South Dakota House Votes to Ban Photo Enforcement

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

The South Dakota House of Representatives voted 43 to 24 on Tuesday to prohibit the use of red light cameras and speed cameras in the state. A bipartisan group of lawmakers led by state Representative Peggy Gibson (D-Huron) took aim at the controversial automated ticketing machine set up in Sioux Falls, describing the due process denied innocent motorists ticketed by the system.

“My constituent not only did not own the car that was photographed, but she was not even in Sioux Falls at the time,” Gibson said Tuesday. “In other words, she was presumed guilty of a traffic violation she did not commit in a car she did not own, but she had to go to great lengths to prove her innocence.”

Sioux Falls hired the Australian contractor Redflex Traffic Systems to set up the cameras without legislative authorization. A lower court judge has already ruled the system violates state law ( view decision). To address the issue, the House-passed legislation provides a straight-up ban on “photo radar speed detection” and use of a “photo monitoring device to detect any red light violation” by any “state, county, municipal or township authority.” At the request of the state attorney general, an amendment was added to clarify that dashcams may still be used by law enforcement. That did not satisfy a handful of members who defended automated ticketing.

“This situation right here is a matter that should be addressed to the Sioux Falls city council,” state Representative Stace Nelson (R-Fulton) said, using material provided by the local police chief. “This is a local issue, they have jurisdiction on this…. I want to remind you that the reason the light was there to begin with is the loss of a human life. Now I’m not going to ask you to quantify how much the life of one of your loved ones is worth.”

State Representative Gene G. Abdallah (R-Sioux Falls) took issue with that characterization, pointing out that the camera was set up at the intersection specifically because it was one of a handful in the state where right turns on red are prohibited. Many motorists get tickets at the location not knowing they have done anything wrong.

“That is nothing but a traffic trap,” Abdallah said. “Unfortunately, someone was killed on that corner. Is there a camera on every corner where someone is killed?”

If the bill is passed by the full state Senate and signed by the governor, South Dakota would become the sixteenth state to ban automated ticketing machines. Five other states are considering joining the list by enacting photo enforcement prohibitions. The bill’s other primary co-sponsors included Jamie M. Boomgarden (R-Chancellor), Elaine Elliott (D-Aberdeen), Jenna Haggar (I-Sioux Falls), Mark Kirkeby (R-Rapid City), Betty Olson (R-Prairie City), Lance S. Russell (R-Hot Springs) and Charles M. Turbiville (R-Deadwood).

House Bill 1161 as passed (South Dakota Legislature, 2/8/2011)

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 5 comments
  • DXPower DXPower on Feb 11, 2011

    In the 2000's, many speed cameras were installed in France. People started to trick the system for example by transforming a "6" into an "8" with black tape, putting mud on the plate number or steeling plate numbers in airports. Some people even attacked the speed camera with a hammer, an other guy was placing explosives until he lost his hands after a wrong manipulation. No matter the stupidity and stubbornness of people, speed cameras helped to tremendously reduce the number of death on the road. Speed is now more enforced; it's annoying because you constantly have to check your speedmeter, but it apparently saves lives.

    • George B George B on Feb 12, 2011

      DXPower, most automated camera enforcement in the US is clearly to generate local government revenue, not to improve safety. The most common violation is not stopping behind an arbitrary white line before making a right turn at a red light. The second most common violation is to be making a left turn and getting caught by an unexpectedly short yellow. Since the private companies earn more money when more people break the law, intersections are modified to make it more likely that motorists are caught on camera making a minor infraction. Whenever there is a trade-off between revenue and safety, length of yellow timing for example, local governments seem to always pick the more revenue option. Analysis by former Duncanville, TX city councilman Paul Ford. http://www.paulfordreports.com/4701.html

  • DXPower DXPower on Feb 12, 2011

    In the case of an intersection as described in the link, this is indeed a very likely possibility. But what about a speed camera on the highway ? What about a speed camera in a school zone ? I also would like to see a system to detect car that refuses priority to pedestrian when they cross and it's green for the pedestrians. I,m fed up risking my life everyday. There isn't enough cops, and we don't want more cops, but people are not always respectful either.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next