Report: Auto Industry Still Carrying 3.5m Units Of Overcapacity

by Edward Niedermeyer

Published: August 27th, 2010

report auto industry still carrying 3 5m units of overcapacity

Edmund’ Bill Visnic takes on the latest Harbour report, which finds North American auto plants running at an average of 58 percent capacity (even Europe, the global whipping boy for intractable auto overcapacity operates at an average 81 percent). Despite the recent downsizings across North America, the Harbour Report still estimates that 3.5m units of annual overcapacity remains in the US and Canadian auto manufacturing footprint, equivalent to 14 unneeded assembly plants. A rise in sales levels to the previous 15-16m mark could help the situation according to the report, but increased plant flexibility will be the factor that automakers can actually control. Even so, if 15-16m annual units don’t come soon, North America could be looking at more plant closures and job losses.

#Jobs #Overcapacity #Production #Sales #Suppliers

Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 18 comments

Arete on Aug 28, 2010

It appears from the graphic that the 3.5 million number and the 58% refer to the northern states and Canada only. If one adds in southern US and Mexico, the overcapacity probably goes up (as even Toyota/Nissan/Honda have some overcapacity), while the percentage utilization is probably better and drags the average up. Also, one other thing to consider. The 15M capacity in North America isn't equivalent to sales in NA, since a percentage of vehicles are imported from abroad (almost all German, large portion Korean and some Japanese as well). That means that the 15M domestic capacity is probably enough to serve maybe 19-20M domestic sales. The high for the US was about 16.5M if memory serves, and Mexico / Canada are probably a million each, so even a recovery to the highs of 2007 won't get rid of undercapacity.

Like Reply
RogerB34 on Aug 28, 2010

Nice article. The media doesn't care about a problem that has been around since Y2K.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Jeff Self driving cars are not ready for prime time.
Lichtronamo Watch as the non-us based automakers shift more production to Mexico in the future.
28-Cars-Later " Electrek recently dug around in Tesla’s online parts catalog and found that the windshield costs a whopping $1,900 to replace.To be fair, that’s around what a Mercedes S-Class or Rivian windshield costs, but the Tesla’s glass is unique because of its shape. It’s also worth noting that most insurance plans have glass replacement options that can make the repair a low- or zero-cost issue. "Now I understand why my insurance is so high despite no claims for years and about 7,500 annual miles between three cars.
AMcA My theory is that that when the Big 3 gave away the store to the UAW in the last contract, there was a side deal in which the UAW promised to go after the non-organized transplant plants. Even the UAW understands that if the wage differential gets too high it's gonna kill the golden goose.
MKizzy Why else does range matter? Because in the EV advocate's dream scenario of a post-ICE future, the average multi-car household will find itself with more EVs in their garages and driveways than places to plug them in or the capacity to charge then all at once without significant electrical upgrades. Unless each vehicle has enough range to allow for multiple days without plugging in, fighting over charging access in multi-EV households will be right up there with finances for causes of domestic strife.