By on October 14, 2010

So, how does the maker of the world’s cheapest mass-market car go about building India’s first home-grown upscale crossover? First, go buy several small European automakers…

Tata’s Carl-Peter Forster tells The Hindu that

the product has been developed with some inputs from Tata Jaguar-Land Rover with regard to the interiors. But it is a car created for India at the Engineering Centre in Pune and manufactured in Pune.

Reports in the Indian media vary, but but they range from talk of a JLR-led “interior makeover” to such claims as

JLR technology know- how is injected into Aria regarding harshness, vibration, noise faults and overall finishing… Tata Aria will make a road for Tata’s dependency on JLR technical backup for almost every segment.

All models have a 2.2 liter diesel engine making 137 hp and AWD, as well as navigation, ESP, and six airbags. Accordingly, Indian-market prices are in the properly “upscale crossover” $30-$35k range [prices converted from rupees, and reflect local market conditions]. Still, it’s got that “biggest Nano on the block” look, that lets you have your GPS navigation and “European interior” while still keeping it real for the ‘hood. Speaking of Europe, Mahindra has put the Italian, Spanish and Polish markets on notice to expect an Aria in their area “within a year.”

And the US market? According to Forster, Tata is a long way from a US launch. Why?

One has to be able to do U.S.-wide sales. The U.S. market is one of the last markets we could enter. There are so many which are easier, cheaper and quicker to enter

Jaguar-Land Rover don’t mind helping with the Aria’s interior, but they’re damned if they’ll share dealership space with it.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

22 Comments on “Luxury… By Tata...”


  • avatar
    86er

    Oooh, a giant Dodge Caliber, my dream car!

  • avatar
    Zackman

    Nah, a flattened-out Honda CR-V!

    Seriously, these guys and others like them are the players to watch. They may have something there. We are all tired of succeeding models of cars getting fat; first, from the domestics, then the imports got in on the act to where we are today. Car magazines have complained about that for over forty years, but they don’t listen.

    As for Tata and other players, the U.S. market is unique, though. It appears that what sells very well around the world, either flops here, or doesn’t make it here to begin with. Why? I don’t have a answer for that. That’s for TTAC to answer, or contributors that have much more market insight than I do.

    Personally, I want a usable, reliable, comfortable (without over-doing the interior with all the intrusions and massive consoles that trap you), attractive (to me), economic vehicle for my commuting and general transportation needs. Oh, yeah, the rear windows must roll down, too! The days of my old, stunningly beautiful ’64 Chevy shown above are never returning, and I’m O.K. with that. Current realities demand vehicles with utility for many people, and if you can make a square box gorgeous, so much the better. Show me one in addition to what’s out there now.

    • 0 avatar
      SunnyvaleCA

      “It appears that what sells very well around the world, either flops here, or doesn’t make it here to begin with. Why?”

      A few differences I can think of:  different culture, wide roads, lots of free parking (in most places), and cheap gas (especially compared to people’s income).  As for that Tata vehicle’s engine, it would be considered underpowered here and wouldn’t meet pollution requirements. It would probably be the country’s only stick-shift minivan, though!

    • 0 avatar
      rkap

      LOL. Many of the guys here don’t seem to realise how big companies work. This Aria is designed for India and India like markets. PERIOD. It is foolish to compare with US driver needs. If and when Tata’s decide to do a car for US market, they WILL design it to match US needs. BTW, ALL US car makers were a big flop is India. Although Tata group is in business since 1868 and make trucks and such vehicles for 65 years, they are making cars for only 12 years. If they have made enough splash in such a short time even in markets they don’t sell Tata cars, I must say they are doing extremely good job. Don’t forget that people have written off Toyota’s hondas once upon a time just like this,

  • avatar
    jmo

    I could have sworn Homer Simpson designed a car just like that….

  • avatar
    Truckducken

    It has windows!  I like it.

  • avatar
    basho

    It’s strange to see a SUV/CUV looking thing without the tinted windows. 

  • avatar
    cdotson

    I knew Suzuki was big in India, but I didn’t know an SX4 could take that many steroids.

  • avatar
    don1967

    Not a bad-looking vehicle, despite resembling a Kia minivan with Nissan headlights and Honda CRV greenhouse. I also see the Dodge Journey in there somewhere, but can’t quite put my finger on it.

    Seriously though, I hope it has traction control.  It looks very tall and narrow… like a deck of cards standing on edge.

  • avatar
    Amendment X

    Interior looks like a 1999 Infiniti.

  • avatar
    musiccitymafia

    “India’s first home-grown upscale crossover”??

    Not sure if “crossover” is the right noun here.  Seems to me the generally accepted definition of a crossover is something between a Car and an SUV (a truck with features). This thing seems to be somewhere between a Minivan and a Car. Maybe a new class is required.

  • avatar
    wallstreet

    What happened to rear pillars? It disappears ??

  • avatar
    daga

    Why is Mahindra announcing where this will be sold?

  • avatar
    FloorIt

    The Ice Road Truckers in India drive a Tata truck which has the cab made of wood and the animation shows what happens if it hits something. (Kaboom!) Are they going to use the same animation for this in a tv ad?

  • avatar
    M 1

    Faux-luxury worked great for Lexus and Inifiniti, and the Indian market has the significant advantage of considerably reduced standards. As for the confusion about how to categorize this vaguely ugly anonynopod, it looks all minivan to me. US launch? Look, they’ve wrecked the underpinnings of our IT infrastructure with lowest-bidder quality, let’s not encourage them to kill us bodily on the highways as well. Let them experiment on the Europeans first. Normally I curse the NHTSA, EPA, and The Majestic 50 DOTs, but in Tata’s case maybe they’re on to something.

  • avatar
    newfdawg

    The front end reminds me of a Ford Focus, the side profile a Dodge Caliber.  The interior doesn’t blow me away, the wood trim on the dashboard looks really cheap, like contact paper maybe.
    A really big question mark will be the quality and reliability; given the proclivity of the Nano to
    catch on fire, let the Europeans experiment with it first.

  • avatar
    Tstag

    It looks quite good, you can tell JLR breathed on the interior because the fit and finish looks much better than anything TATA have managed to date. If they upgrade the interior and ditch the faux wood then I think it would sell in Europe, but maybe put a Rover badge on it and sell it in Land Rover dealers.

  • avatar
    bugo

    Why are Indian cars so stodgy?  This thing is stodgy. The Mahindra truck is very stodgy. The Nano is just ridiculous looking.  I could do a better job styling cars than they do.

  • avatar
    porschespeed

    I like my Tatas pert and firm.
     
    If largish flopping is part of this deal, I think I’ll pass thanks.

  • avatar
    GrandCharles

    This is the best after the Lacrosse namepicking by buick…in french tata mean being dumb and aria means lots of problem so it’s a dumb lots of problem!!! I just wish they bring it here for the laugh!!!


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Re: 2017 Dodge Challenger GT: Fun in the Snow With a Little Less Go

    danio3834 - Last winter, I took a 2016 Chrysler 300S AWD to compete in a Rally Cross Ice Race. In the non-studded AWD class of 11 cars, I...
  • Re: Maybe Ford’s Not so Bad? Ex-CEO Mulally in Running for Secretary of State

    mtmmo - *YAWN* You’re a bore ass.
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    Jeff Zekas - Last time I hitched was in the late 70’s. Only one bad ride, a gay guy making passes. After the killing of the nurse in Santa Barbara, lots of folks stopped...
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    la834 - The first time I ever heard the word “hitchhike” was when a third-grade teacher told us on the first day of school that year of his summer adventures,...
  • Re: Maybe Ford’s Not so Bad? Ex-CEO Mulally in Running for Secretary of State

    mikein541 - I’d rather he be considered for Sec Def. Marine Generals are fine as members of Joint Chiefs of Staff, but...
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    JohnTaurus_3.0_AX4N - I have never set out with the intention of hitching a ride. I have accepted rides from strangers, like a young woman in an Omnrizon with two little boys...
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    mikein541 - I’m 70 years old. As a young teenager growing up just outside Washington DC, my buddies and I hitched everywhere, when we weren’t riding our bicycles....
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    mshenzi - Hitchiked a ton in the early 1980s, during 18 months of bumming around East, Central and Southern Africa. Got picked up by all kinds of folks– local Africans...
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    krhodes1 - That’s pretty funny! I have never hitched in the US, though I did pick up a couple of hitchhikers in college – I’ve always had a car. But I...
  • Re: QOTD: Hitchin’ A Ride?

    7402 - Used to both hitch and give rides back in the 1970s-1980s. That ended in the summer of ’82 when I got picked up on PCH by 3 guys and a girl in an old Dodge...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Seth Parks, United States
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Kyree Williams, United States