Feds Could Pull Tesla Roadster's Advanced Airbag Waiver

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Automotive News [sub] points us to a notice in the Federal Register, which notes that

In accordance with the procedures in 49 CFR Part 555, Tesla Motors, Inc., has petitioned the agency for renewal of a temporary exemption from certain advanced air bag requirements of FMVSS No. 208. The basis for the application is that the petitioner avers that compliance would cause it substantial economic hardship and that it has tried in good faith to comply with the standard…

Not so bad, right? As a small manufacturer, Tesla simply has to prove that it still isn’t in the financial shape to put advanced airbags in its money-losing Roadster… after all, nothing has fundamentally changed since the initial waiver was granted. But it turns out that NHTSA isn’t going to give out these waivers like candy anymore…

Notwithstanding those previous grants of exemption, NHTSA is considering two key issues–

(1) whether it is in the public interest to continue to grant such


petitions, particularly in the same manner as in the past, given the


number of years these requirements have now been in effect and the


benefits of advanced air bags, and

(2) to the extent such petitions are granted, what plans and


countermeasures to protect child and infant occupants, short of


compliance with the advanced air bags, should be expected.

While the exemption authority was created to address the problems of small manufacturers and the agency wishes to be appropriately attentive to those problems, it was not anticipated by the agency that use of this authority would result in small manufacturers being given much more than relatively short term exemptions from recently implemented safety standards, especially those addressing particularly significant safety problems.

Given the passage of time since the advanced air bag requirements were established and implemented, and in light of the benefits of advanced air bags, NHTSA is considering whether it is in the public interest to continue to grant exemptions from these requirements, particularly under the same terms as in the past. The costs of compliance with the advanced air bag requirements of FMVSS No. 208 are costs that all entrants to the U.S. automobile marketplace should expect to bear. Furthermore, NHTSA understands that, in contrast to the initial years after the advanced air bag requirements went into effect, low volume manufacturers now have access to advanced air bag technology. Accordingly, NHTSA tentatively concludes that the expense of advanced air bag technology is not now sufficient, in and of itself, to justify the grant of a petition for a hardship exemption from the advanced air bag requirements

And guess what? NHTSA should be pulling Tesla’s waiver. After all, if a couple of guys importing Shuanghuan Noble gliders in small batches and converting them to CNG power are complying with NHTSA’s Advanced Airbag requirement, why shouldn’t a well-funded, public company that has received hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer support?

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 9 comments
  • Eldard Eldard on Jun 10, 2011

    Why not hire Tiger Woods? He's the best person to sell golf carts.

  • Don1967 Don1967 on Jun 10, 2011

    I can't believe that the political impetus to fast-track goofy golf carts is already crumbling. I thought for sure that the global warming hysteria would be forever, just like dot-com stocks and disco music.

    • See 1 previous
    • GS650G GS650G on Jun 11, 2011

      Super Prez wants a million electric cars on the road in three years, we have to start somewhere.

  • IBx1 Everyone in the working class (if you’re not in the obscenely wealthy capital class and you perform work for money you’re working class) should unionize.
  • Jrhurren Legend
  • Ltcmgm78 Imagine the feeling of fulfillment he must have when he looks upon all the improvements to the Corvette over time!
  • ToolGuy "The car is the eye in my head and I have never spared money on it, no less, it is not new and is over 30 years old."• Translation please?(Theories: written by AI; written by an engineer lol)
  • Ltcmgm78 It depends on whether or not the union is a help or a hindrance to the manufacturer and workers. A union isn't needed if the manufacturer takes care of its workers.
Next