Texas Cities Shut Down Cameras After Public Vote

The Newspaper
by The Newspaper

Red light cameras are no longer issuing tickets to motorists in America’s fourth-largest city. The Houston, Texas city council on Monday canvassed the results of the November 2 vote and ordered the cameras unplugged. In the nearby city of Baytown, red light cameras will be disabled at midnight on November 26.

“The voting public has spoken,” Houston City Attorney David M. Feldman wrote Monday in a letter to Jim Tuton, CEO of the camera contractor American Traffic Solutions (ATS). “Houston must follow the mandate of the electorate. Houston hereby terminates its contract with ATS. This termination is effective immediately. ATS is required to turn off all red light cameras installed and/or monitored by reason of the contract and ATS is to do so immediately.”

ATS is upset, and wants financial compensation, because the city terminated the ticketing contract before its 2014 expiration date. Given the massive amount of revenue generated by the program — $17,760,900 worth of tickets were mailed in 2009 — Houston Mayor Annise Parker initially attempted to ignore the results of the vote and to keep issuing tickets for another four months to cover the damages to ATS. It eventually became clear that Parker lacked the votes on the council for this option. On Monday, she filed suit in federal court against ATS.

“Houston… requests this court, after consideration, to declare the rights and obligations of the parties under the express terms of the contract,” Feldman wrote in the brief to the court. “Specifically, a controversy has arisen between Houston and ATS with respect to the interpretation of certain terms and conditions of the contract and parties’ rights and obligations with regard to termination of the contract in light of the results of the election on the Proposition 3 measure.”

For its part, ATS has pledged in public to cooperate fully while vowing to pursue the “difference of opinion” regarding the city’s contract termination payment obligation. US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Judge Lynn N. Hughes has scheduled a pretrial conference on the matter for February 7, 2011.

After Baytown shuts down its cameras next week, all of the photo enforcement elections for the year will be complete. Officials in Garfield Heights, Ohio shut down cameras immediately after seeing the will of the voters. Anaheim, California; Mukilteo, Washington and Sykesville, Maryland had cameras blocked before they could be installed (Anaheim’s referendum was sponsored by the mayor and city council who wanted to prevent future administrations from installing the devices). The relatively quick resolution of the 2010 elections contrasts sharply the attempt ATS made last year to have a judge cancel the red light camera ban. The victory proved Pyrrhic as the city’s politicians wanted nothing to do with a program soundly rejected at the ballot box.

[Courtesy: Thenewspaper.com]

The Newspaper
The Newspaper

More by The Newspaper

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 6 comments
  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Nov 17, 2010

    I don't blame ATS as much as I blame elected officials for the shell game they continue to try to play on those that elected them. The only hope here is that the voters that chose to boot ATS would also boot those officials that allowed it in, we can call it progress. Till then, it's just on to the next revenue generating scheme a la Chicago's selling of parking meters. Still, a victory is a victory. If anyone from ATS happens to be reading this, please know that I cheer your defeat. Go play in traffic, preferably traffic near one of your cameras.

  • FleetofWheel FleetofWheel on Nov 17, 2010

    What paper tigers city hall and TSA turn out to be when they get corrected by the ballot box and public outcry. Hopefully, similar ballot initiatives will be used in other localities.

  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next