What's Wrong With This Picture: The Cimmaron Of The Future Edition

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: November 17th, 2010

what s wrong with this picture the cimmaron of the future edition

According to a recent projection, GM will be selling over 2m vehicles on its Gamma (Aveo) platform by 2016… and thanks to Cadillac’s Urban Luxury Concept, we know what the most profitable iteration of that platform could look like. Yes, it’s the new-wave Cimarron of the future, inspired by such pedigreed city-car competitors as the Aston-Martin Cygnet and the Bugatti Petit Sport Sang de Navet. And with Lambo doors and a grille that would put a crunk rapper to shame, the littlest Caddy certainly does everything it can to distract from its humble (presumably budget Korean hatchback) roots. Because, as lead designer Frank Saucedo puts it

There is no minimum size for a Cadillac driving experience.

But there is a minimum volume per platform target… and the importance of this metric almost guarantees that, in some way or another, the Cimarron will ride again.

#3WTP #Branding #CityCar #Concept #Design #FutureVehicles #Luxury #Platforms

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 36 comments

MadHungarian on Nov 17, 2010

Mistake, mistake, mistake. For a whole bunch of reasons other than the questionable styling, but let's start with these two: 1. The market for this sort of thing always gets overestimated. Real city dwellers, with no offstreet parking and mixing it up in cut and thrust traffic, will be happier with a Fit or a Cruze or a Fiesta. Not enough of them are going to spend Cadillac bucks for a car that's going to sit out on the street overnight, cost a bundle to insure, and doesn't do anything a Fit doesn't. And the ones who do buy it will outgrow it quickly, as soon as they have kids and/or move to the burbs. 2. Every dollar spent on developing and marketing this is a dollar diverted from doing what Cadillac needs desperately to do, which is revitalize the top end of its lineup with a RWD ultra luxury model that gives customers the best of the classiest big Caddies of yore - think '66 Fleetwood Brougham -- in a modern package. The XTS won't do that, being hemmed in by the limitations of the Epsilon platform (just like the MKS isn't doing it for Lincoln). Quick before it's too late, as everyone else is moving in on this market. Think Hyundai Equus, reviewed elsewhere on this site. Fix the front seats and it's ready to be the new DeVille. The LWB version (not coming to the US, bummer) could be the Fleetwood Brougham. I don't mean GM should sell rebadged Equuses as Caddies. I mean this is the kind of car Cadillac should be building, instead of ceding the market to Hyundai.

Like Reply
- PrincipalDan on Nov 17, 2010
  
  +1. Your part 2 made me think that 40 years from now car nuts will be sitting around saying: "Remember when Hyundai made cars like the Equus? Now the Chinese are eating their lunch and building real luxury sedans!"
  
  Like
Zenith on Apr 07, 2011

Too small to be a Caddy or Buick and too classy to be a Chevy. Split the grill vertically, put an Indian head on the steering wheel hub & revive Pontiac. This thing would make an awesome companion to my Aztek. And don't make versions of it for any other division.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.