By on November 12, 2010

GM appears to be sick of the constant needling it receives about their Wuling joint venture in China. Here is a company that produces half of the 2 million cars GM proudly announced as theirs in China, and GM owns only 34 percent. (The 37 percent that had been bandied about apparently were also exaggerated.) 50.1 percent are owned by SAIC, the rest by Wuling. Contractually, GM is entitled to pull the wool over the heads of the world and OICA, and count the millions of diminutive Wulings as theirs. Now, GM is taking steps to redeem themselves. Or to redeem some of the IPO take. But just a little.

The Wall Street Journal says that GM plans to increase its stake in the Wuling joint venture to a breathtaking 44 percent. SAIC would remain in the driver’s seat and keep 50.1 percent. Wuling will hold the bag and 5.9 percent of the stock.

GM says this is “part of efforts to integrate the Chinese operation more into the global operation.” Well, after the production numbers had been integrated for years, it’s time to bring the rest more into the fold.

In an updated IPO prospectus, GM says it has entered into an agreement to purchase an additional 10 percent interest in SAIC GM Wuling Automobile Co. for $51 million in cash from a third joint-venture partner, Wuling Group. GM said it also agreed to provide technical services to Wuling Group through 2013. The transaction is subject to regulatory approval in China.

So GM got 10 percent of a company that builds more than a million cars a year for a pittance of $51m? That’s less than the MSRP of a Gulfstream V. There are still bargains to be had in China. And most likely some customary dealings under the table. Let’s see what those “technical services” will be.

GM needs more Wuling for two real reasons:

  • The cheap boxes are selling like hotcakes in China, especially in the rural areas. Although recently, their growth has been lagging the market.
  • GM needs them for its joint foray into India (together with SAIC).

According to the WSJ, “most of GM’s product offerings, from gas-guzzling big pickup trucks to subcompacts, are generally too pricey for buyers looking for low-cost, no-frills cars in emerging markets. Boxy Wuling microcars, priced around $4,000, are more suitable for India and other similar markets.”

GM’s future in international growth markets hinges on a company in Liuzhou (ever heard of it?) and a brand popular amongst poor farmers.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!


3 Comments on “GM Gets A Deal In China: 10% Of Wuling For $51m...”

  • avatar

    Plenty of poor farmers down there.  The city is, IMHO, a hole, but the area outside it arguably the most beautiful in the whole country.

  • avatar

    Can you try to be a bit more patronising, please. You might not have heard of it, but it is well known in China. Who has heard of your hometown?
    I have lived in Liuzhou for 15 years. And far from being full of poor farmers (farmers tend not to live in cities) it is the richest city in the province in terms of contribution to the tax income.
    Hole? No. Beautiful? Yes.

  • avatar

    I would agree on your analysis of why GM needs Wuling.    Also Wuling needs GM for all the same reasons.   
    This closer relationship gives GM/SAIC the future option to follow the Foxconn model of lower manufacturing costs by getting out of the big cities.  When I was in Liuzhou there was a lot of open space in the area.  The present Wuling campus could be the hub.        

Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Re: QOTD: When Will the Crossover Call It Quits?

    WallMeerkat - It’s the same story over in UK/Ireland/Western Europe – every manufacturer now pumps out CUVs, in many cases axing slow selling...
  • Re: Junkyard Find: 1988 Nissan Pulsar NX

    rpn453 - You never know when a pick-up tackle football game might happen! It was a common occurrence for me in the 80’s.
  • Re: No Fixed Abode: Dealers Gone Wild!

    Scoutdude - I’m sorry but I don’t think that she was particularly scammed. Sure she could have probably negotiated a little better price and rate but it...
  • Re: No Fixed Abode: Dealers Gone Wild!

    Scoutdude - Well thankfully in our state the doc fee is capped at $150 and the dealer must state at least in advertising that it is a negotiable fee. Either way I agree...
  • Re: QOTD: What Was The Most Desirable Mid-Sizer Ever?

    Paragon - Agreed, Steve. Always thought that generation of Camry looked like a pretty good car. And, likewise, still see many of those on the road daily.
  • Re: Piston Slap: Foiled by a Dome Light?

    rpn453 - The Panasonic in my ’04 Mazda3 is now over 12 years old and still going strong. I’ve only topped up the electrolyte level once.
  • Re: No Fixed Abode: Dealers Gone Wild!

    Scoutdude - As others have mentioned she is so upside down in the loan that it is unlikely she can refinance for anywhere near the amount due. In general I agree that...
  • Re: QOTD: What Was The Most Desirable Mid-Sizer Ever?

    Paragon - I have (2) co-workers who both own G6s. Have neither ridden in nor driven one to be able to evaluate it. They have always looked pretty good....
  • Re: No Fixed Abode: Dealers Gone Wild!

    -Nate - Wow ~ so informative in all aspects of new vehicle purchasing . . No wonder the three times I’ve purchased new were for cash and even then I prolly got...
  • Re: No Fixed Abode: Dealers Gone Wild!

    Paragon - ToorusGT500, I’ve heard that radio ad, too. And, like you I thought that most people need to pay for food and rent and utility bills, along with gas and...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote


  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Seth Parks, United States
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Kyree Williams, United States