Chevy Truck Ads: Less Howie Long, More Old Spice Guy

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Yes, things have changed in the world of trucks. Selling Chevrolet pickups was once a simple task, requiring little more sophistication than the average locker room put-down. In this now-bygone time, spokesmen for Chevy trucks were football players, and advertisements either showed a Silverado busting some dirt, or a Ford owner flitting about like Ryan Seacrest at a Justin Bieber concert. Overt, in-your-face masculinity was the currency of this era in truck advertising… until Dodge went and ruined it all by raising macho truck-ad values to the level of the absurd with its laughable “My Tank Is Full” spots (to be fair though, the paradigm was collapsing under its own weight anyway).

All of a sudden, an earnest repetition of hard-working, masculine values alone just wouldn’t cut it in the world of truck advertising anymore. What truck ads needed was a little bit of irony. Some humor to go with all the horsepower numbers, the celebrations of rugged durability, and yes, even the childish put-downs of the competition. So Chevy watched a lot of “Old Spice Guy” ads, hired some comedians and made it happen… with hilarious results.

Perhaps the most significant reaction that occurred when irony and truck ads first collided: Chevy’s marketers realized that casual, coded homophobia just isn’t funny. Especially when your two new spokesmen spend a lot of time alone in a mountain lodge talking with smoldering passion about their close working relationship (not to mention “torsional stiffness”). Needless to say, this new approach required a new formulation: instead of portraying Ford owners as a bunch of effete pansies, Chevy could simply compare the competition to a baby. You know, because it lacks experience or something. Plus, Ford trucks poop their pants!

Yes, really. You stay classy, truck ads.


Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • Bunkie Bunkie on Nov 08, 2010

    I seem to remember reading that the Old Spice commercials came out of market research that indicated that an awful lot of women bought the product for their men, so they decided to aim the ad at women. Like it or not, the ad is memorable, which is not really something new for Old Spice as I'm sure many of us who are old enough can still whistle the tune that was a fixture of their ads from the '60s.

  • Advance_92 Advance_92 on Nov 08, 2010

    To be honest I'd probably pause to listen to a commercial where Patrick Warburton read the phone book. Not that it would induce me to buy a pickup truck. But it would get the name recognition out there. All they need to do is dress the baby up a little bit to look like Mike Rowe and those ads would be over the top silly. As is they look a little unfinished.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next