Penske, Nissan Rebadge Out As Mercedes Gets Smart (Back)

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: February 14th, 2011

penske nissan rebadge out as mercedes gets smart back

Automotive News [sub] reports that Mercedes-Benz has agreed to take over Smart car distribution in the United States from Group after about three years of operating as a Penske-run distribution channel. Beginning in July, Mercedes will take over all of Smart’s US-based operations because

1. It needs the small-car volume to meet new corporate average fuel economy standards that take effect in the United States in the 2016 model year.

2. Daimler AG integrated Smart into the Mercedes-Benz car unit September. The United States is the only market where Smart and Mercedes operate separately.

But the impact of this deal isn’t limited to ownership and operations, as AN [sub] reports that the four-door car being developed by Nissan for Smart USA has been canceled.

Says Mercedes-Benz USA CEO Ernst Lieb

If Smart continued as a free-standing network, they would need a second model to make it viable. By integrating it into Mercedes-Benz, there is no need.

Talk about a re-boot. Even the brand’s US boss, former Saturn honcho Jill Lajdziak is out, and Mercedes will appoint a new General Manager for the brand. More Mercedes dealers could be brought into the new Smart network, which will be run “similarly” to Mercedes’ Sprinter van brand. And with the cancellation of the Nissan rebadge, a move that reeked of desperation, it seems that Mercedes is back to handling Smart as a long-term investment that could bear fruit if gas prices spike. Though some will make the argument that the US needs the Smart brand like it needs more exposure to Bristol Palin, a new generation of lower-cost Smarts (jointly developed with Renault) could do better stateside when gas goes up again. And having lost money on Smart for decades, Daimler would have been crazy to let its brand equity be wiped out by become a Nissan rebadging outfit.

#Branding #DealerNews

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 7 comments

Blowfish on Feb 14, 2011

it didnt sound like Roger Penske is making mulla hand over fists. Or else Merc has to pay him dearly inorder to get the rights back. The benzene engines wasnt all it cracked up to be being frugal on fuel. The oel burner was, but not sure why it couldnt be sold in the land of Flower flags or Gold Mountain aka Gim san ( thats what people in Middle Kingdom refer to as)

Like Reply
- Bumpy ii on Feb 14, 2011
  
  The diesel wouldn't pass US emissions without all the particulate traps, catalysts, and urea tanks that other USDM diesels need. It wasn't worth the trouble to design all that for maybe 2,000 sales a year, and more importantly, there's nowhere in the smart to put all that dumb shit.
  
  Like
Obruni on Feb 16, 2011

i found the distribution strategy for urban markets to be a bit odd. In Manhattan, small sales-only showrooms exist for BMW, Audi, and Mercedes. The same could be done with Smart, allowing for a presence in neighborhoods with lots of sidewalk traffic. How much retail space do you need for this car?

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. Any recommendations would be welcomed.
Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
Theflyersfan Matthew...read my mind. Those old Probe digital gauges were the best 80s digital gauges out there! (Maybe the first C4 Corvettes would match it...and then the strange Subaru XT ones - OK, the 80s had some interesting digital clusters!) I understand the "why simulate real gauges instead of installing real ones?" argument and it makes sense. On the other hand, with the total onslaught of driver's aid and information now, these screens make sense as all of that info isn't crammed into a small digital cluster between the speedo and tach. If only automakers found a way to get over the fallen over Monolith stuck on the dash design motif. Ultra low effort there guys. And I would have loved to have seen a retro-Mustang, especially Fox body, have an engine that could rev out to 8,000 rpms! You'd likely be picking out metal fragments from pretty much everywhere all weekend long.
Analoggrotto What the hell kind of news is this?