Testing Times For Toyota Aren't So Testing?

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

When the whole “acceler-gate” scandal broke out, there were, pretty much, two reactions.

1. OH MY GOD!!!!!! STOP DRIVING YOUR TOYOTAS!!!!!! WE’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!!!!!!!!

And 2. Witch-hunt. Witch-hunt. Witch-hunt!

Well, irrespective of who was right, an investigation of the whole affair needed to happen. The US government did an investigation of their own and didn’t like the results. But Toyota also did an investigation of its own. They found something.

Business Week reports that ToMoCo is auditing of their suppliers of their highest priority parts in North America. What Toyota found, so far, was surprising. Toyota is finding that some parts aren’t being tested as rigorously as Toyota thought. Toyota thought that certain parts were tested four times a year; it was closer to once a year.

“We have found areas where maybe there was a misunderstanding about some aspect of the process,” said Dino Triantafyllos, vice president of product quality for Toyota North America, “These improvements we’re making, if we’d made them two years ago, maybe some of these issues wouldn’t have happened.” But didn’t this whole debacle stem from a pedal design which was prone to sticking (which is still a dodgy theory)?

Hiroshi Osada, leader of a panel formed by the Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers to help Toyota boost its quality, said “The crisis was a problem that came from the design-development stage,” He also added that closer examination of components “should be able to help prevent quality defects.” In other words, TEST YOUR PRODUCTS MORE!!!

In a strange quirk of fate, CTS, the supplier of the pedal in question, was one of the first suppliers audited by Toyota (I can’t think why). But CTS has nothing to fear. “They remain a supplier,” said Mr Triantafyllos, “We have a good relationship with them.” That’s nice.

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
 3 comments
  • Mark MacInnis Mark MacInnis on Oct 15, 2010

    I am "surprised" that Toyota is "surprised'. Having spent the better part of the last two decades beating up the supplier base for cost reductions (yes, I know. They are not NEARLY as stupid about this as the D3 were/are....) Toyota is "surprised" that suppliers took out cost (or, shall I say, reserved a little money for their other stakeholders) by cutting back a bit on quality testing? Cue the scene from Casablanca about gambling-shocked police chiefs and their winnings and so on.... The whole scam of the Toyota and Honda American keiretsu's is that the money, and therefore the strategic power, accrues to the top. Toyota's suppliers are actually under the complete thrall of Toyota purchasing. The whole thing would be ripe for the Justice department's anti-trust department due to the complete lack of competitive bidding, if the DoJ wasn't completely brain dead under the last several administrations. Anyone who reads Toyota's report and doesn't realize that this is self-serving Toyota propaganda, that by throwing a few suppliers under the bus (Bad supplier! Bad! Now go stand in the corner!) they are deflecting their own accountability. Their hasn't been a true arms-length purchase transaction in the Toyota keiretsu since....well, since ever! Toyota knew. Or they should have known. Anyone believes anything else, I have a slightly used ES350 to sell you. Only driven to church on Sunday by a little old lady from Pomona. She never, ever engaged the cruise control. Seriously. I mean it.

    • See 1 previous
    • Thirty-three Thirty-three on Oct 15, 2010

      Competitive bidding? What for? Toyota is not a government agency spending tax dollars.

  • Douglas This timeframe of Mercedes has the self-disintegrating engine wiring harness. Not just the W124, but all of them from the early 90's. Only way to properly fix it is to replace it, which I understand to be difficult to find a new one/do it/pay for. Maybe others have actual experience with doing so and can give better hope. On top of that, it's a NH car with "a little bit of rust", which means to about anyone else in the USA it is probably the rustiest W124 they have ever seen. This is probably a $3000 car on a good day.
  • Formula m How many Hyundai and Kia’s do not have the original engine block it left the factory with 10yrs prior?
  • 1995 SC I will say that year 29 has been a little spendy on my car (Motor Mounts, Injectors and a Supercharger Service since it had to come off for the injectors, ABS Pump and the tool to cycle the valves to bleed the system, Front Calipers, rear pinion seal, transmission service with a new pan that has a drain, a gaggle of capacitors to fix the ride control module and a replacement amplifier for the stereo. Still needs an exhaust manifold gasket. The front end got serviced in year 28. On the plus side blank cassettes are increasingly easy to find so I have a solid collection of 90 minute playlists.
  • MaintenanceCosts My own experiences with, well, maintenance costs:Chevy Bolt, ownership from new to 4.5 years, ~$400*Toyota Highlander Hybrid, ownership from 3.5 to 8 years, ~$2400BMW 335i Convertible, ownership from 11.5 to 13 years, ~$1200Acura Legend, ownership from 20 to 29 years, ~$11,500***Includes a new 12V battery and a set of wiper blades. In fairness, bigger bills for coolant and tire replacement are coming in year 5.**Includes replacement of all rubber parts, rebuild of entire suspension and steering system, and conversion of car to OEM 16" wheel set, among other things
  • Jeff Tesla should not be allowed to call its system Full Self-Driving. Very dangerous and misleading.
Next