Tata Troubled By Lack Of Progress In Fiat Alliance

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Before Fiat snapped up Chrysler from the US taxpayers for a song, it saw the Indian firm Tata as another logical partner for a long-term alliance. After Tata bought Jaguar/Land Rover, the auto media was awash in rumors that the British brand would share components with Fiat’s Alfa-Romeo brand. When Tata came out with the Nano, there was speculation that Fiat’s dealers in Europe and Latin America could be used to sell the low-cost car, even rumors of a Fiat-branded version were floated. Fiat even tried to sell Tata on one of its notoriously nasty Italian plants. What did surface from Fiat and Tata’s flirtations: a joint venture in India that, by all accounts, is going not well at all. And now, with Fiat distracted by its Chrysler rebuilding project, Ratan Tata is expressing his displeasure with his firm’s Fiat tie-up, telling The Hindu Businessline

I have to admit that so far, the venture with Fiat has not been as active as we had thought… I think that Fiat has to launch more models into the market to keep dealers interested. It also has to look at its cost structure in terms of parts and components. So the joint venture needs to be looked at quite critically and until that happens, it’s not going to be optimised… As far as what else we can do with Fiat, I think Sergio Marchionne and I can really talk to each other. However, at the working level, it hasn’t quite been that way. We have looked at Latin America to do something together, but things haven’t moved as they should have done

To which we say: good luck getting Fiat to sell your low-cost cars in Latin America. The Italian firm was supposed to sell multiple Chryslers in 90% of its Latin American dealers in order to acquire five percent of Chrysler’s equity, but it managed to get Treasury to reduce that requirement to “at least one” Chrysler vehicle (specifically, the Fiat “ Freemont” rebadge of the Dodge Journey) and only 90% of its Brazilian dealers. You’d think Fiat would want to sell vehicles abroad made by a firm it now owns, but apparently it is jealously guarding its Latin American markets from even Chrysler. If Tata thinks he’ll be able to get a better deal out of the notriously tough-negotiating Sergio Marchionne, he’s kidding himself. Meanwhile, with Fiat expanding in Russia and China, India seems unlikely to get many resources from the stretched-thin Italian firm… time for Marchionne to either work his trademark charm, or get ready to add an “I” to the ongoing rethink of the “R” and “C” of his BRIC strategy.

[HT:@dseetharaman, who updates via Twitter “Sergio Marchionne, donning his Fiat hat, says he hopes to meet the head of Tata before summer-end to discuss Fiat-Tata JV.”]


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • Tstag Tstag on Jun 15, 2011

    Why is TATA bothering? It has the engineering capability at JLR to design and engineer volume cars already. It even has a badge for Europe (the dormant Rover brand). At home it has a captive market. Get recruiting TATA and dump Fiat now.

  • Fred Fred on Jun 15, 2011

    For Tata to publically critisize a business dealing seems serious. I wouldn't under-estimate Tata's ability to get something done...eventually. Like Tstag says, they just need to get on with it.

  • JMII I did them on my C7 because somehow GM managed to build LED markers that fail after only 6 years. These are brighter then OEM despite the smoke tint look.I got them here: https://www.corvettepartsandaccessories.com/products/c7-corvette-oracle-concept-sidemarker-set?variant=1401801736202
  • 28-Cars-Later Why RHO? Were Gamma and Epsilon already taken?
  • 28-Cars-Later "The VF 8 has struggled to break ground in the increasingly crowded EV market, as spotty reviews have highlighted deficiencies with its tech, ride quality, and driver assistance features. That said, the price isn’t terrible by current EV standards, starting at $47,200 with leases at $429 monthly." In a not so surprising turn of events, VinFast US has already gone bankrupt.
  • 28-Cars-Later "Farley expressed his belief that Ford would figure things out in the next few years."Ford death watch starts now.
  • JMII My wife's next car will be an EV. As long as it costs under $42k that is totally within our budget. The average cost of a new ICE car is... (checks interwebs) = $47k. So EVs are already in the "affordable" range for today's new car buyers.We already have two other ICE vehicles one of which has a 6.2l V8 with a manual. This way we can have our cake and eat it too. If your a one vehicle household I can see why an EV, no matter the cost, may not work in that situation. But if you have two vehicles one can easily be an EV.My brother has an EV (Tesla Model Y) along with two ICE Porsche's (one is a dedicated track car) and his high school age daughters share an EV (Bolt). I fully assume his daughters will never drive an ICE vehicle. Just like they have never watched anything but HiDef TV, never used a land-line, nor been without an iPad. To them the concept of an ICE power vehicle is complete ridiculous - you mean you have to STOP driving to put some gas in and then PAY for it!!! Why? the car should already charged and the cost is covered by just paying the monthly electric bill.So the way I see it the EV problem will solve itself, once all the boomers die off. Myself as part of Gen X / MTV Generation will have drive a mix of EV and ICE.
Next