Japanese Proverb: No Money, No Action. No Action, No Satisfaction

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

The chief reason for the recent decline of the fortunes of Japanese automakers was not, as posited by pop pundits, the recalls or the tsunami. It was something more insidious, something regularly overlooked by most outsiders and many insiders. It was a reduction in development spending – an eventually deadly bottom line therapy also popular by cash-starved American peers. Japanese automakers have realized the error of their ways and have returned to funding the finding of that insanely great next generation car.

In the wake of the “Lehman syokku” or “Lehman shock” as they usually refer to the 2008 financial crisis in Japan, Japanese automakers drastically reduced R&D spending in an attempt to shore-up their bottom line. This is a tried & true tactic in the industry: if a disaster hits, cut R&D and advertising. The cashflow-positive effect of both is as immediate as snorting cocaine. The negative effect will not be felt until years later. In many cases, the problem is shifted to the next generation of managers who now have to sell tired technology to unenthused customers. The best medicine for car sales is new cars. Old cars are slow acting, but sure poison. A car takes 3 to 5 years to develop, medicine and poison become felt after long delays.

The epicenter of the “Lehman syokku” was America, and three years after, the American market is still wobbly. Car companies most exposed to the syokku – American and Japanese – put spending into crisis mode. European companies were far less affected and mostly maintained their spending level. This explains why Volkswagen, Daimler, BMW et al are riding high, and why the friskiest Japanese car company is Nissan with its ties to European Renault. Three years after the syokku, we are beginning to feel the effect in earnest, and it will stay with us for a while until it is digested.

Japanese companies are reaching for the antidote: Increased R&D spending.

“Seven automakers plan to spend 2.09 trillion yen, up 10 percent from fiscal 2010,” reports The Nikkei [sub]. Converted to today’s dollars, that’s $38 billion, a good chunk of money. Japanese markers are “racing to develop the next-generation of environmentally friendly vehicles as well as low-priced models for emerging nations.”

Nissan for instance is seen increasing its R&D spend by 15 percent to 460 billion yen ($5.8 billion). Honda plans to spend more than 500 billion yen ($ 6.5 billion),” aggressively developing budget cars for emerging countries.”

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 33 comments
  • Robert Schwartz Robert Schwartz on Aug 28, 2011

    I don't think lack of funds accounts for the ugly, fat, uninspiring cars that Toyota and Honda are selling.

    • Eldard Eldard on Aug 29, 2011

      It costs a ton of money to make cars both exciting and reliable. I've said it before and I'll say it again, you have to choose one or the other. Not both.

  • DearS DearS on Aug 29, 2011

    Toyota and Honda have inspired me to take many a reliable trip. Its not all about the excitement in the drive, It's also about getting to where I'm going with my car in one piece. I parked my 89 Corrola last year next to brand new luxury SUVs at a mountain youth camp in the Dominican. I don't think I had any less an exciting time than anyone else. Drove up and down to beaches, rivers, resorts etc etc..the car had 230k plus. I can't picture many cars to do that with, maybe in the future things will be different.

  • Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
  • Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
  • 28-Cars-Later " Electrek&nbsp;recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue.&nbsp;"Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
  • AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
  • MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.
Next