GM Core Brands Drop 10.6 Percent In August

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Sales of GMs core brands dropped 10.6 percent in August compared to their Cash-For-Clunkers-fueled August 2009 performance, but overall sales were down 25 percent. Because the C4C program helped The General shift more value-oriented models, Buick was up 66 percent, Cadillac was up 83 percent, and GMC was up 12.3 percent, while Chevrolet shed 21.5 percent.

Top improving nameplates include Buick LaCrosse (+89.6%, 5,339 units), Cadillac SRX (+208.7%, 4,325), Cadillac CTS (+60.8%, 4,155), Cadillac DTS (+1278%, 1,896) and GMC Terrain (+787.5%, 4,189).GM’s biggest decliners by nameplate were Chevy Aveo (-68.4%, 4,019) Chevy Cobalt (-67.6%, 5,643), Chevy Traverse (-31.5%, 7,850), and GMC Acadia (-23.2%, 4,223). Big trucks held steady, with Silverado gaining 5 percent to 34,084 and Sierra declining .1 percent to 11,640, but compact pickups like GMC Canyon (-61.5%, 667 units) and Chevy Colorado (-60.3%, 1,847 units) dropped hard. Big utes were as did better than their big pickup brethren, with Tahoe rising about 2 percent to 6,119 units, Suburban dropping 25% to 3,080, Yukon rising 84.6% to 2,387 and Yukon XL increasing 82.4% to 1,556. Escalades were up about 15 percent as a group.

Meanwhile, fleet sales continue to make up a significant number of GM’s sales, with 51,951 units going to fleets, or about 28 percent of GM’s August 2010 sales. Based on GM’s announcement of Buick, Cadillac and GMC retail improvements (+102%, +83%, +18% respectively), and improvement in Chevy full-size truck retail numbers (+8%), most of that fleet volume was composed of Chevy cars.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
  • 1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
  • Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
  • MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)
Next