Mitsubishi Rescues American Production… For Exports?

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Most foreign-based automakers see the United States as a market first and a production center second: If sales are good enough, production will follow. Mitsubishi, on the other hand, seems to be taking the opposite approach. The Japanese automaker has announced [via Automotive News [sub]] that it will replace production its weak-selling midsized offerings (Galant, Endeavor, Eclipse) at its Normal, Il factory with one model: the Outlander Sport compact crossover. The Outlander Sport (known elsewhere as RVR and ASX) is Mitsu’s newest vehicle, but the firm still envisions only abput half of Normal’s planned 50k units of production to be sold in North American markets (a safe estimate considering it’s still not outselling the Lancer). The other half will be exported to Russia, Latin America and the Middle East. That’s right, Mitsubishi is keeping its only UAW-represented workforce in order to build compact crossovers for export.

Though Mitsubishi’s bosses insist that they have no intention of leaving the US, the fact that it’s not replacing its “Project America”-platform midsized vehicles speaks volumes about the firm’s evolving approach to the US market. Rather than half-assing an America-specific lineup without the resources needed to break into our crazy-competitive C- and D-Segments, Mitsubishi seems to be going to a more global lineup. Which makes sense: as gas prices rise, Mitsu’s cheap-and-cheerful global vehicles likely won’t do much worse than the PS-Platform midsized laggards… and they don’t require unique development. According to AN [sub], the plan is as follows:

The first new arrival will be the low-volume i electric vehicle due this year. A Thailand-made global small car is scheduled to arrive in early 2013, and from 2012-15 Mitsubishi plans to bring five more models or variations: an additional electric vehicle and four plug-in hybrids.

The “i” EV will be a tiny volume player, but the forthcoming global small car could at least put Mitsu into competition for the newly-hot B-Segment. As for the rest of the vehicles, who knows? Nissan’s Carlos Ghosn has been giving Mitsu hungry looks, so alt-drivetrain cooperation could be a possibility down the road. There’s even a rumor [sub] that Mitsu will rebadge the Infiniti M as a “replacement” for its Diamante “flagship,” but who knows if that will happen (let alone whether it will be more than a JDM-only deal). Either way, Mitsu is still making a profit globally, so treating the US as a piece of the global puzzle rather than a major growth opportunity makes quite a bit of sense. And if they want to build cars here for export, well, all the better.


Pay taxes in Illinois? Mitsubishi’s 1,300 UAW-represented job there will be saved thanks to $29m of state tax credits over the next ten years.
Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Norma Norma on Feb 04, 2011

    May be next up is Outlander or, even, Lancer 'Made in the U.S.A.' Haha.

  • Trend-Shifter Trend-Shifter on Feb 05, 2011

    If Mexico continues to be more unstable, the US may even see more manufacturing production come back. I read a recent Bloomberg Business Week magazine that said the US government is touting Afghanistan as a future business/manufacturing destination. Sheesh, our own government selling out the US worker after all they have been through. Hopefully a weak dollar, a productive skilled work force, and rule of law can triumph to bring in additional foreign investment instead of chasing the lowest wage. Now let's tell that to our own government!

  • Oberkanone Tesla license their skateboard platforms to other manufacturers. Great. Better yet, Tesla manufacture and sell the platforms and auto manufacturers manufacture the body and interiors. Fantastic.
  • ToolGuy As of right now, Tesla is convinced that their old approach to FSD doesn't work, and that their new approach to FSD will work. I ain't saying I agree or disagree, just telling you where they are.
  • Jalop1991 Is this the beginning of the culmination of a very long game by Tesla?Build stuff, prove that it works. Sell the razors, sure, but pay close attention to the blades (charging network) that make the razors useful. Design features no one else is bothering with, and market the hell out of them.In other words, create demand for what you have.Then back out of manufacturing completely, because that's hard and expensive. License your stuff to legacy carmakers that (a) are able to build cars well, and (b) are too lazy to create the things and customer demand you did.Sit back and cash the checks.
  • FreedMike People give this company a lot of crap, but the slow rollout might actually be a smart move in the long run - they can iron out the kinks in the product while it's still not a widely known brand. Complaints on a low volume product are bad, but the same complaints hit differently if there are hundreds of thousands of them on the road. And good on them for building a plant here - that's how it should be done, and not just for the tax incentives. It'll be interesting to see how these guys do.
  • Buickman more likely Dunfast.
Next