GM Board Member: The IPO Is Premature

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Ready to buy some GM share tomorrow? A consummate insider who sits on the board of an important GM company says: Don’t.

Klaus-Franz, Chair of the Opel works council and Vice Chairman of the Opel supervisory board warns: “The IPO is premature. Sure, GM has delivered three good quarters. But he restructuring in Europe must be finished to give investors the visibility they need.”

Franz knows the skeletons hidden in Opel’s closet. In an interview with Germany’s Focus Magazine, Franz gives valuable investment advice to potential GM shareholders. To repeat: “Don’t.”

“Due to the insolvency of GM, many projects were left undone. That’s why Opel is not in good shape. Models like the Astra Convertible, or new engines – everything has been delayed. There was no money for these projects. We have a two year innovation gap. The projects that will be launched in 2012 are impressive . After that, profits will be possible, because the restructuring is behind us.”

One of the problems of Opel is hat GM pretty much locked them into Europe. Other companies can export themselves out of the crisis and weather weak European sales. A sick Opel has to live of a sick European market. Will GM allow Opel to enter foreign markets in a meaningful way?

“I see some movement in that regard, but it’s slow going. We won’t get healthier by getting smaller. Profits come from products and expansion. Opel must be globalized. Russia, China, India are the big topics. We need to be in Russia urgently. GM underestimates the opportunities there.“

Maybe they don’t underestimate the opportunities. But quite possibly, they want to exploit them for Chevrolet, Buick et al, and not for a moribund Opel. Franz still thinks a Magna as an owner would have given Opel more drive, and that GM as an owner is a drag:

“There still is too much red tape and inefficiency. Instead of using the talents of the European engineers for profitable development work, their time is wasted in presentations and discussions of process sequences. Very little has changed in the corporate culture. There still are too many chiefs and only the indians are being reduced.”

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 6 comments
  • John Horner John Horner on Nov 17, 2010

    Franz has an axe to grind and wants to keep throwing sand in the gears of progress. Calling him a "GM Board Member" is in fact a misleading headline, but such seems to be the norm on the 'net these days. Anything for page views!

  • Jkross22 Jkross22 on Nov 17, 2010

    Interesting that the comments have zero'd in on the guy's union ties as opposed to whether what he has said is factually correct. Saying he has an ax to grind avoids addressing his accusation. I wonder if those critical of the article agree with the "GM still has too much red tape/inefficiencies/wasted time/corporate culture problems...." accusations. Again, since it was a faux bankruptcy and the swamp wasn't really drained, but simply skimmed, GM carried forward a lot of off balance sheet baggage that has only slowly been jettisoned.

    • Chris Haak Chris Haak on Nov 17, 2010

      holydonut commented above on Opel's place in the larger GM. Opel is certainly a problem (and a money pit), but Klaus-Franz is narrowly looking only at the IPO as it pertains to Opel's situation, and not GM as a whole. Maybe the IPO is too early, and maybe it's not. Suppose the Q4 results aren't as favorable as Q3's were (which Liddell basically said would be the case); that could very easily drive down the IPO price. Also, I agree with those who contend that this is a misleading headline. He's not a GM board member, he's an Opel Supervisory Board member. There is a big, big difference between the two.

  • ToolGuy I do like the fuel economy of a 6-cylinder engine. Will be watching this with interest. 😉
  • Carson D I'd go with the RAV4. It will last forever, and someone will pay you for it if you ever lose your survival instincts.
  • THX1136 A less expensive EV would make it more attractive. For the record, I've never purchased a brand new vehicle as I have never been able to afford anything but used. I think the same would apply to an EV. I also tend to keep a vehicle way longer than most folks do - 10+ years. If there was a more affordable one right now then other things come to bear. There are currently no chargers in my immediate area (town of 16K). I don't know if I can afford to install the necessary electrical service to put one in my car port right now either. Other than all that, I would want to buy what I like from a cosmetic standpoint. That would be a Charger EV which, right now, doesn't exist and I couldn't afford anyway. I would not buy an EV just to be buying an EV. Nothing against them either. Most of my constraints are purely financial being 71 with a disabled wife and on a fixed income.
  • ToolGuy Two more thoughts, ok three:a) Will this affordable EV have expressive C/D pillars, detailing on the rocker panels and many many things happening around the headlamps? Asking for a friend.b) Will this affordable EV have interior soft touch plastics and materials lifted directly from a European luxury sedan? Because if it does not, the automotive journalists are going to mention it and that will definitely spoil my purchase decision.c) Whatever the nominal range is, I need it to be 2 miles more, otherwise no deal. (+2 rule is iterative)
  • Zerofoo No.My wife has worked from home for a decade and I have worked from home post-covid. My commute is a drive back and forth to the airport a few times a year. My every-day predictable commute has gone away and so has my need for a charge at home commuter car.During my most recent trip I rented a PHEV. Avis didn't bother to charge it, and my newly renovated hotel does not have chargers on the property. I'm not sure why rental fleet buyers buy plug-in vehicles.Charging infrastructure is a chicken and egg problem that will not be solved any time soon.
Next