Rent, Lease, Sell or Keep: 1986 Toyota Cressida

Steven Lang
by Steven Lang

I was happy as can be this past Monday. A 1999 Firebird with T-Tops was bought for the princely sum of $2750 at a recent sale. Then there was something I hadn’t experienced in a long while. A $300 car. A ‘good’ $300 car. The type that may have nothing more than a banged in door or a mechanical issue easily corrected by visiting an enthusiast site. The car in question was a 1986 Toyota Cressida. Older than dirt as far as cars go.

But then again could I…

Rent: Yes I can. The silver paint on top may be more faded than 25 year old blue jeans. But everything else was fine with it. That is if you’re legally blind. The leather interior had cheap seat covers and the rear driver’s side taillight was held with tape. But what the hell do you expect for $300?

I had bought a 1987 Acura Legend last year for $350 that managed to survive 10 weeks of rentals and nearly 10 months of financing up to now. The weekly payment and rental rate may be uber-cheap due to it’s age. But so far I’ve yielded $2500 from it. This Cressida, another over engineered Japanese marvel, may have serious potential here.

Finance: This is always the tough part. Someone who only has $300 may just trash and neglect this old codger. But at $500 down? They want something nicer. The trick is to first rent it out for a very reasonable rate. Say, $15 a day or $105 a week, and have half the payment goes towards the down payment on the vehicle. In due time you should be able to figure out if the car and the potential owner will last.

From that point forward you can either offer the car as a 50/50 ($50 a week for 50 weeks) or $40 a week for 15 months. What you are selling at this point is transportation. Cold air. Power everything, a sunroof, premium sound… yes the car in question is older than dirt. But you are providing a fair amount of features and convenience for a price that comes close to mass transit in metro suburbia.

Sell: This one has been kept in metro-Atlanta since day one. No rust. Everything works (really!). When I opened the hood I found this…

And let me repeat this… everything works on the vehicle. It’s a time capsule. As such it belongs in one place. Ebay. A rust free classic car usually finds it’s sweet spot online. Even if it’s not much of an enthusiast’’s vehicle. All it takes is two aficionados to send the selling price to the moon.


What I would do is give it a scuff and shoot paint job for $200 and then perhaps find someone with a wrecked spare like this guy.

Offer the spare for a fixed price on Ebay to the high bidder, and sell the Cressida at no reserve with the nicer interior parts already installed. This will give the new owner easy access to cheap parts and enables them to keep a nice looking classic for the long haul. My experience is that when you do this the final bid amount increases by about 15% to 25%.

Keep: Old cars are an addiction. A blinding and financially parasitic addiction that will force you to spend big money on outdated technology. On a car or truck with ‘presence’,. you get the return. A Cressida though is not a collectible. It’s a consumable. The type of car you use until all that’s left is an immovable shell destined for China.

If I hauled the Cressida around Atlanta as my daily driver I would spend well over $2000 extra in gas a year. The Cressida averages about 20 mpg. The Insight… 55 mpg. It’s not even a contest. Plus everyone loves that little hybrid. I don’t see the Cressida stepping up to the daily driver spotlight anytime soon.


So what should I do? Rent it and potentially make it into a finance deal? Sell it on Ebay? Maybe I could make it into the ultimate luxury sleeper by buying up that wrecked car’s interior and use it whenever the mood is there.

Screw that idea. I’m not in the keeper business unless the numbers line up. So what says you?

NOTE: I do have to give special kudos to Jeff Nelson for writing a brilliant article about the 1986 Toyota Cressida only a couple of days ago. How two people in the same state end up writing about the same car for two different editors with the name Niedermeyer is beyond me. Who knows?: Maybe I will just have to sell this car to Jeff.




Steven Lang
Steven Lang

More by Steven Lang

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • Steven Lang Steven Lang on Jul 20, 2011

    I ended up selling it for $1200 this morning. Two guys test drove it the day before for quite a while. They seemed to know quite a bit about the model.

  • 84Cressida 84Cressida on Jul 21, 2011

    It really seems like a few here are under estimating the value of these things or older Japanese cars in general. Older J cars are quickly becoming collector items and increasing in value as the enthusiast base grows. Don't think for a minute that this Cressida if it were in better shape wouldn't be worth a good chunk of $$ for a 25 year old car. Just because you don't like it or don't see the value in it doesn't mean others see it the same way. I don't see the big deal over many of the old Big 3 cars that I consider trash, but some do so...

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next