Saab Sells Factory, But Sweden and EIB May Be Killing It Off Anyway

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Saab has reached a deal to sell 50.1% of its real estate holdings to a consortium led by Hemfosa Fastigheter AB, for about $40m, and has also received an order for $18.4m worth of vehicles from an unnamed Chinese firm according to AN [sub], giving the dead-alive Swedish firm the faintest, cruelest glimmer of hope. The real estate deal was for about a third less than the property had previously been valued at, and still needs to be approved by the Swedish Debt Office, the EIB and GM. Meanwhile, the real struggle is ongoing, as a Saab spokesperson tells Reuters that

Today’s news takes us a good way in the right direction, but it is the agreement (with suppliers) that matters and only then will we be able to communicate a date when we can restart production

But suppliers aren’t even the first in line for Saab’s much-needed cash injection: that goes to workers who are promising to take the company into bankruptcy if they aren’t paid soon. These two recent deals should be enough to pay worker salaries through July, but if suppliers aren’t brought back as well to restart production, the bulk sale and an earlier order from PangDa will never be filled. And those suppliers are currently mulling over an offer of ten percent of what they are owed until the Chinese inject more cash later in the year… not the greatest deal ever. Meanwhile, Saab says

There are other initiatives still being pursued. There is not much we can say about that until we have something concrete to communicate

Like what? What could there possibly be to communicate?

SVD.se reports that GM is increasingly sympathetic to Vladimir Antonov’s case, and that approval of his stake in the firm could come “within days.” But the problem, it seems isn’t GM but the EIB. A rumor reported in SVD.se goes something like this: the EIB “found something” in its research on Antonov, and with Swedish elections coming down the line, the government wants to let the EIB take the fall for “killing” Saab by not giving approval to Antonov. This is very much a rumor, but given how important confidence is in any kind of cash crisis, not to mention the fact that an eventual Antonov investment has been a key confidence builder for struggling Saab, this is shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand. In any case, there’s got to be a reason for the EIB’s continued non-approval of Antonov’s investment, and even if there isn’t, every day that goes by without approval, these rumors will only grow and further undermine confidence in Saab as a going concern. Ironically, the EIB cites Saab’s lack of viability for refusing to pay out further installments of its loan as well, further aggravating the vicious cycle that we call “circling the drain.”

And the problem, ultimately, all comes back to production. Some of Saab’s suppliers, including dashboard contractor IAC, are refusing to go along with Saab’s plans to restart the line next week, saying they are not cooperating with the factory at all. And though dagensarena.se is trying to put political pressure on the Swedish government to force the EIB’s hand and get a deal together, there seems to be relatively little leverage for that argument. After all, Saabs employees aren’t working now, and observers seem to believe that many current employees could keep working even in bankruptcy. How? Give up the building cars thing and become a dedicated engineering and consulting outfit. After all, that strategy has kept even smaller firms (like Lotus) afloat before now…


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 14 comments
  • Sam P Sam P on Jun 29, 2011

    When Saab eventually ceases to be a going concern, I wonder how much of a depreciation hit late-model Saabs will take.Saab produced a 280 horsepower AWD 9-3 with a 6-speed manual gearbox in 2007-8 and brought a number of them to the US market. http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2008/11/review-saab-9-3-turbo-x/ I bet parts will be pretty much unobtanium after the company's demise, though, and reliability will probably make my Bimmer look like a Corolla.

    • Bryce Bryce on Jun 29, 2011

      Parts are easy its just a Vauxhall VXR with a Saab badge but the dealers think theyre worth real money though customers are few and far between

  • Meccano Meccano on Jun 30, 2011

    And you would loose that bet. SAAB's part division is a separate entity; a subsidiary legally protected from the sins of the parent. SAAB goes under, SAAB Automobile's parts division lives on. They have their own contracts with suppliers, their own inventory, their own lines of credit, their own warehouses and their own distribution chain. Perhaps most importantly they are profitable. There are millions of SAABs out on the road (despite your presumed unreliability), so they have plenty of business for many years to come even if the last SAAB has already rolled off the assembly line. There is nothing mystical about repairing a SAAB either and any competent mechanic can work on them. Most independent mechanics that specialize in Volvos also gladly work on SAABs as well.

  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X '19 Nissan Frontier @78000 miles has been oil changes ( eng/ diffs/ tranny/ transfer). Still on original brakes and second set of tires.
  • ChristianWimmer I have a 2018 Mercedes A250 with almost 80,000 km on the clock and a vintage ‘89 Mercedes 500SL R129 with almost 300,000 km.The A250 has had zero issues but the yearly servicing costs are typically expensive from this brand - as expected. Basic yearly service costs around 400 Euros whereas a more comprehensive servicing with new brake pads, spark plugs plus TÜV etc. is in the 1000+ Euro region.The 500SL servicing costs were expensive when it was serviced at a Benz dealer, but they won’t touch this classic anymore. I have it serviced by a mechanic from another Benz dealership who also owns an R129 300SL-24 and he’ll do basic maintenance on it for a mere 150 Euros. I only drive the 500SL about 2000 km a year so running costs are low although the fuel costs are insane here. The 500SL has had two previous owners with full service history. It’s been a reliable car according to the records. The roof folding mechanism needs so adjusting and oiling from time to time but that’s normal.
  • Theflyersfan I wonder how many people recalled these after watching EuroCrash. There's someone one street over that has a similar yellow one of these, and you can tell he loves that car. It was just a tough sell - too expensive, way too heavy, zero passenger space, limited cargo bed, but for a chunk of the population, looked awesome. This was always meant to be a one and done car. Hopefully some are still running 20 years from now so we have a "remember when?" moment with them.
  • Lorenzo A friend bought one of these new. Six months later he traded it in for a Chrysler PT Cruiser. He already had a 1998 Corvette, so I thought he just wanted more passenger space. It turned out someone broke into the SSR and stole $1500 of tools, without even breaking the lock. He figured nobody breaks into a PT Cruiser, but he had a custom trunk lock installed.
  • Jeff Not bad just oil changes and tire rotations. Most of the recalls on my Maverick have been fixed with programming. Did have to buy 1 new tire for my Maverick got a nail in the sidewall.
Next