Sell In To The Indians: India To Become World's Third Largest Auto Market By 2020

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

A lot has been said about the new car potential of populous India. This time, they mean it, says J.D. Power. India surpassed France, the United Kingdom and Italy to become the sixth-largest automotive market in the world in 2010. In 2020, India is expected to become the world’s third largest auto market. This according to a special report titled “India Automotive 2020: The Next Giant from Asia,” released by J.D. Power and Associates.

More than 2.7 million light vehicles (passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles) were sold in India in 2010, up from just 700,000 light vehicles sold in 2000. J.D. Power expects India to reach 11 million light-vehicle sales by 2020. This would be what Americans bought last year. It would also make India the third-largest light-vehicle market in the world, behind the United States, which J.D. Power projects to return to its former glory of 17.4 million sales in 2020. By that time, J.D. Power expects the Chinese market to reach 35 million light-vehicle sales, double the projected number of the U.S.A.

What is standing in the way of even higher motorization of India? It’s India’s “three deficits:” Continual international trade deficits; chronic government budget deficits; and an underdeveloped power generation and distribution infrastructure. According to J.D. Power, “the country’s lagging infrastructure poses the biggest potential obstacle to future growth.”

Readers who pay attention may think J.D. Power’s numbers are a bit off. India’s 2010 numbers had been reported as 1.87 million, J.D. Power says it was 2.7 million. The official Chinese number for 2010 was 18.06 million, J.D. Power says it was 17.2 million. Where is the confusion? The 1.87 million reported by the Wall Street Journal for India omitted commercial vehicles. The Chinese number includes commercial vehicles. J.D.Power attempts to replicate the American “light vehicle” count, which often is not officially tracked in other countries. Cars classified as “commercial vehicles” (trucks, vans, etc. can have a large impact on the count, especially in emerging markets, but also in the U.S.A. Please refer to my treatise on car counting. And watch out for some wire services, notably the Associated Press, that blatantly report wrong numbers when it comes to pass.

TTAC’s position is that in absence of hard light-vehicle data, the total of all automobiles should be taken. It is much closer to the light vehicle count than passenger vehicles. And most of all, it is the number which the world’s car counting authority OICA uses.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
 7 comments
  • Eldard Eldard on Jun 13, 2011

    Of all the BRIC countries, India is the one I will mostly stay away from. China is the only one that will become really successful as proven by Chinese enclaves Macau, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and Chinese everywhere. They are successful wherever they go. They are the single wealthiest ethnic group in the whole of Southeast Asia. At least Russia and Brazil have vast oil reserves to save their lives.

    • See 4 previous
    • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Jun 13, 2011

      That "gross imbalance" is partially truth, and partially fiction. In the truth department, many Asian cultures have always favored male offsprings. Selective abortions are just as in favor in India as they are in China. In China, they are against the law. Rich people can skirt the law by going to Hong Kong, poor people won't even get a visa to Hong Kong. The one child policy never applied to farmers anyway. In the fiction department, here the latest stats from the Chinese census: "Of the population enumerated in the 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities and servicemen of the mainland of China, 686852572 persons or 51.27 percent were males, while 652872280 persons or 48.73 percent were females. The sex ratio (female=100) declined from 106.74 to 105.20." There actually are MORE women than 10 years ago (last census.) Nature tends to produce always a few men more, the current world wide sex ratio at birth is estimated at 107 boys to 100 girls. The value for the entire world population is said to be 101 males to 100 females. Nobody seems to complain about selective abortions in India. For China, images of sex starved men that roam the streets are being whipped up.

  • Snabster Snabster on Jun 13, 2011

    I have a hard time imagining this. Indian cities are just clogged right now. The only argument for having a car is the commute across town is 2 hours is in air conditioning rather than a a scooter or bus. Yes, you can blow up some slums and build expressways, but they still can't handle a volume of traffic that this would entail. Where is India going to import the gasoline or diesel? And even if you go hybrid or electric the power system can't handle it. Hell, just moving cars on trucks on Indian roads is a nightmare. I see a bright future for Indian trucks. But the more trucks on those roads the harder it is for cars. It is already bad, and wait until those new roads falls apart because of truck traffic in five years.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next