NHTSA Hearts Toyota. You Did Read Right

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Everybody, please help me out here and look out of the window: Is the sun rising in the west? No? Are clocks running backwards? No? Then WTH is going on? NHTSA Chief David Strickland praised, yes praised automakers for their dispatch on recalls, and wait until you hear this: Strickland gave a gold star to Toyota for its improvements.

All that happened in an unprecedented interview with the Detroit News. Basically, Strickland says that automakers are playing ball, even after the NHTSA has “increased the pace” of their investigations.

Automakers are making “the right decisions in terms of safety and consumers,” Strickland says. And wonders of wonders, Strickland doesn’t take credit for that. Are the automakers suddenly good, good boys, because the NHTSA got hardnosed? No way, says Strickland

“I don’t think there’s anything that’s changed in the core DNA of what we do here at NHTSA.” See, he even picks up the favorite word in the industry, DNA. (Which formerly stood for “defect not acknowledged.” Even that has changed. Over to you …)

However, Srickland concedes that the NHTSA is opening investigations faster, and after fewer complaints. He also admits that the NHTSA “has taken a harder line with automakers in some cases.” But a change in DNA? Nah.

In this year, automakers have recalled about 15m vehicles in about 500 separate campaigns. (Did you notice that we went back to ignoring most of them? We’d be Thehalftruthaboutrecalls.com, if we wouldn’t.)

As far as Toyota goes, you know, the company Strickland’s boss LaHood had called “safety deaf”, Strickland has nothing but praise. He extols a “change in how Toyota approaches defects” and says that Toyota is “working very hard to be a better company going forward.”

“Toyota really is taking safety much more seriously than they did before I took office,” says Strickland, who started running NHTSA January.

Toyota’s reaction? Thanks for the flowers, but the praise should go to the industry as a whole. The “whole recall landscape has kind of changed since our own incident,” and all automakers are now expected to be “forthcoming” said Toyota vice president of product communications, Jim Colon.

So everybody is lovey-dovey again? No bad feelings? Witch hunt, what witch hunt?

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 4 comments
  • Asapuntz Asapuntz on Oct 23, 2010

    i've said it before (somewhere :-), i'll say it again. the optimistic interpretation is that the NHTSA doesn't have the resources to micro-manage the development of electronic technologies in critical car systems, so they crack down hard on Toyota because - Toyota will actually improve its products and processes - other automakers will copy those products and processes

    • Musiccitymafia Musiccitymafia on Oct 23, 2010

      Hmm, pretty optimistic but also pretty simplistic. Maybe Strickland brought all this hearty intelligence with him when he became the chief.

  • AaronH AaronH on Oct 24, 2010

    Taxpayer-teat-sucking Vogon. Parasite.

  • SaulTigh Unless we start building nuclear plants and beefing up the grid, this drive to electrification (and not just cars) will be the destruction of modern society. I hope you love rolling blackouts like the US was some third world failed state. You don't support 8 billion people on this planet without abundant and relatively cheap energy.So no, I don't want an electric car, even if it's cheap.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Lou_BCone of many cars I sold when I got commissioned into the army. 1964 Dodge D100 with slant six and 3 on the tree, 1973 Plymouth Duster with slant six, 1974 dodge dart custom with a 318. 1990 Bronco 5.0 which was our snowboard rig for Wa state and Whistler/Blackcomb BC. Now :my trail rigs are a 1985 Toyota FJ60 Land cruiser and 86 Suzuki Samurai.
  • RHD They are going to crash and burn like Country Garden and Evergrande (the Chinese property behemoths) if they don't fix their problems post-haste.
  • Golden2husky The biggest hurdle for us would be the lack of a good charging network for road tripping as we are at the point in our lives that we will be traveling quite a bit. I'd rather pay more for longer range so the cheaper models would probably not make the cut. Improve the charging infrastructure and I'm certainly going to give one a try. This is more important that a lowish entry price IMHO.
  • Add Lightness I have nothing against paying more to get quality (think Toyota vs Chryco) but hate all the silly, non-mandated 'stuff' that automakers load onto cars based on what non-gearhead focus groups tell them they need to have in a car. I blame focus groups for automatic everything and double drivetrains (AWD) that really never gets used 98% of the time. The other 2% of the time, one goes looking for a place to need it to rationanalize the purchase.
Next