Is There A Doctor In The House? Tata Tries To Revive Near-Dead Nano Sales

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Tata is doing everything possible to revive the shriveled sales of the Nano. Sales of the ultra-lowpriced Nano recently crashed to ultralow levels: In November, only 509 units changed hands, reluctantly. The success of the much hyped diminutive conveyance more and more looks like a flash in the pan, literally. The Nano became infamous for going up on flames. Then, Tata had to raise the ultralow price a few times. On top of that, Nano buyers were seen as bad credit risks by Indian banks and were hit with ultrahigh interest rates. Stir, simmer, and you have a recipe for disaster. Now, Tata has decided to fight back. However, the counter-offensive appears less inspired compared to the enthusiasm when the car was launched.

Tata now gives a four-year, 60,000km warranty on the Nano, up from 18 months or 24,000km, The Nikkei [sub] reports. Nothing earthshaking. Suzuki offers a three-year warranty on its Alto, Hyundai does the same for the Santro.

What else can Tata do? Financing. Forget about zero percent financing. Says the Nikkei: “Loans from State Bank of India, the nation’s largest commercial bank, run for seven years at annual interest of 8-11.5 percent. Most other banks offer 8-18 percent.” Before, Nano purchasers had to pay 15-19 percent, against about 11 percent for standard car loans. Has all the signs of too little, too late.

After long trials and tribulations, Tata openend a factory in Sanand that can produce 250,000 cars annually. According to The Nikkei, “accumulated shipments to November stand at only 71,326 cars.”

Ultra-lowcost cars are seen as a transitional phenomenon as a country moves towards mass motorization. Eventually, people want a real car with room for the family. Not too expensive. But also not too small. China had skipped the microcar stage completely, mass motorization was started with roomier 3-box cars such as the Santana or the Jetta, later joined by beefier Buicks. Small cars such as the Chery QQ are a recent phenomenon and all told do not command a dominating market share.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Mike C. Mike C. on Dec 17, 2010

    Perhaps they should borrow a name from Renault and re-christen it the Fuego...

  • MarcKyle64 MarcKyle64 on Dec 18, 2010

    You would think that the original VW Beetle would do well in India if people were looking for a reliable car that holds four.

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh I own my house 100% paid for at age 52. the answer is still NO.-28k (realistically) would take 8 years to offset my gas truck even with its constant repair bills (thanks chevy)-Still takes too long to charge UNTIL solidsate batteries are a thing and 80% in 15 minutes becomes a reality (for ME anyways, i get others are willing to wait)For the rest of the market, especially people in dense cityscape, apartments dens rentals it just isnt feasible yet IMO.
  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
  • THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
  • ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
Next