BREAKING: Ed Whitacre To Step Down As GM Chairman/CEO

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

GM Chairman/CEO Ed Whitacre just announced during GM’s Q2 financial conference call that he will step down as CEO on September 1, and as Chairman at the end of 2010. GM board member Dan Akerson will take over both of Whitacre’s position. Whitacre called Akerson “very involved” and said he expects a smooth transition. Whitacre planned to leave after “returning GM to greatness,” and says that “with a good foundation in place,” he’s ready to leave. The board’s been aware of Whitacre’s plan, and the board was ready to act when Whitacre said he was ready to step down. Akerson says he and Whitacre “share a vision” for GM, so instead of setting an agenda now, he’s focusing on a smooth transition. Akerson noted that Whitacre “had made some management changes” already, and he’s confident in his “deep bench.” The major transition, he says, “is me,” because he needs to gain a day-to-day, operational perspective on the business.

All told, Akerson, who was Head of Global Buyout for the Carlyle Group before joining GM’s board in July of last year, seems to not have a clear agenda developed for his leadership of GM. Whitacre, it seems, was but the hatchet man, and having shaken up management, Akerson seems content to keep GM rolling along the path that Whitacre has laid out. Like Whitacre, he does not have industry experience, and a transition period in which he becomes familiar with day-to-day GM operations seems inevitable. Whether he eventually takes GM in a new direction won’t likely be clear until he has at least assumed the CEO job, as he notes that “Ed is still in charge right now.”

Whitacre emphasized that GM’s board knew that he didn’t plan on staying, and yet no effort appears to have been made to find a CEO from outside the organization. Why Akerson was selected was not clear, other than that he allowed the board to make an easy decision and a smooth transition. Overall, the perception seems to be that GM is profitable and under control, and that settling into cruise control makes perfect sense at this point. With GM making money in a weak market environment, and with 30-40 percent more production capacity available without a strong ramp-up in fixed costs, there’s a certain case for this perspective. On the other hand, Opel and Daewoo are still in deep trouble, unfunded pensions loom, and GM’s North American fleet sales are clearly being boosted by incentives and daily rental fleet sales. Akerson is going to have to show something other than a caretaker’s perspective if GM’s turnaround is going to overcome these obstacles.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 82 comments
  • Blowfish Blowfish on Aug 13, 2010

    Wonder if he had missed the German imports?

  • BklynPete BklynPete on Aug 13, 2010

    I agree with Buickman that Whitacre deserves credit for instilling accountability and making tremendous strides in this country's 2nd most impossible bureaucracy (I'd rank the Federal Govt. as #1). I don't like the mindless GM-bashing that goes on here, but the skeptic in me is suspicious of the announcement's timing. Sure, I can accept that Big Eddie never intended to stay all that long. But 14 months? C'mon! I'm getting the same queasy feeling as seeing Bush in a jumpsuit declaring "mission accomplished," followed by High Fives and chest-thumping. Seriously, if Big Eddie really wanted to get the job done, why not go through the IPO, the Cruze and Volt launches, getting Europe sorted out, and the finding of a genuinely suitable long-term successor? The guy's rich and retired, and he's not in any rush to go elsewhere. If things are so hunky-dory at RenCen, who cares if he commutes from Texas for another year? I fear the 3rd and 4th quarter earnings will show some ugliness that Whitacre's looking to distant himself from. I really, REALLY hope I'm wrong, but Daanii2's liposuction comment may prove to be a fair one.

  • Lorenzo Yes, they can recover from the Ghosn-led corporate types who cheapened vehicles in the worst ways, including quality control. In the early to mid-1990s Nissan had efficient engines, and reliable drivetrains in well-assembled, fairly durable vehicles. They can do it again, but the Japanese government will have to help Nissan extricate itself from the "Alliance". It's too bad Japan didn't have a George Washington to warn about entangling alliances!
  • Slavuta Nissan + profitability = cheap crap
  • ToolGuy Why would they change the grille?
  • Oberkanone Nissan proved it can skillfully put new frosting on an old cake with Frontier and Z. Yet, Nissan dealers are so broken they are not good at selling the Frontier. Z production is so minimal I've yet to see one. Could Nissan boost sales? Sure. I've heard Nissan plans to regain share at the low end of the market. Kicks, Versa and lower priced trims of their mainstream SUV's. I just don't see dealerships being motivated to support this effort. Nissan is just about as exciting and compelling as a CVT.
  • ToolGuy Anyone who knows, is this the (preliminary) work of the Ford Skunk Works?
Next