BMW's (Ob)noxious Ad Shot Down

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

The RAC (that’s the Royal version of the AAA, in case you don’t know) reports that BMW has run into trouble with the UK Advertising Standards Agency (ASA, that’s no film speed in the UK) with one of their adverts. In it, BMW claimed that its Z4 roadster had low levels of CO2 (you know CO2? That obnoxious gas which every government in the world is trying to reduce/tax?). The advert reads “Joy makes the most of every drop…So you can step on the accelerator, knowing Joy will minimise the CO2 emissions.” The advert ends with “BMW EfficientDynamics, Less emissions, More driving pleasure.” This riled two people enough to complain to the ASA. Now what could have been so contentious…?

Well, the answer to that question lies in the small print of the advert. In it, BMW states quite clearly that the car in question (a BMW Z4 sDrive 35is Roadster) emits 210g/km. Now to give this some context, 210g/km is band K in the UK car tax system (did I mention tax?), only 2 below the highest tax band. Hardly a Toyota Prius. Well, it seems BMW had a different interpretation of the advert. They argued that they were comparing the Z4 against the previous generation Z4. They also argued that the Z4 had the lowest emissions of any of its competitors’ comparable models. The ASA came down in favour of the complainers, citing that readers were likely to assume that BMW’s claims were a comparison against all cars and not just cars in its class. “Because an emission rate of 210 g/km was relatively high for any car, despite being lower than BMW’s previous model and some competitors’ similar specification vehicles, we concluded that the ad was likely to mislead without further qualification.” ASA said. It does make me wonder, though. Who’s looking at an advert for a sportscar and thinking “Wow! I’m killing the planet with my Insight! I’ve gotta get me that 3 litre, 6 cylinder roadster!”.

Wasn’t that one also banned? Picture courtesy hypebeast.com

Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Psarhjinian Psarhjinian on Jul 22, 2010

    I love that they have laws against misleading advertising. That's like laws against fish breathing water.

  • Ott Ott on Jul 22, 2010

    It's easier to beg for forgiveness than to ask for permission.

  • Arthur Dailey The longest we have ever kept a car was 13 years for a Kia Rondo. Only ever had to perform routine 'wear and tear' maintenance. Brake jobs, tire replacements, fluids replacements (per mfg specs), battery replacement, etc. All in all it was an entirely positive ownership experience. The worst ownership experiences from oldest to newest were Ford, Chrysler and Hyundai.Neutral regarding GM, Honda, Nissan (two good, one not so good) and VW (3 good and 1 terrible). Experiences with other manufacturers were all too short to objectively comment on.
  • MaintenanceCosts Two-speed transfer case and lockable differentials are essential for getting over the curb in Beverly Hills to park on the sidewalk.
  • MaintenanceCosts I don't think any other OEM is dumb enough to market the system as "Full Self-Driving," and if it's presented as a competitor to SuperCruise or the like it's OK.
  • Oberkanone Tesla license their skateboard platforms to other manufacturers. Great. Better yet, Tesla manufacture and sell the platforms and auto manufacturers manufacture the body and interiors. Fantastic.
  • ToolGuy As of right now, Tesla is convinced that their old approach to FSD doesn't work, and that their new approach to FSD will work. I ain't saying I agree or disagree, just telling you where they are.
Next