By on July 13, 2011

In 1998, South Carolina lawmakers mandated that police use dashboard mounted cameras to document the arrest of anyone arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). The state supreme court on Monday ruled that the town of Mount Pleasant was not in compliance with this statute, which states a suspect “must have his conduct at the incident site and the breath test site video recorded.”


DUI arrests have been a major moneymaker for the town of 67,000. Between 1998 and 2008, Mount Pleasant made 2796 DUI arrests, ranking first among municipalities in the state. It should have had the top priority in receiving cameras from the state Department of Public Safety, but it only asked for and received seven. By comparison, the town of Moncks Corner had nearly twice as many cameras for just 198 arrests. Instead of buying cameras to meet legal requirements, town officials spent $65,145 for a “Town of Mount Pleasant” sign placed at a freeway exit. They also paid $100,000 to a marketing firm to come up with a town slogan and $6 million to buy a parcel of property known as the “O.K. Tire Store.”

Mount Pleasant officials believed they could get away with this because the dashcam law was written to take effect gradually as the video equipment was distributed throughout the state. In 2007, the high court referred to this provision as providing “a reasonable grace period.” In the present case, the justices saw the town as attempting to evade its legal responsibility with an overly clever reading of the letter of the law.

“We find the town’s protracted failure to equip its patrol vehicles with video cameras, despite its ‘priority’ ranking, defeats the intent of the legislature and violates the statutorily-created obligation to videotape DUI arrests,” Justice Donald W. Beatty wrote for the court. “Accordingly, we do not believe that the Town should be able to continually evade its duty by relying on subsection (G) of section 56-5-2953.”

The court found that although the city did not necessarily have to spend its own funds for the cameras, it was responsible for requesting them from the state Department of Public Safety.

“We find the town’s explanation is disingenuous,” Beatty wrote. “Admittedly, the legislature was silent with respect to a time requirement for when vehicles must be equipped with video cameras. However, applying the rules of statutory construction, we find the town’s interpretation would defeat the legislative intent of section 56-5-2953 and the overall DUI reform enacted in 1998.”

The ruling affirmed a lower court’s dismissal of DUI charges against Treva Roberts for a November 1, 2007 incident.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

6 Comments on “South Carolina Supreme Court Busts Town for Ignoring Camera Law...”


  • avatar
    mazder3

    $100,000 to come up with a town slogan?!? Isn’t that something they could ask the townsfolk or the schoolchildren to come up with for free?

    • 0 avatar
      jpolicke

      Time to dig for connections thru blood, marriage, or good ol’boy network between city gov’t and the marketing firm.

      The shame here is that what may have been a legitimate DWI driver walking away because of a technicality. No excuse.

      • 0 avatar
        aspade

        Nearly every DWI driver legitimate or not already walks away. In Mount Pleasant and everywhere else. With four (and sometimes five) figure paydays along the way for the lawyer, the municipality, the insurance company, the interlock company.

        The shame is treating road safety as a source of revenue. As soon as a cash register gets involved abuses like this are guaranteed.

    • 0 avatar
      ClutchCarGo

      Here’s one on the house:

      Mount Pleasant – anything but!

  • avatar
    mikedt

    Every cop car should have video and every cop should have a voice recorder on their person recording every second they are on duty. If the device fails or somehow “accidently” gets turned off the case is dismissed. Recording devices are now small enough and cheap enough that every official interaction should be recorded. It protects both sides.

  • avatar
    Junebug

    Well said Mike, I agree 100%. Short story – as a NC resident, I always cringe going down south as some of those little towns are nothing but speed traps and worse. Thankfully the redneck riviera aka Myrtle Beach is too dependant on tourism to risk getting a bad rep for heavy handed po-lice. Although, if you ride a motorcycle, all bets are off!


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States