By on October 5, 2010

The day after Toyota announced that it still hasn’t found an electronic cause for unintended acceleration in its vehicles and that UA complaints are down 80%, Consumer Affairs reports that Allstate Insurance filed a $3m suit against the Japanese automaker, claiming it “essentially hid the problem.” The suit, filed in the Southern Californian district court that is hearing all UA-related suits against Toyota alleges

This has resulted in numerous claims of instances of property damage and injuries, including in some instances fatalities

Furthermore, the suit claims that it had to compensate UA-related claims because Toyota hadn’t fitted a brake-override to its vehicles, a feature that is not yet required by law. Toyota is adding brake-override to all of its 2011 models, but claims that Allstate’s charges “have no basis.”

Still, CA reckons other insurance firms are “likely” to follow Allstate’s example and add to the pile of civil suits that is stacking up against Toyota (estimated at as much as $10b in liabilities). And Allstate’s Christina Loznicka tells Moneycontrol

We are expected to be one of several insurance companies that are taking this action

Meanwhile, Toyota’s latest response to UA debacle is to put more Americans in leadership positions in the US, including the lead design spots for new versions of the Venza, Tundra and Avalon.

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

8 Comments on “Allstate Sues Toyota Over Unintended Acceleration Claims, More Insurance Suits Likely...”


  • avatar
    John Horner

    Hmmm, so Toyota is saying that the implementation of floor mat and accelerator pedal fixes has led to an 80% reduction in UA reports for its vehicles. If true, that gives Allstate and others a pretty strong standing to claim that defective products are the root cause of much of this class of the insurance company’s losses visa-vis Toyota vehicles.
    Expect to see a lot of verbal fireworks, followed by an out of court settlement.
     

  • avatar
    daga

    Isn’t Allstate where Mark LaNeve, the old GM marketing and sales guy, went?  hmm…

  • avatar
    mcs

    To add to Toyota’s problems, apparently the 11 Camry only scores 3 stars on the new NHTSA tests. The Sonata managed 5 stars. Talk about a major reversal.
    http://money.cnn.com/2010/10/05/autos/new_nhtsa_crash_tests/index.htm

    • 0 avatar
      Robert.Walter

      Friend of mine was a D3 crash engineer. 

      Got a good job offer from Toyota in Ann Arbor, so he took it. 

      After he saw how they went about handling safety in their vehicles, “very primative, like the ole days, the test it, if it doesn’t pass, the upgrade it to reach the target…”, he went and begged for his old job back. 

      He is good, so he was welcomed back by his former employer.

  • avatar
    psarhjinian

    Furthermore, the suit claims that it had to compensate UA-related claims because Toyota hadn’t fitted a brake-override to its vehicles, a feature that is not yet required by law
     
    That would set an interesting precedent.  Are we going to see suits of other marques (Ford) who have SUA problems and don’t have brake-override?  Are we going to see suits for other companies who don’t supply all possible safety equipment (side/curtain airbags, ESC, BLIS, Pre-Safe, etc).
     
    Allstate is doing this because they have to.  If they don’t, their own stakeholders would sue them for failure to exercise due diligence.

  • avatar
    phantomwolf

    eh, as always, follow the money.


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributing Writers

  • Jack Baruth, United States
  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Vojta Dobes, Czech Republic
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Cameron Aubernon, United States
  • J Emerson, United States