Better Place Opens First European Battery Swap Station, Expands To Australia

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Though it doesn’t get the play it deserves in the auto media, Project Better Place is one of the most ambitious, potentially disruptive plays anywhere in the world of cars, uniquely positioning itself to eliminate the biggest shortcomings of electric vehicles. TTAC was on hand when the “end-to-end” EV services firm opened its first battery swap station in Israel, and now the firm has launched its first European swap station in Denmark. Better Place’s single model, the Renault Fluence Z.E won’t be widely available in either of the two initial launch markets until later this year, but having sold over 70,000 of its initial order of 100k units from Renault, Better Place is keeping its foot on the gas… er, juice.


Earlier this year, BP signed a deal with GM’s Australian division Holden and several suppliers, to develop large, rear-drive sedans based on the (Zeta Platform) Commodore. At the time, we noted

This project is highly significant on a number of levels. First, battery-swap-enabled large sedans operating in Australia could show the way forward for the US, by breaking stereotypes about EV size, capability and operating environments. Second, the project marks the first sign of flirtation between General Motors and Project Better Place’s battery-swap-based business.

And that initial challenge, proving that BP’s battery-swap infrastructure can provide “unlimited range” EV motoring at relatively low costs (thanks to its unique battery-leasing arrangement) outside of tiny, densely-populated markets like Israel and Denmark, is one that the firm is eager to conquer. And so BP is building on pilot testing in Canberra, Australia, by announcing that the first Fluence Z.Es will begin arriving Australia in the middle of next year. Cars will first arrive in Canberra, and Australia-wide sales will follow, and according to the firm’s press release

By 2013 Better Place will give Australia the largest electric car charge network in the world, which is expected to outpace current deployment plans in market-leading countries including the US and China.

If Better Place can build momentum and create a viable market for its EV scheme in Australia, there’s no reason it can’t do so in the US. Keep an eye on these guys…

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 15 comments
  • Edward Niedermeyer Edward Niedermeyer on Jun 29, 2011

    Thanks for the link! The full story you reference can best be found here: Fleet Boost For Electro-Commodore. 100 miles is about typical for what can be done affordably using current battery technology. Nissan's Leaf gets 100 miles of range (give or take) and it's a much smaller car. Better Place isn't trying to improve the EV's intrinsic performance... that task ultimately falls to battery developers. What BP does do is offer "unlimited" range within their charging network. Battery improvements are doubtless coming, but the challenge that remains is the long charging time, which can leave you stranded for hours at a time. BP's network eliminates that wait, swapping your used-up battery for a fresh one in about the time it takes to fill up with gas. This is why I'm so bullish on BP: it doesn't require a major improvement in battery chemistry to make EVs viable, and it eliminates a major problem (charge time) that is likely to persist even with new chemistries. It also insulates owners from battery degradation, another huge EV downside, by selling cars and only leasing batteries as part of a "mileage plan" like a cell phone's "minute plan." The downside is the upfront cost, which is significant and usually requires some kind of government assistance (also, there's currently only one car available). In general I'm not a fan of businesses that require government support, but A) most governments subsidize EVs anyway, and BP's infrastructure makes EVs viable and B) as an infrastructure play, I see BP's concept as something of a "natural monopoly" like a telephone company or utility. And for the amount of money the US spends on ethanol subsidies each year ($6b+), BP could make much of our interstate system useable by electric cars (they say Seattle-San Diego would cost about $1b)... imagine driving coast-to-coast with an EV! How's that for range?

    • See 4 previous
    • Charly Charly on Jun 30, 2011

      @cackalacka If electric cars are a success than a shared garage will have a recharger for your car

  • Zykotec Zykotec on Jun 29, 2011

    It's a great idea, sure beats hauling a diesel generator on a trailer :) I still think the biggest advantage of EV's would be for cleaner city traffic, and in places where electricity is clean in itself.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next