Inside The European C02 Race

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

In the grand old days of the European auto industry, rival houses would battle for supremacy in endurance, road, rally and formula racing, the results of which were treated as far more important than (or, at least the basis for) such prosaic concerns as sales volume or profitability. In the modern era, this fierce competition slacked, as racing became about brand-building and competition moved into the arenas of sales and profits. Now, however, a new competition has erupted between every brand with a presence in the European market, only this time participation is compulsory and the stakes are survival in a super-competitive, mature market. And neither speed nor endurance will win this race against time: only reaching an EU-mandated carbon emissions goal by 2015 will do.

The chart at the top of this post, from a JATO Dynamics study [ PDF here], shows the race by manufacturer group. The overall fleet average target for 2015 is 130g/km, a march that Toyota has already achieved. However, each manufacturer also has a separate target for 2015, calculated in proportion to the average curb weight of its cars. As a result, each automaker is still shy of their 2015 target, but Toyota is still the closest, needing just a 4.2% improvement to achieve its target. Daimler, meanwhile, has four years to improve its average emissions by nearly 20 percent (despite being one of the only manufacturers with a target significantly above 130g/km).

For another look at the race to clean up emissions, here is a chart of average C02 output by brand. If nothing else, it shows the impact of luxury and sportscar brands on manufacturing groups, as (for example) the Fiat brand has an average emission of 123.1 g/km, but Fiat Group (which includes small volumes of high-carbon-average Maserati and Ferrari sales) emits 125.9 g/100km. And the Fiat Group case is very nearly best-case, as Autocar reports that Ferrari topped the sportscar brand carbon emission reductions from 2009-2010, shedding an average of 46 g/km to 326 g/km, thanks to a 46% volume mix of relatively low-emissions Ferrari Californias. Ferrari also has small-car specialist Fiat to average out its emissions, a luxury that (among major European sportscar brands) only Aston Martin can not rely on.

Aston shaved only 2 g/km off of its average emissions, from 359 g/km to 357 g/km, between 2009 and 2010. More importantly, because it is an independent firm with no mass-volume brand to help its average, Aston has to take radical action to make its target. You might know that “radical action” as the Aston Martin Cygnet, possibly the most reviled car in auto enthusiasm-dom. It ain’t pretty, but dammit, it emits only 99 g/km. Whereas previous eras of European automaker competition created cars like the 250 GTO and Jaguar D-Type, the Great European Carbon Race has yielded a rebadged Toyota. Ain’t the modern world grand?


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Multicam Multicam on Apr 14, 2011

    I'm certain that when I'm 80 years old and comfortably retired, some of us will be looking back at this global warming carbon emission hysteria shaking our heads. Most of us, however, will be ruining everyone else's fun by panicking about the next crisis.

  • Wolfwagen Pennsylvania - Two long straights, 1 medium straight, 1 super short straight and a bunch of curves all on one end
  • Haze3 EV median weight is in the range of 4500-5500lbs, similar to the low end of full size pickup trucks and SUV's or typical mid-size PU's and SUV's. Obviously, EV Hummers and PU's are heavier but, on average, EV=PU or mid/full SUV is about right. EV's currently account for ~1% of the cars on the road. PU's account for 17% and SUV's count for over 40%. If we take out light SUV's, then call it 30% SUV or so. So, large-ish PU's and SUV's, together, account for ~50% of the US fleet vs 1% for EV's. As such, the fleet is ALREADY heavy. The problem is that EV's will be making the currently lighter 50% heavier, not that PU/SUV haven't already done most of the damage on avg mass.Sure, the issue is real but EV responsibility is not. If you want to get after heavies, that means getting after PU/SUV's (the current problem by 40-50x) first and foremost.
  • Redapple2 Telluride over Acadian (sic-tip cap-canada). 1 better car. 2 60 % us/can content vs 39 THIRTY NINE for an "American" car. 3 no UAW labor. Smart people drive Tellurides. Not so smart for the GMC. Dont support the Evil GM Vampire.!
  • Theflyersfan My dad had a 1998 C280 that was rock solid reliable until around 80,000 miles and then it wasn't. Corey might develop a slight right eyelid twitch right about now, but it started with a sunroof that leaked. And the water likely damaged some electric components because soon after the leaks developed, the sunroof stopped working. And then the electrical gremlins took hold. Displays that flickered at times, lights that sometimes decided illumination was for wimps so stayed home, and then the single wiper issue. That thing decided to eat motors. He loved that car but knew when to fold the hand. So he bought a lightly used, off lease E-class. Had that for less than two years before he was ready to leave it in South Philly, keys in the ignition, doors unlocked, and a "Take it please" sign on the windshield. He won't touch another Benz now.
  • Detlump A lot of people buy SUVs because they're easier to get in and out of. After decades of longer, lower, wider it was refreshing to have easier ingress/egress offered by an SUV.Ironically, the ease of getting in and out of my Highlander is very similar to my 56 Cadillac.
Next