By on June 22, 2011

Nearly two months ago, American senators complained that China is continuing its “long history of breaking international trade rules” and that there is a “trade barrier that is designed to prevent U.S. automakers from accessing the Chinese market” for electric vehicles.

As Ed Niedermeyer said it back when, there were no new rules. There still aren’t any. If there is one man who should be up to date on rules on electric vehicles around the world and especially in China, then it’s Carlos Ghosn. After all, he did bet the future of two companies, Renault and Nissan on the future of the EV. Also, Nissan is the largest Japanese brand in China, and Nissan’s joint venture partner is Dongfeng, a company owned by China’s central government. So he should know what the rules are.

The trouble is: Carlos Ghosn has no idea. This is what he said today:

“China still did not officialize their policy on electric cars. The official policy has not been made official yet. Obviously we will launch an electric car in China. But before launching it we want to know: What are the rules?”

“Will China give incentives to the consumer? It seems like the answer is going to be yes. Who will be benefiting from the incentives? Do you have to be a Chinese brand in order to benefit? Under what conditions will you be able to produce batteries in China? Does the 50:50 rule apply to batteries? Does it apply to the new technology we will be bringing?”

“There are a lot of questions that still are not officially answered. We have some hints. But the stakes are so big that you cannot afford massive investments without knowing exactly what the rules are.”

“This will hopefully happen around summer this year. We have the intention to go with the electric car and the new technology to China, because the Chinese believe in the electric car, they need zero emission, and every single sign they are giving is that they are going to support it heavily.”

There is something that Ghosn knows, and it’s that the  Chinese market is still growing:

“During the month of May, the sales of passenger cars continued to grow in China. And I can tell you even in the month of June we see the sales of passenger vehicles continue to grow. Commercial vehicles are going down for a very simple reason: There were a lot of incentives on the table. When you stop the incentives, obviously you will drive the market down.”

TTAC readers have known this for a while.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

4 Comments on “Ghosn To China: Give Us Your Rules, And We’ll Give You Our EV...”

  • avatar

    Ghosn is correct to have concerns of unknown rules. See the following information from a Chinese State paper:

    Extract from “China Daily” p14 – Business international – issue Thursday June 2nd 2011

    “The national guidelines on auto parts JV for new energy vehicles released in April have sparked heated discussions over the pros and cons of the proposed policy.
    The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) released a draft Catalogue for Guiding Foreign Investment in Industry, which has been thrown open for comments. The draft indicates that foreign investors will be limited to a maximum of 50% stake in JV producing key components for new-energy vehicles.

    China has a 50-50 rule for auto manufacturing joint ventures, but the proposals are the first time such an investment cap has been imposed on auto-part companies.

    Many foreign auto-parts manufacturers that have set up wholly owned companies in China or hold a majority share in domestic JV, have expressed concern over the regulation.

    According to the draft, the phrase “key components” cover everything, from batteries to control systems, which means a host of components makers involved in new-energy vehicle technologies will be affected….

  • avatar

    Another thing… China still have not set the charging plug interface standard for EV’s.

  • avatar

    China does currently tax all imported vehicles @ 25%.

    But, if you want to see WTO violations, just google WTO rules against China.

  • avatar

    If China still maintains it 50/50 rule, we should do the same – It would be amusing to see the Chicoms forced to build lead-based-toy factories here in America and have hire some our city winos to staff it.

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    carguy - It not a question of if but when Toyota will phase out the V6 in the Camry. There are a host of packaging and cost incentives that Toyota won’t pass up (and nor...
  • Re: EPA Mandates Real-World Testing For All Automakers

    Lorenzo - Landcrusher, please include “/sarc” at the end of your comments. People who stop by only occasionally or recently, and...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    Sigivald - ” If the rest of the market is eliminating that option, shouldn’t Toyota follow? ” Maybe. Or maybe not. After all, if you can steal customers from the...
  • Re: Cadillac ATS-V Coupe Spotted At The Ring

    SomeGuy - Enjoy it while you can: s.html – E39 Perhaps the E60 fixed all of those issues. I know, I know “preventative...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    tankinbeans - I’ve driven and owned more I4s than V6s and honestly I’ve never really felt like I was missing anything with an I4. I had a 4.0 Aerostar as a first car...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    Sigivald - Do they have different rear brakes than the I4? Weird, if so – the rears get so little comparative load that I’m surprised they’d bother to upgrade...
  • Re: Toyota May Kill V6 Camry

    heavy handle - The I6 went away for packaging reasons: unless you’re BMW and don’t care, they take too much space away from the cabin. Also, there hasn’t been a...
  • Re: Cadillac ATS-V Coupe Spotted At The Ring

    davefromcalgary - True, Sir.y It is just that in the last 14 years they have featured Cadillac all of 3 times: the CTS when Art and Science was born, the CTS-V in...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1986 Buick Somerset

    Lightspeed - The brand managing geniuses at GM managed to put the Regal and Cutlass names on about a dozen cars across 4-platforms. our customers literally had no clue...
  • Re: Fourth-Gen Toyota Prius To Receive AWD, New Battery Packs

    KixStart - Electrifying the back wheels might also allow for improvements in regenerative braking.

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India