By on October 5, 2010

Handed out to undeserved recipients and devalued by lazy writers alike, few words are as hackneyed as iconic or legendary. If everything is an iconic legend, nothing is. Sometimes, though, the words are exactly appropriate. The Canadian American Challenge Cup racing series which ran from 1966 to 1974, more popularly known simply as Can-Am, included cars and drivers that are truly iconic and the series was genuinely the stuff of legend. Though the big block V8 engines of Can-Am last roared over 35 years ago, even today the name Can-Am resonates strongly with car enthusiasts.

Attracted by an almost unlimited technical formula and some of the era’s richest purses, the world’s most innovative constructors and talented drivers flocked to the series. Team owners that have since succeeded in other series like Roger Penske, Jim Hall, Paul Newman and Carl Haas, were active in Can-Am. This was when drivers were not specialists who only raced in this or that series, and many of the Can-Am drivers also raced in Formula One. Not only were some of the drivers the same in both F1 and Can-Am, the two series also raced on some of the same tracks. The Can-Am cars were so technologically advanced, so powerful and so fast that the F1 drivers typically set faster times with their Can-Am cars than with their F1 rides. The series produced technical advancements that still impact racing. Can-Am was so larger than life, that it eventually produced the most powerful car ever designed to race on a closed course, a car which so dominated the series, it is said to have killed that very racing series that spawned it. As I said, the stuff of legend.

Befitting such a larger than life subject, one of the truly golden ages of 20th century auto racing, David Bull Publishing has released Can-Am Cars In Detail: Machines And Minds Racing Unrestrained, with photos by Peter Harholdt and text by respected racing journalist Pete Lyons. It’s a large format book, ~ 11″X11″, hardcover, 244 pages, with a slip case. Noted in passing is that this is yet another graphically rich book printed in China. Apparently the publishing industry is outsourcing to China too.

Because of the large format I’m tempted to call CACID a coffee table book but that would be doing Lyons and Harholdt and their publisher a huge disservice. Yes the book has gorgeous, large photographs of 22 of the coolest cars ever built, all either restored, as-raced or in one case, recreated, but it’s much more than a picture book. CACID gives a vivid sense of what Can-Am was like, showing the variety of cars raced (with their achievements or lack thereof), and their chronological development. What makes CACID different than more cursory looks at Can-Am is that in addition to the legendary Can-Am cars that everyone recognizes, like the Chaparral 2E, Lola T70, McLaren 6 and 8 models, and Porsche 917s, there are lesser remembered marques like Genie, Caldwell, McKee and Honker. Honker? There are cars that won races and championships, cars that were innovative but not very successful, and some backmarkers as well. Lyons and Harholdt’s selection of cars gives a comprehensive view of the series. The “In Detail” part is no brag, just fact. Harholdt’s photographs are visually arresting, the framing and lighting present the cars like the mechanical art that they are, and Lyons’ text treats each car’s racing history in a manner that gives a very complete history of the individual cars, their constructors and the series overall.

You get a visual taste of what’s inside before you even start to read. The slip case is wrapped with a large photo of Denny Hulme’s McLaren M8F, while the book’s jacket cover has a cropped photo of the unequal length and canted velocity stacks of the McLaren M20′s 565 cubic inch (9.26L) Chevy V8 (I told you they were big blocks). Framed by the car’s back wing (one of Can-Am’s many innovations), the brushed aluminum stacks look like sculpture. Inside the book on the page facing the table of contents is a full page photo of the all aluminum Holman-Moody Ford V8 from the Ford 429′er, one of the lesser known cars covered in the book. Based, somehow, on the cast iron production 429, this engine actually displaced 494CI. I hate to be trite and keep using words like stunning and arresting, but Harholdt’s photographs are top shelf car porn. The photographs appear to have been studio shot and the book could not have been possible without the cooperation of the owners of some irreplaceable cars.

The book is arranged chronologically, starting with 1966′s Chaparral 2E and ending with the Shadow DN4 that raced in the half-finished 1974 season. Thanks to owners’ foresight, vintage racing and the recognized value of vintage race cars to collectors’, a representative example of the racing hardware used in the Can-Am series still exists today, making the authors’ task a bit easier. Jim Hall’s race shop restored examples of all of his Chaparrals, which are represented in CACID by the 2E, (of which you can buy Hall-built exact replicas), the radical slipstream 2H, and the vacuum downforce and ultimately banned 2J. The Chaparrals were so innovative that some of their best known advancements contain fascinating subdetails. The 2E is usually noted for introducing high mounted wings to racing cars. Many also know that the 2E’s wing was under driver control, with high downforce in corners and trimmed for low drag on the straights. Driver control with a foot pedal was possible because the Chaparrals had torque converters, not clutches. A detail that is not as well known is the fact that the 2E’s wing struts were not mounted on the body, but rather to the wheel hubs, so the wing didn’t affect spring loading, it applied downforce directly to the tires. Wheel manufacturers and car companies alike imitated the 2E’s cast spoke wheel design. Hall has joked that if he’d bothered to copyright the design, he’d have made more money in royalties from BBS alone than he made racing cars.

Hall’s white cars were innovative, yet weren’t terribly successful in Can-Am, and he constantly butted heads with scrutineers as the series became increasingly concerned with rules. Bruce McLaren’s orange cars were more conventional (though just as beautiful), and they dominated the series, winning many races, often finishing 1-2 with McLaren and Hulme trading podium spots back and forth, and multiple championships. The book includes the M6A, and M8B McLarens in addition to the aforementioned M8F, and M20.

The relatively loose rules in Can-Am meant competitors were always looking for out of the box ideas for more speed. Based on the idea that minimal frontal area and a low profile meant maximum straightline speed, the AVS Shadow Mk 1, from 1969-70, used so-called “tiny tires”, about 30% less tall than other tires then used in Can-Am. The Shadow probably influenced the Tyrell six-wheeler raced later in F1.

There are three of Eric Broadley’s Lolas including the definition-of-automotive-beauty T70, and Ferrari is represented by the 612P, in unrestored condition as Chris Amon last raced it in 1971.

Porsche is represented by three iterations of the 917, the 917PA, the 917/10K, and the uber Porsche, the Mark Donohue / Roger Penske 917/30. The 917/30, at 1,100 horsepower, is acknowledged to be the most powerful closed course race car ever. Chew on that for a second. In almost 40 years, a more powerful race car, at least not one that had to turn right or left, has not been made. There has simply been nothing like the 917/30, then or now. Donohue was closely involved in the development of the car. The 917/30 had a driver controlled waste gate on the turbos that would give him about 1500 HP on demand and a driver adjustable rear sway bar that gave oversteer on demand. Donohue called it the “perfect race car”, and a “monument” to his career, already much accomplished.

To say that the 917/30 dominated Can-Am in 1973 is to state the obvious. Called by some “the car that killed Can-Am”, the 917/30 was so unlimited that it made a mockery not just of the car’s competition but of the concept of competition itself. More dominant than Ferrari in Schumacher’s time. Eight races, eight poles, six victories, one championship. The particular 917/30 in CACID was built for Donohue to use in the 1974 season and is finished in the Penske team’s blue and yellow Sunoco livery. He never drove this car, though. After winning the Can-Am championship in 1973 with the 917/30 and a remarkable 38% of the races that he entered in his career, Donohue retired from driving (he later came back to race in F1 for Penske, a decision that was ultimately and sadly fatal).

This 917/30 was formerly owned by the Porsche factory museum. Current owner Matt Drendel thinks he’s the luckiest man in the world. “What’s it like to drive? I get asked that a lot. It’s like a LearJet on takeoff. It feels like it’s never running out of power, and it feels like that in every gear. It feels like you’re being pushed by the hand of God. One time I floored it in second gear and the front wheels came off the ground!” The 917/30 is not an economy car but Drendel makes it sound like spending $1,000 on racing fuel for 90 minutes on the track with the 917/30 is more cost effective in terms of mental health than a year’s worth of 50 minute sessions with a shrink.

Can-Am wasn’t just about the cars. The drivers were among the greatest ever. The starting grid of just abut any race in the series’ history reads like a motorsports hall of fame roster. Represented in the book along with Hall (he’d previously won a US road racing championship) and McLaren, are Denny Hulme, Dan Gurney, Phil Hill, John Surtees, Mario Andretti (who drove a couple of the cars in the book, including a Honker owned by Paul Newman), Sam Posey (he still owns the Caldwell D7 he raced in Can-Am), Chris Amon, Vic Elford, George Follmer, Pedro Rodriguez, David Hobbs, Jody Scheckter, Brian Redman and of course the aforementioned Mark Donohue. Again, the stuff of legends.

At $100, Can-Am Cars In Detail is not cheap but it’s exceptionally well written, with first rate photography and the book is a good value if you’re at all interested in auto racing history. It seems that most contemporary racing series are infected with ennui or malaise. Formula One, NASCAR, IndyCar, all are targets of substantial and substantive criticism. Bernie Ecclestone, Brian France and Randy Bernard can all easily afford to spend a hundred bucks. If they want to get an idea what an exciting racing series looked like, and more importantly felt like, they could do much worse than pop for a copy of Lyons and Harholdt’s book.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

19 Comments on “Book Review: Can-Am Cars In Detail...”


  • avatar
    MikeAR

    The mid-60s through the mid-70s were the greatest years for racing, Guys like Gurney, Posey, Donohue, Revson and many others were some of the greatest of all time. It’s a shame racing isn’t like that now.

  • avatar
    Spitfire

    This looks like a must own even at the steep entry fee.
    as for the most powerful closed course road cars, I believe that in the final years of 1.5 liter turbo F1s 1,300 hp was exceeded many times
    “The most powerful of the turbo-era F1 engines was BMW’s in-line four
    which saw over 1100bhp in race trim at 5.0 bar boost in 1985 and ’86.
    In his book `The 1000bhp Grand Prix Cars,” Ian Bamsey writes that
    `Through ’85 BMW’s boost kept on climbing, to exceed 5.0 bar: power
    went to 1100bhp – and beyond. It had become impossible to measure:
    the BMW dyno went no higher.’ Also, `At Monza in 1986 Berger saw a
    5.5 bar flash reading from his BMW/Mader-Benetton … estimated over
    1300bhp.’

  • avatar
    PeriSoft

    If everything is an iconic legend, nothing is.
     
    That, my friend, is a very unique thing to say.

  • avatar
    V572625694

    Jim Hall was an amazing constructor/driver. If some people have to make great fortunes in the oil business, I’m glad there are a few like him who use the wealth to provide entertainment and delight. I’ll always remember a picture in Road & Track of a Chaparral at the Nürburgring with a Texas license plate on the back panel. And the 2J “sucker car” was a huge game-changer, or would have been, had not the argument against it–that it might crash into other cars if the snowmobile engines that provided the vacuum failed–prevailed. Of course there are are parts on every car that can cause a crash by failing.

  • avatar
    twotone

    I have fond memories of the Porsche 917 Group 30 cars back in their race day. The greatest race car every built or ever to be built. They did for CAN-AM what Audi did for Group B — too good for the course.

    Twotone

  • avatar
    gslippy

    Nice writeup, RS.

    A few nice videos on the Porsche 917/30:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYBtCJDQqqg Note the appalling guard rails and proximity of the crowd.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C02jDvfBHU&NR=1  Hear every part of them move.

    If you love engines, you must watch these:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tU0r99fyD0U&feature=related  An excellent piece that doesn’t even include racing (part 1 of engine resurrection after 30 years).
    Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xk4DxZZc9So&feature=related

  • avatar
    porschespeed

    Ronnie,

    A great piece on a great series that, were it still extant, would make the world a (slightly) better place.

    Oh well, time marches on – usually on the throat of the good and the right, but I digress…

    Justa couple of nitpicks, one of which is open to some debate. My Porsche sources always told me the 917 was capable of about 1500 HP if you cranked the boost right to the ragged edge for qualifying -which was impressive back in the day. Agreed that average during the race was about 1100 HP, as it matches the weight/aero/Mulsanne calculations…

    As to the HP/L being the highest ever for a road course car, may I prod you to recall the halcyon days of turbocharged F1? C’mon man,I know you’re old enough…

    1500 HP from 1500CC.

    The 917-30 in the final ’74-’75 max iteration was 5374 CC – and (only!) generated about 2000HP flash max right before melting…

    But still,a great read. If only the kids still saw racing like CAN-AM, the world would be a better place.

  • avatar

    Thanks for the kind words.
    Can-Am wasn’t a perfect series. It did, after all, die in the middle of the 1974 season.
    I don’t think it’s possible today to have a truly unlimited formula. At the least there’d be some kind of rules concerning safety – as glorious as racing was in the ’60s and ’70s, a lot of great drivers, including Donohue, got killed. I do like Pete DeLorenzo’s idea about setting a maximum amount of fuel/energy that can be used in a race and then leave it up to the engineers and designers.
     
    I have my own idea about a racing series that I think would be popular. The cars would be production based like the German and Australian touring car series and the formula would be open enough to allow participation by just about all car companies selling cars in North America. North America is also a key. Races will be in the US, Canada and Mexico. Tracks will include ovals, road courses, dirt tracks and quarter mile dragstrips – all with the same cars and drivers. Maybe even toss in a stadium based rally car setup like they have in the X Games. Minor alterations will be allowed for the different tracks – tires, shocks, springs, wings. No two consecutive weekends will be at the same kind of track. Ideally the last race of the season would be on the road course at either Indy or Daytona. Both of those courses incorporate road sections with the main ovals. I doubt that the Frances would get on board and it’s possible that the Hulman-George family would like to have an event around Labor Day to go with the Memorial Day and July open wheel and NASCAR races. Having races in Mexico lets you start the series relatively early in the year – maybe the 3rd weekend in January. That’s before NASCAR starts racing, before the Super Bowl, and after all the collegiate football bowl games.
    Award championships for individual disciplines and overall series champ.
    I think this would have great fan appeal. The idea is to appeal to a broad variety of motorsports fans.
     
    I’m not yet sure how to do it, but the financial setup would be more like the stick and ball sports than how motorsports is now set up. In the stick and ball sports the team owners own a franchise, a piece of the league, and the owners have  a say in how the league operates. Right now the racing team owners are at the mercy of the series organizers.
     
    The final piece of the puzzle would be the drivers. For drivers, I’d follow the model used by the upstart American Football League back when they took on the NFL. Go after the young talent. Identify the best 16-18 year old kart, Legends, 1/8 Mile drag, etc. racers and sign them up before Ganassi, Penske, Roush et al do. Give them (or their parents) a piece of the action – perhaps stock in the league.
     
    Because of the variety of tracks, scheduling shouldn’t be a problem – most major racetracks schedule only a handful of events every year.

    • 0 avatar
      th009

      @Ronnie, DTM is not production-based: custom space frame, production silhoutte, purpose-built V8 racing engine.  The Australian V8 supercars are closer, but even they don’t use standard production bodyshells.
       
      BTCC, WTCC and SCCA World Challenge would be more reasonable starting points in that regard, although the cars in those series are far smaller than the V8s you refer to.

    • 0 avatar
      porschespeed

      Ronnie,
       
      Myself (and anyone else with a discriminating brain) will always offer praise for a job well done.
       
      Though in many ways we may be polar opposites, we share a good deal when it comes to what this site (should be) about: cars.
       
      I like your idea for a series,and frankly I’d love to see the world of racing limits actually be defined by a few simple limits per category. Limit the displacement/weight, or the overall fuel consumption, or  BSFC. Whatever.
       
      While I know that there would be an increased level of fatalities, I also know that new and novel tech would emerge.
       
      If only the world at large would trade the risk of death for a 300 MPH  race, NAPCAR   wouldn’t be so boring.

    • 0 avatar
      Revver

      “Can-Am wasn’t a perfect series. It did, after all, die in the middle of the 1974 season.”
       
      Ronnie, nice piece on the book. The Can Am is correctly remembered as producing some of the most innovative and awesome racing machines. That is of course the focus of the book.
      The quote I took from you is a reminder that the series is also frequently (mis)remembered as a “golden age” of racing. It was in fact, pretty poor racing. I followed the series closely through Automotive Week & Competition Press, and you’ll find the majority of letters to the paper about the series, from both casual and hardcore fans, were outright negative about the lousy racing.
      Certainly the ingredients were all there as you said: the cars, the drivers, (pardon me if I must mention a few more: Oliver, Siffert, Stewart, Cevert, Gethin, Scarfiotti, Brabham, Hunt, Savage, Jarier, Pace, Haywood, and even the tracks: Mosport, Bridgehampton, Watkins Glen, Road America, Road Atlanta, Riverside. . .  The Can Am was a superb spectacle, but as a racing series, it left room for improvement.
      It’s frequently mentioned that the 917/30 and Penske killed the series, but this isn’t so. The series had been utterly dominated by McLaren for so long, that race attendence had fallen to money-losing levels for several of the tracks that hosted it long before the Panzer Porsche came to town.

  • avatar

    This review comes along at an interesting time. I was sent a copy of a Leon Mandel compilation to review, and the selected writings focus heavily on Can-Am. I haven’t followed racing in years, and never followed it closely. Now I feel myself getting sucked in…

    • 0 avatar
      william442

      Have you read Leon’s book, FAST LANE SUMMER ? It is mostly about Sullivan, but interesting anyway.
      Leon liked Peter Revson a lot also ,which puzzled me even though we were at Cornell together. (Revson)

  • avatar
    william442

    Some where I have a picture of Denny Hulme carrying a broken half-shaft back to the pits at Mid Ohio. The person next to me won a prize for the same picture.

  • avatar
    bunkie

    Thinking about Can-Am just makes me angry at how utterly awful the big racing series are these day.

    These men were giants. As a kid who grew up in the sixties and who followed racing (scratch-building slot cars mostly with McLaren-like bodies), this book has jumped to the top of my wish list. To this day, I idolize Jim Hall. His combination of outrageous innovation and American cheek epitomized an era when anything was possible.

    When a series goes the spec route, I completely lose interest. As important as drivers are, it’s the cars themselves that should, at least, share equal glory. Spec series remove that part of the equation and we’re often left with little more than soap opera for guys. Can-Am was, of course, doomed by it’s own outrageous nature. But for an all-too-brief period, it blazed across the firmament literally and figuratively. The cars and their designers and builders deserve our respect.

  • avatar
    V572625694

    How about (as I think I saw suggested here) a racing series with no technical specifications except a limit on the BTU content of the fuel consumed over the distance?

  • avatar
    bunkie

    The reasons series go spec are almost always to contain speed and cost. The BTU content solution won’t solve either of these problems.

  • avatar
    Jellodyne

    BTU content would certainly contain speed, assuming the limits are set low enough. It essentially puts a mileage cap on the cars. I doubt you’re going to get 1500 bhp cars running 200 mph if there’s a hard limit of lets say 10 mpg (or diesel equivalent — thus it’s a BTU cap rather than mileage cap, if you just said 10mpg all cars would be diesel because of the higher BTUs of the fuel). An advantage of the cap would be to get manufacturers to start thinking of ways to cheat friction, some of which may work its way into our road cars. The trick would be to set the BTU cap high enough to get speeds up, but low enough to keep things relatively safe.
    I’m not so sure it would limit costs as well as speeds, as you can do all sorts of expensive things to get better mileage, with carbon fiber and whatnot.
     

  • avatar

    I consider myself blessed that my father brought me to several Can-Am races when I was a wee lad. I saw many legends fly by me at speed with a thunder that will never be heard again on this planet.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India