Carmageddon's Real Victim: Auto R&D Down $12b in 2009

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The car business has endured a lot of bad news over the last several years, as finance-fueled sales crashed with the credit market, and automakers around the world scrambled for government aid. The so-called “Carmageddon” has touched everyone even remotely involved with the automotive industry, not to mention everyone who pays taxes, but from a strictly consumer perspective, it hasn’t been all bad. Certainly the deals have been good, as programs like Cash For Clunkers and the wind-down of several brands have helped savvy shoppers find some of the best deals in a long time. So here’s the reality check: according to Booz & Co.’s Global Innovation 1000 study, spending on research and development by the auto sector was down $12b last year. That’s $12b that should have been spent making your car faster, smarter, safer, cleaner, better that’s no longer being spent. Still feeling untouched?

And yes, this is a problem that’s unique to the auto industry. As one of the report’s authors tells Wards

If you look at the data, (auto makers) cut R&D to sustain their business models. As a percentage of their total revenue, it’s not just the largest dollar amount cut but also the largest percentage reduction of any industry we followed.

And he’s not kidding. In 2008, Toyota was the top R&D-spending company in the world. After a billion and a half dollars in cuts, they’re number four [memo to Toyota, update the file]. In fact, Volkswagen was the only major automaker to not reduce R&D spending last year, as most of the majors shed at least a billion dollars trying to keep their heads above water. It would be premature to predict the onset of 1970s-style automotive malaise based on one year of cuts alone, but unless all those missing billions were being wasted, their absence will be felt in new cars at some point.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 12 comments
  • Fusion Fusion on Nov 09, 2010

    Anybody know how these numbers are derived / calculated? I only checked for Volkswagen Group, but their annual financial report for 2009 states 5.429 Million € in "Research and Development cost recognized in the income statement" - which would translate to ~7,2 billion dollars (todays exchange rate).

    • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on Nov 09, 2010

      On 12/31/09, the EUR bought 1.4333 USD (not too far from what it buys today.) Which translates into exactly 7.78 billion USD. In the words of a - sadly deceased - old school VW board member whom I remember fondly: "Never trust a statistic unless you forged it yourself." Next to saving on advertising, saving on R&D is a great and quick fix to make your books look better. Both will bite you in the butt a few years later. R&D savings have a much bigger bite.

  • John Horner John Horner on Nov 09, 2010

    " ... but unless all those missing billions were being wasted, .... "

    The law of diminishing returns certainly applies to R&D spending by the big companies. There is also the issue of making good use of global resources. Ford, for example, was duplicating efforts across a host of brands, platforms and regional development centers without getting a corresponding product return for all those billions being spent. Even post cuts, Ford spent almost $5B on R&D in 2009. That is a lot of money.

    Sometimes having too much money flowing through the labs and design studios can be just as bad as having too little.

  • SCE to AUX All that lift makes for an easy rollover of your $70k truck.
  • SCE to AUX My son cross-shopped the RAV4 and Model Y, then bought the Y. To their surprise, they hated the RAV4.
  • SCE to AUX I'm already driving the cheap EV (19 Ioniq EV).$30k MSRP in late 2018, $23k after subsidy at lease (no tax hassle)$549/year insurance$40 in electricity to drive 1000 miles/month66k miles, no range lossAffordable 16" tiresVirtually no maintenance expensesHyundai (for example) has dramatically cut prices on their EVs, so you can get a 361-mile Ioniq 6 in the high 30s right now.But ask me if I'd go to the Subaru brand if one was affordable, and the answer is no.
  • David Murilee Martin, These Toyota Vans were absolute garbage. As the labor even basic service cost 400% as much as servicing a VW Vanagon or American minivan. A skilled Toyota tech would take about 2.5 hours just to change the air cleaner. Also they also broke often, as they overheated and warped the engine and boiled the automatic transmission...
  • Marcr My wife and I mostly work from home (or use public transit), the kid is grown, and we no longer do road trips of more than 150 miles or so. Our one car mostly gets used for local errands and the occasional airport pickup. The first non-Tesla, non-Mini, non-Fiat, non-Kia/Hyundai, non-GM (I do have my biases) small fun-to-drive hatchback EV with 200+ mile range, instrument display behind the wheel where it belongs and actual knobs for oft-used functions for under $35K will get our money. What we really want is a proper 21st century equivalent of the original Honda Civic. The Volvo EX30 is close and may end up being the compromise choice.
Next