Treasury Won't Sell GM Until Stock Improves. GM To The Rescue?
Bloomberg reports that a “person familiar with the matter” says the US Treasury won’t sell its remaining stake in GM as long as the automaker trades below its $33/share IPO price. Previously the government’s auto team had said it would not try to “time the market” and our analysis showed that the Treasury was likely to sell sometime late this Summer. But it’s been months since GM spent more than a few days above its IPO price, indicating that Treasury may be waiting considerably longer if the IPO-price floor is set in stone. And with $36.5b in cash equivalents on hand and only $5b in debt, GM’s $45b market cap is hardly encouraging… especially with investors waiting for The General to match Ford’s profitability levels. Heavier discounts mean a lower operating profit for GM in the US market, and the first quarter shows a $1b swing in pricing between the two firms (with Ford improving $700m and GM dropping $300m) according to Bloomberg. Lower finance earnings are also holding The General back relative to Ford. So, what’s GM’s response?
CEO Dan Akerson used a strange inversion of the old “what’s good for General Motors is good for America” formulation to explain his firms struggles to shareholders, telling the Detroit Free Press
More than any other company that I’ve been a part of … we are tied to the economy. I worry about a jobless recovery, because people who have jobs buy cars.
And despite GM’s giant cash pile, or rather, because of it, Akerson seems more worried about the credit market than anything else. The WSJ [sub] reports that much of GM’s cash could go towards building up in-house finance operations, as well as funding pensions, restructuring Opel, dropping $5b on its Korean GM-Daewoo operations, investing in product and upgrading facilities. And because of his emphasis on the finance side, the Freep reports
GM is still working to restructure, Akerson said. But he worries about GM’s prospects if Congress doesn’t raise the debt ceiling this year, causing the U.S. to default on loans. “I think it would shake the credit markets tremendously,” Akerson said. “I think we shouldn’t underemphasize that and play chicken with our national credit rating, our national honor.”
Akerson isn’t the only CEO to worry about credit markets, but wasn’t one point of the bailout to help make GM less sensitive to credit market shocks? In any case, Akerson’s warning to the feds wasn’t just idle chatter, as even he seems to believe that the government could be forced to either take a loss on its equity stake in the short term or hold on for the long term.
Before the meeting, Akerson told reporters he wasn’t happy with GM’s stock performance, but he felt stockholders should view GM as a longer-term investment. “You invest for the two-, the five-, the 10-year periods,” he said.
Yet the White House isn’t going to want to still own GM equity by the time the 2012 election campaign hits high gear… but then it won’t want to incur larger losses than the $14b-$16n it’s been forecasting. Which leaves the bailout boosters in something of a damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don’t position. Which, in turn, puts the pressure back on GM to buy out the government stake on its own terms. And sure enough, a number of reports suggest that GM (or its “executives”) could buy back the government’s stake… but the government doesn’t want it to look like The General is benefitting from from its politically-motivated impatience, and that option seems to be off the table now. Instead, GM could buy up outstanding public shares, artificially inflating the price and allowing the Government to exit with (relatively) minimal losses. In short, a variation on a pump-and-dump (and, because the money ultimately comes from taxpayers, yet another shell game). The stuff of inspirational campaign fodder it ain’t, but it may just be the only option left on the table.
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- SCE to AUX It's fun when liberal interests fight each other.
- Varezhka Suzuki Jimny, Toyota Century, and I know it technically just ended production but Honda e.
- CoastieLenn For those that care to read the details of the crash NOT included in this article but published elsewhere- this happened at nearly 10pm when the CRV was stopped in the center lane of travel, lights off, with the driver remaining in the car. Not only is it not known if Blue Cruise was being used, it would have been a nightmare for most alert human drivers to mitigate that driving the 70+mph speed limit on many sections of I-10 in Texas, much less an AV system.
- Jeff This is what I would want: Toyota has now released an affordable truck called the Toyota IMV 0. The newly developed vehicle made in Thailand comes with a rear-wheel drive and a gasoline 2.0-liter inline-four matched to a 5-speed manual transmission. NEW $10,000 Toyota Pickup Has Ford & GM Crapping ... YouTube · Tech Machine 8 minutes, 46 seconds Dec 26, 2023
- Jalop1991 At the same time, let's take these drivers off the road--at least the ones that haven't yet taken themselves off the road.I can guarantee, at no point was this guy or any of the dead Tesla-stans actually driving the car. They were staring at their phones, because, HEY, SELF DRIVING!!
Comments
Join the conversation
Reference is made in the article to GM's "giant" 36.5G USD cash pile. Some of that money can't be used for anything but keeping the gears of the GM financial machine greased and in motion... from back in the crisis, and adjusted for the smaller size of the company, I would say that the current figure needed in this circulation might be around 20G USD... If the foregoing is true, then the 16.5G USD remaining doesn't seem like a lot... a few rough quarters and that reserve would disappear like a popcorn fart. This leads me to wonder if this is the real issue behind the GM CEO's comments, namely if the liquidity in the capital markets begins to evaporate, he will have trouble to re-finance his revolving debt or add additional debt... Hi-Fi is not my area of expertise, so befor the bashing begins, I voluntarily pre-emptively plead to a possible mea culpa... however, to me it seems that all the cash-consuming things on Mr. Atkerson's to-do list won't (all) get done because he simply doesn't have the cash to do them... and given this, if my above statements hold true, a stock buy-back to juice the share-price seems like a terribly risky idea. Maybe they will find somebody to take Opel off their hands...
GM's $36.5 Billion in Cash is higher even than last years most profitable automaker, VW, reportedly with only $29B in cash. GM now has miniscule debt and no liquidity issues. If I were a betting man, I'd bet this is an unfounded rumor, with the European Tech center the lead for Epsilon architecture. On the other hand surprising things have been happening and the $Billions lost on Opel are all that keep GM behind Ford in earnings. btw-Akerson recently put $1,000,000 into GM stock personally.