By on January 31, 2011

How did Chrysler do last year? It all depends on how you slice the numbers, isn’t it? As warned, Chrysler’s Q4 was a bit of a letdown, as net revenues dropped from $11.018b in Q3 to $10.763b, resulting in a $199m Q4 net loss. Interest expenses continue to be a major drag on Chrysler’s performance, costing $329m in Q3 and a whopping $1.228b over the course of the year. Cash dropped by nearly a billion dollars from Q3 to Q4, ending the year at $7.347b (not counting $2.3b in undrawn government facilities). Chrysler nearly hit the 1.6m worldwide sales number touted in its Five Year restructuring plan, as well as the 1.1m US-market target (although fleet mixes appear to have been higher than anticipated). Chrysler also hit its goal of $40b+ in net revenues and exceeded Operating Profit and EBITDA projections, but as the slide from Chrysler’s Q4 financial presentation [PDF here] shows, Both debt (which will likely be restructured this year to reduce costs) and depreciation/amortization have killed Chrysler this year… which is why EBITDA and Modified Operating Profit take the top billing in Chrysler’s financial reporting.

Pricing has seen modest improvement this year, rising from $28,100 to $28,300, and average incentives dropped by $100. Inventory levels increased last year, from 58 days of supply last January to 63 days in January. And though volume dropped in the fourth quarter, pricing and mix generated by new 2011 products did help stem some of the bleeding, adding $39m to the Q4 modified operating profit walk. Meanwhile, industrial and selling (SG&A) costs have increased due to production changeovers and marketing needed to bring the new products to market.

And though Chrysler essentially hit its targets for this year, next year is, as Sergio Marchionne puts it, “the year of execution.” And Chrysler’s Guidance for 2011 is necessarily ambitious: Increasing global volume from 1.516m units to over 2m units is hard enough. Using its projected 2011 SAAR of 13.4m units, Chrysler’s market share will have to jump from 9.2 percent to around 12 percent in order to make its 1.6m US volume goal this year. Harder still: taking Modified Operating Profit from $736m to over $2b on 500k incremental units globally. CEO Sergio Marchionne  insists that new and updated products will bring gains in both pricing and volume, but he will need to deliver on both to keep his Chrysler turnaround rolling through 2011. Government debt will need to be refinanced, and some form of net profit will have to be shown this year anyway, if Sergio wants his “Christmas present” of an IPO this year, so we will either see a independent, profitable Chrysler this time next year.. or not.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


6 Comments on “Chrysler Posts $652m Net Loss For 2010...”

  • avatar

    The interest payments hurt ($1.3 billion in interest) but they are on federal loans, so that’s money paid back to taxpayers. With the new and refreshed models coming out and the improved sales climate they should be back in black. Whether they meet their target is another thing. I can’t believed they had 1.516 million units in 2010. That’s much better than I would have guessed.

  • avatar

    Contrast this with Ford or GM and it’s clear they are not out of the woods yet. Chrysler still has some niche vehicles and if they can stick a Hemi in it then the metal moves.
    When Fiat absorbs them fully and they start slapping the Chrysler badge on Fiats then we’ll see the deal. GM got away with branding Daewoos here with a bowtie, they might too.
    I still think we deserve free cars from them for bailing out. I’ll take my Challenger in Red please with the Hemi option.

    • 0 avatar

      “I still think we deserve free cars from them for bailing out.”
      That’s a good satirical response to those who say the interest on Federal loans is of little concern because, according to their logic, it’s money we are paying to ourselves.
      Well then, passing out free bail-out cars is simply providing cars to ourselves(taxpayers). So goes the thinking of people who actually believe the broken windows fallacy as a way to economic growth.

    • 0 avatar
      SVX pearlie

      Exactly. Ford made a solid profit this year. GM did good, and turned a bunch of cash back to the Feds.

      Chrysler, after the “restructuring” is still losing money. Not good.

  • avatar

    Hmm…I wonder if this is a case of ‘taking a bath’ before ‘suddenly’ posting great results next year. Especially with all the debt restructuring business they’re planning to do this year (why not last year then, ay?).

    I also wonder about the volume gains they’re planning on. Almost all of that will have to come from the US market now that they’re rebranding Dodge Journey’s into FIAT Freemonts and Sebrings into Lancias here in Europe. Not that they’d had been selling a whole lot of them anyway (here in the Netherlands for instance, both Dodge and Chrysler sold about 300 cars each last year, which translates to 0,06% market share…In 2001, Chrysler sold 5122 cars which was 0,97% market share, while Dodge wasn’t officially sold).

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • S2k Chris: “Remember brands like Sony and Toshiba and Panasonic and Sanyo and … ruled. Now not so much. Koreans...
  • S2k Chris: Maybe. Honestly, I wonder what percentage of Acuras are bought by prior Acura owners, who tend to be...
  • Jean-Pierre Sarti: i would do this: 1. get an OEM cap 2. install new hose (guessing it is the original?) 3. install...
  • kmars2009: I own a XG350L. It’s been reliable and solid. I think the Genesis brand is doing it right. The G90...
  • mriach77: [$38k for the V6 with AWD and $36K for the FWD V6 seems fine considering the new Camry V6 is $35K.] It does...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Mark Baruth, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States