What's Wrong With This Picture: The Very Model Of A Modern Mainstream Automobile Edition

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The Automotive X-Prize is over, and the Edison2 Team has won the “Mainstream” class with its Very Light Car. It may not look like any mainstream car you’ve seen recently, but it does fit four passengers, offers air-con, heater, an audio system, and a 200 mile range. And using a 250 cc ethanol engine, it got 102.5 MPGe, while accelerating to 60 MPH in 14.2 seconds. But this was not necessarily a hard-fought victory: Edison2 was the only team that even made it into the finals in the “Mainstream” class. Meanwhile, the X-Tracer motorcycle shown above won the “Alternative” class. In fact, it won the whole damn competition with 197 MPGe while accelerating to 60 MPH in just over 6 seconds. So, despite the ego-boosting rhetoric from Nancy Pelosi, and the other politicians speaking at the awards ceremony, the Automotive X-Prize didn’t so much advance America closer towards a fuel-efficient future as it proved that motorcycles are way more efficient than cars are. The much-maligned gas guzzlers that we know as “mainstream cars” are in little danger from this lot.



Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 19 comments
  • Djoelt1 Djoelt1 on Sep 16, 2010

    I think the better way to look at these cars is, when gasoline is $20 per gallon we can still drive a private car. If you march down to your local car dealer and the only thing they have on the lot is cars like this, are you going to skip car ownership and ride the bus? Didn't think so. The bigger question is, if people would drive this rather than take the bus, why not do it now and prevent gas from ever reaching $20 per gallon?

    • Psarhjinian Psarhjinian on Sep 16, 2010
      The bigger question is, if people would drive this rather than take the bus, why not do it now and prevent gas from ever reaching $20 per gallon? Because that's COMMUNISM!
  • Facebook User Facebook User on Sep 17, 2010

    Motorcycles already CAN get ~ 100mpg+ regularly. Google for KLR650 diesel. If only they'd be mass produced...The military (supposedly) buys a lot of these. For those of you unfamiliar with the KLR650 it's (in gas form) a 35hp or so bike that can do 90mph witout much trouble. Even stock rebel 250's can get 85'ish and creep up to 70mph or so. If you commute on this for 6k miles/year, the difference between this $2k used 85mpg bike and one that gets 200mpg is not much. 6000/85=70.5 6000/200=30 at $20 gallon, the difference is $800/year. For that $800 you get (probably) cheaper parts, a proven design (20 years+?) a probably more comfortable riding position and a dealer network that exists everywhere. Add in cost of tires (special for this "e" motorcycle?) parts (also special?) original cost (??), insurance, etc and it would take forever to make up the difference. I'd gamble that the rebel is cheaper & a better buy on pretty much all front's.

  • SaulTigh Unless we start building nuclear plants and beefing up the grid, this drive to electrification (and not just cars) will be the destruction of modern society. I hope you love rolling blackouts like the US was some third world failed state. You don't support 8 billion people on this planet without abundant and relatively cheap energy.So no, I don't want an electric car, even if it's cheap.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Lou_BCone of many cars I sold when I got commissioned into the army. 1964 Dodge D100 with slant six and 3 on the tree, 1973 Plymouth Duster with slant six, 1974 dodge dart custom with a 318. 1990 Bronco 5.0 which was our snowboard rig for Wa state and Whistler/Blackcomb BC. Now :my trail rigs are a 1985 Toyota FJ60 Land cruiser and 86 Suzuki Samurai.
  • RHD They are going to crash and burn like Country Garden and Evergrande (the Chinese property behemoths) if they don't fix their problems post-haste.
  • Golden2husky The biggest hurdle for us would be the lack of a good charging network for road tripping as we are at the point in our lives that we will be traveling quite a bit. I'd rather pay more for longer range so the cheaper models would probably not make the cut. Improve the charging infrastructure and I'm certainly going to give one a try. This is more important that a lowish entry price IMHO.
  • Add Lightness I have nothing against paying more to get quality (think Toyota vs Chryco) but hate all the silly, non-mandated 'stuff' that automakers load onto cars based on what non-gearhead focus groups tell them they need to have in a car. I blame focus groups for automatic everything and double drivetrains (AWD) that really never gets used 98% of the time. The other 2% of the time, one goes looking for a place to need it to rationanalize the purchase.
Next