the high-end tuner cars with comparable or better power and similar AWD grip. The VAG themselves have a Lamborghini Aventador with 700 hp, pushrod actuated coilovers, and AWD for $400k.

Let’s be real though: in the Veyron’s league, price is irrelevant. There can only be one king, and I for one, bow before him. The Veyron, now officially out of production, cemented its place in history as the most fantastically capable road going conveyance ever built.

(The Mehtas offer their sincere thanks to John Hill of Bugatti North America, Mr. David Duthu and everyone at Houston’s Classy Chassis Concours d’ Elegance for making this happen.)


Not a fan of TTAC on Facebook?  For shame, because here are some answers to the questions YOU asked.

David B: if you park it at a “scratch and dent” store you got bigger problems than the paint job on your Veyron.  Mark Galutera: everyone knows it, so its pretty much like the Elvis or Michael Jackson of any motorway. Brendan M: buy the train to carry your Veyron to keep the miles down. Adam L: the new one for every day outside of Pebble Beach concourse de elegance. Eric R: no diapers needed. John T: Tough call, as Sajeev’s broke Caddy would turn just as many heads in less-privileged parts of Houston.

Keven F: aside from the keys and probably the headlight switch/signal stalk, I don’t remember much VAG family resemblance.  Shifter trim maybe, but much like the Ford GT, the badge engineering is good enough to keep you in rapture.  Craig G: Sorry, there’s no diesel or station wagon option, put away your checkbook.



Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

40 Comments on “Review: 2010 Bugatti Veyron 16.4...”


  • avatar
    redliner

    What a marvelous machine. I could never afford one, but I don’t want to live in a world where things like this are not possible.

    If Daimler really consider themselves to be peerless (as evidenced by one of yesterdays posts) in the the world of engineering and luxury, why is Maybach, their highest achievement, considered an automotive joke, while Volkswagen’s upscale brands are generally respected?

    • 0 avatar
      jmo

      Because a Maybach is a ham handed rebody of a 2 generation ago S-Class? I’d guess that VW put 5 or 10 x as much money into the design and development of the Veyron as MB did into Maybach.

      • 0 avatar
        JJ

        Story was that at the intended production run of 300 cars (now increased with a couple of Gran Sports), they would have to sell them at 5 MM a piece to recuperate the R&D and production costs…

        Nevertheless, personally I don’t really like that much. In being this fast and awesome in so many ways it detracts from Aventadors and higher-end Ferraris, yet it’s not awesome enough to justify the price (much less the running costs) IMO. It’s not particularly fast round a track, it’s (from what I’ve read over and over) not particularly engaging to drive (an experience though I’m sure), the noise is not that great because of the turbos, it’s too heavy…Even if price doesn’t matter it still kind of does when you can find too many ‘faults’ with the product. So I’m not surprised there are always quite a number of these on sale at any given time despite the low production number.

    • 0 avatar
      wsn

      – “If Daimler really consider themselves to be peerless (as evidenced by one of yesterdays posts) in the the world of engineering and luxury, why is Maybach, their highest achievement, considered an automotive joke, while Volkswagen’s upscale brands are generally respected?”

      Would you even attempt believe that crap? If MB is peerless, they should make the S-class better than any RR, instead of using the Maybach name.

      • 0 avatar

        That’s a good point about the S-class, but then it’d be too expensive, probably, and then less voluminous, and Daimler would do less well by it. But I think the new S is going upmarket though.

        The maybach should have been a Mercedes…

  • avatar

    But can any car, no matter how good, be worth one million dollars?

    It depends how much money you have. This Packard Twin Six originally cost Al Jolson $6,600, a lot of money when you consider a new Ford cost about $400 then, but it’s still only about $108,000 in 2011 dollars. I’m not even sure that any of the ultra luxury marques have any cars that cheap today. Still, someone paid $1.1 million for it last week.

    It doesn’t go 253 mph, but if you have big bucks and want to make a proper arrival at the opera, Veyrons can’t hold a candle to prewar cars. A dual cowl Lincoln or Packard, or this Hispano Suiza, makes a much classier statement.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBLCawq8tWQ

    • 0 avatar
      jmo

      No, a Veyron is a modern day Model J Supercharged Duesenberg – an exercise in cost no object art, craftsmanship, technology and engineering.

      A Packard Twin Six is equivalent to a modern day Lexus LS600h.

      • 0 avatar

        I wasn’t comparing them directly, just saying that the formal prewar cars make a certain statement. While an SJ Duesenberg might be fine for clubbing, Herr Piech specifically mentioned the opera and I think for that you need a more formal car. BTW, I’ll be posting pics of a Duesenberg SJ boattail speedster on Cars In Depth in the next couple of days.

      • 0 avatar
        jmo

        I’ll be posting pics of a Duesenberg SJ boattail speedster on Cars In Depth in the next couple of days.

        I guess that American manufacturing’s answer to the Model SJ is a G-550 or Citation X. It pains me that none of the ultra premier pre-war American car companies survived into the present day.

        It would be so nice to have at least one American company in the Rolls Royce, Ferrari pantheon.

  • avatar

    BTW, here are some pics that I took of Ken Lingenfelter’s black and blue Veyron at the Eyes On Design show and the media preview for the Concours of America. I agree that the Beetle on steroid look of the front end isn’t that attractive but the rear three quarter view is great. The way the rear end, the C pillar/flying buttress and fender flare work together is great design. It looks cool in 3D too, with the exposed engine, but the car leaves me cold. I’m sure that if I drove it, my opinion would change.

  • avatar
    geozinger

    I’ve only ever seen them. The whole experience sounds fantastic…

  • avatar

    Dr. Mehta FTMFW!

    Thank you for making this review happen here! Great story.

    Fast shipping, No problems, product just as desrcibed. Would do business again! Thanks A+++++++++

    • 0 avatar
      H Man

      hah!

      Agreed on the review. I love the Veyron, so reading this on TTAC is extra cool.

      National Geographic TV did an hour about the Veyron a few years ago, and it is exceptionally interesting. The engineering is mind-blowing. Highly recommended for gear/pistonheads.

  • avatar
    Zackman

    Are you sure this is a real car? It sure looks like one of those VW kit cars to me.

    Overall the design is sleek, but that odd-shaped grille just doesn’t seem like it was meant to look that way. Was this car finished? Other than that, I can’t imagine taking something like this for a drive. I’d be scared to death, at least for awhile.

  • avatar
    wsn

    When I first looked at the second picture, I thought “nice house, with a miniature Veyron on the coffee table.”

  • avatar
    FleetofWheel

    The round VW bug resemblance was intentional since the goal of this car was to showcase VW engineering prowess.

    Like good advertising, it grabs and holds your attention while the whole time your brain records ‘VW VW VW’.

  • avatar
    CC_Stadt

    “giving the impression of sitting inside a gigantic piece of tiramisu”

    This may be the most inviting assessment of a car’s interior in any car review ever written to entice me to check it out in person! Unfortunately, in the case of the Veyron that will never happen.

  • avatar
    DearS

    Nice achievement and now time to do some soul searching. Kids are starving and other cars do more with less.

    • 0 avatar
      Educator(of teachers)Dan

      Awwwwwwwwwwww come on, this is one of the things I love about TTAC. Editorials, piston slaps, hammer time, and reviews of everything from a Veyron to tiny little city cars you can’t even get in the US.

      Actually what I’d love to see next is a review that pits the base Impala (NEW 3.6V6/6 speed), base Charger (NEW 3.6V6), vs. base Taurus. Sort of like the “Yank Tank Comparo” but at a lower price point – Call it the “Zachman Challenge.” :P

    • 0 avatar

      The money isn’t being burned. I once was describing the Ferrari Enzo to my cousin. When I told her it was $600K, she said, “they could be feeding people with that money”. I replied, “They are, they’re called Ferrari employees”. All the people that I know who have $100K+ cars already give a substantial amount of money to charities.

      I know of a guy with an Enzo, a Carrera GT Porsche and an LP 640 Murcielago. That’s in addition to more plebian Porsches and Mercedes Benzes. The amount he’s spent on his cars doesn’t come near the $22 million that I know of that his family’s donated to local non-profits, nor the money they spend underwriting the Special Olympics.

      When you tell rich folks not to buy extravagant things, the people who get hurt most are the folks making and selling those extravagant things, not Richey Rich, Scrooge McDuck and Mr. Burns.

      • 0 avatar
        johnny ro

        Agree, same principle applies to the Sistine Chapel.

        By now nobody remembers the price in cash, and somebody “very close” to God said, “the poor will always be poor”.

      • 0 avatar

        Giving to charity as empirical justification for big personal spending (though not that it needs any) is a very broad blanket statement and not entirely applicable.

    • 0 avatar
      DearS

      I do believe in skilled workers making a living selling awesome cars, and that many people will achieve success being as honest as they know how to be. Still I don’t believe most do nor that money is distributed fairly in most (capitalists) nations. The car is fine, its the system the car came from that has many issues.

      Also I can’t except this car as the top whip in the world. Is it a drivers car?

  • avatar
    Alexdi

    Love the sense of perspective from someone who’s already driven something fast before. I’d be interested to hear a review of that turbo Gallardo.

  • avatar
    Educator(of teachers)Dan

    A little part of me has to laugh at the remark that the W16 sounds remarkably like a V8, either VW has managed to make a very unique engine sound like a good V8 or the power overlap makes a W16 sound like a V8.

    1000 hp, I can’t even wrap my head around it… I remember when I was amazed as a kid that a Corvette made 300+hp.

  • avatar

    Great review. And outstanding marketing job by Bugatti North America. For the cost of airfare to France, lodging, food and access to a Veyron press mule for 120 miles (the tires wear fast, but not that fast), VW gets itself a glowing review in the most skeptical car publication in the world, one with millions of readers. And unlike autojournos on Porsche’s Deutschmark, Sanjay even paid for the privilege. Not to Bugatti/VW of course, to a charity, so much the better for Bugatti’s public image.

    Sure, VW got lucky. They didn’t know that the doctor brother of one of TTAC’s editors would be at that charity auction, a brother who has enough first hand knowledge of fast cars and writing skill to be able to craft a well written account of his experience.

    Sajeev, Sanjay didn’t happen to get comped a couple of ducats to that charity auction by a local VAG dealer, did he?

    I keed, I keed.

    Great review.

  • avatar
    johnny ro

    I am not familiar with the Mehta’s family member backgrounds.

    I must admit I was thinking of Walter Mitty as I read along. For those of you under a certain age, I thought of Buckaroo Banzai.

    The real problem with this car is not the million dollar purchase price. Its the lack of habitat. You can’t drive it like it was intended to be driven unless you own the whole country. Now thats a rarified customer base.

  • avatar

    I went down to Edison NJ ferrari/Maserati to see one. It was like seeing fine art.

    I can’t look at any other car the same way knowing this car exists. this car rules them all.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQZuzTBK1qI

  • avatar
    ajla

    I still think I’d get a bigger thrill out of driving a 455SD, but I suppose this would be a top 5.

  • avatar
    AKM

    You guys should have let me know you were in Alsace! Moved back here a while ago, ad could have shown you around! Well, next time

  • avatar

    Great review! I’m sure it was special.

    Are you sure it’s all out of production now? What about the Grand Sport?

    I look forward to the Galiber.

  • avatar
    beefmalone

    You left out one important point…how much did you pay for this experience?

  • avatar
    sportyaccordy

    Call me a mindless purist, but the Veyron embodies everything I hate. This experience tour thingy is prob a better way to enjoy it, as I imagine its inherent lack of engagement would get old fast. To me there is nothing worse than a “performance” car that isn’t designed to be DRIVEN.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • J & J Sutherland, Canada
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India