By on February 15, 2011

Bloomberg [via AN [sub]] reports that Chrysler’s fleet sales mix was at 25% in the month of January (according to Edmunds anyway, as Chrysler doesn’t release fleet numbers), the lowest level since a Cash For Clunkers-fueled August 2009. According to the same Edmunds data, however, the industry average fleet mix is just under 20%… and Chrysler’s 2010 average was 38%. But now that Chrysler’s been under 30% fleet for three months, sales boss Fred Diaz figures meeting the industry average is just a matter of time. Specifically:

By the end of the year, we will definitely be at industry average. That’s the goal; that’s our plan.

Considering Chrysler’s fleet sales fell from 56% to the 25%-range over the course of the last year, it sounds like the last few steps of this journey will be the most difficult. Especially when you remember that Chrysler’s also trying to increase volume some 45% this year. That means some 300,000-450,000 more Americans will have to decide to buy Chrysler Group products this year than did last year if the Pentastar wants to achieve both its volume and fleet goals. That’s going to take some serious selling…

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

16 Comments on “Quote Of The Day: I Can Stop Any Time Edition...”


  • avatar
    northshorerealtr

    With Chrysler mostly selling designs that were, <cough> a little past their design-and-execution prime, it’s not surprising that their sales were down.  But, with the revised/refreshed/updated products coming online now, a surge in sales wouldn’t surprise me.    The Big Jeep has gotten good reviews, the Town and Country received a remarkable review here….and I’m hoping the same will happen with TTAC’s drive of the 300C.  (And, yeah, that review IS coming soon, right?)

  • avatar
    Educator(of teachers)Dan

    Start making interiors with actual colors in them (you know like blue cloth, red leather, you guys remember color interiors right?) and I’ll roll the dice and take a gamble on you Chrysler. 

    • 0 avatar
      FromaBuick6

      Buick and I think Chevrolet offered both red cloth and leather into the early ’00s.  And it’s made a comeback on a variety of newer vehicles, including the 2011 Dodge Charger.
       
      As for blue, lets leave that one dead and buried.  Unless we’re talking about naugahyde in a mid-’60s metallic light blue convertible.

    • 0 avatar
      iNeon

      +1 for Dan– sorry Buick :(
       
       
      My first car was a basic-as-they-came 1G Taurus L, but that car had lovely blue corduroy(dual benches) seats and fake(the kind without even a shiny finish) wood– with velour door trims and carpet so thick it was like teased magic troll hair. I loved that car’s interior, and I’d have another. Also had a lovely white Mercedes-Benz with nautical blue naugahyde– it was beautiful.
       
       
      Modern folk wear blue jeans every day– there’s nothing wrong with some medium/dark blue! Now, I had a friend with a 2G taurus GL, and that one had a jade green color scheme inside-and-out– they can keep that one. Except– I always loved it on the last XR-7s, with the white leatherette trims. It was pretty loud, but so rich. There’s just no color saturation in modern interiors. The greys are lifeless, the tans aren’t buttery enough.
       
       
      WE WANT SOME ACTUAL COLOR!!!

    • 0 avatar
      Jedchev

      I would love to buy a 300C in white with a lipstick-red leather interior. Or pale yellow with matching leather. Car interiors are very disappointing in color.
      One of my favorite interiors was the Dark Jade/Light Jade Luxury Group interior of the Lincoln Mark IV and Mark V. Match it with the thickest shag carpeting on the market, and it makes for more luxury than you’ll get today.
      http://automotivemileposts.com/files/mark41976darklightjadeleather.jpg
       
       
       

    • 0 avatar
      Roundel

      Here ya go Dan…
      http://blstb.msn.com/i/C3/7B574F57CFA16DECF65C7C833AB9A3.jpg
      Saw a black RT with this interior last weekend.
      Its perfect.

    • 0 avatar
      Educator(of teachers)Dan

      So I wonder what it would cost to retrofit a gently used previous generation 300 with actual colored leather?  I have to ask cause I love the Ralph G designed 300 but hate the depressing gray leather and total lack of even fake wood in most trim levels.

  • avatar

    Assuming Dan and I are thinking along the same lines, the blues and reds in question would be more of the sixties style (bright) than akin to what you would’ve found in a ’97 Lumina rental car. The burgundies and navy-ish plush interiors of the nineties were, IMO, truly terrible. Bright red and or blue leather (or vinyl?) on a Charger would be an entirely different story.
    Also, is Chrysler maybe the company to bring back restrained tailfins? (Sight-lines, if you Mercedes’ parlance.) They’re pushing the most traditionally American vehicles on the market today (the LX cars at least), and I don’t think it’d be an entirely bad move.

    • 0 avatar
      Educator(of teachers)Dan

      Saw a Mustang GT (2008) with red leather sets in a black interior a few days ago, epic.  My first car (1982 Celebrity) had a milk chocolate brown interior, nice.  My 2nd car (1987 Oldsmobile) had a blue veluor interior, loved it.  Parked next to a colleauges early 1980s Ford pickup today, Lariat package, red cloth interior, that was sweet.  Give me some FREAKING choices, Detroit!  Heck I saw a late 60s Caddy online the other day with a GREEN interior. 

  • avatar
    gslippy

    Aren’t fleet buyers “Americans”?

    I still don’t get the obsession with fleet sales.  Sure, they may be low-margin sales, but they are sales, and these vehicles don’t end up in a black hole somewhere – they eventually go to ‘real’ consumers who choose to buy them.

  • avatar
    doctor olds

    Fleet sales have the same up front margin as any other for the carmakers, at least up front. There are no volume discounts for anyone from the makers, and every sale has to go through a dealer, who typically takes a small margin to win large fleet business. I knew of a Chicago Olds dealer who sold cars to Avis for $17 over cost. He made more money on the pre-delivery inspection labor allowance! It more than covered all his costs to process the deal and gave him sale volume bragging rights. He just saw it as plus business.

    The problem comes in on the other end of the transaction when the carmakers guarantee the resale value to the biggies like Avis and Hertz. The cars are sent to auction when they come out of service. The carmaker makes up any shortfall betwen the actual auction price and the guaranteed price. If residual values are low, the whole transaction could be loser. That is how it was done in the past, though I can’t vouch for the details today, for sure.

    • 0 avatar
      Motorhead10

      When you write “same up front margin as any other for the carmaker” – do you mean if the same vehicle was sold retail? I ask because it seems to me that a fleet vehicle would be a less optioned vehicle (typically). And it would also seem to me that the critical driver of operating margin of the specific vehicle would be level of content. So, a sale to dealer of a “fleet” vehicle versus the sale of a higher optioned vehicle would not have the same margin, correct? The operating profit contribution would obviously be higher from the unit priced higher – if the margin % was the same. But I would expect a couple hundred basis point difference between a retail vs fleet vehicle just on the level of additional optional content. No?

  • avatar
    jpcavanaugh

    These fleet sale percentages are from a Chrysler lineup that was the least appealing since perhaps the 61 Studebakers.  This is old news.  Also, the Charger is becoming the police car of choice in the US. 
    Come back to us in a year on this.  If Chrysler’s new stuff is getting dumped into rental fleets or as strippo GSA cars, then we have an issue.  Personally, I am betting that Chrysler’s new stuff will see some substantially increased retail sales.

    • 0 avatar
      Roundel

      Lets be honest.
      There will always be a standard level of fleet sales. I work for a rental car company, and judging by the brisk business, their will always be the need for cars.
      This continued obsession with fleet numbers ignroes the fact mentioned above, sales are sales.
      With Chrysler introducing better products and then putting them into rental fleets, consumers are then given a test of the product, and if its good, it could possibly lead to a future sale. We have Grand Cherokee’s in the fleet and they don’t stay on the lot for more than 5 mins. People adore them and ask for them specifically when renting an SUV. I’ve had more than one person tell me that they are going to purchase one based on their fantastic experience with the rental.
      I think this is the right plan for Chrysler…. let the product speak for itself.

  • avatar
    vent-L-8

    I really wish that Chrysler had the designs to back up their recent commercials.  I want to like Chrysler, I really do.  Growing up our neighbor always drove new (70s-80s) Chryslers.  A steady string of Imperials, New Yorkers, 5th Avenues and LeBarons.  I remember (lots) of chrome and interiors that were plush to almost absurd extremes.  Kudos to whoever is making this year’s Chrysler TV adds.  They are striking and emotional, everything that I wish Chrysler’s new cars would be.

  • avatar
    Zackman

    Make my car with a “saddle brown” interior color, please. Chevy always had the best one, as far as color was concerned. The 1976 Chevy truck I once owned had that. My Impala has a grey-ish, two- or three-tone interior with a hint of khaki(?) to it. Not bad for the times. I have the “sport appearance” package, which has the faint, paisley-like pattern to the seats. At least it’s different. I like it. It goes well with the Cappucino Frost exterior.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States