By on June 29, 2010

The NRA, the Pope, Porsche and Piech, all eyes were on the Supreme Court for the last few days: Gun owners watched the Chicago case (right to arm bears upheld.) Accountants and CPAs monitored the treatment of their favorite boondoggle, a.k.a. Sarbanes-Oxley (upheld.) Rome said “oh my God” when they heard that a lawsuit that accuses the Vatican of conspiring with U.S. church officials to cover up sex abuse could proceed. Meanwhile, Germany’s attention, from Zuffenhausen to Wolfsburg, was fixated on Morrison v. National Australia Bank, No. 08-1191.  The Supreme Court seriously frustrated attemps by overseas investors who want to drag non-American companies into American courts. Champagne corks popped at Volkswagen and Porsche. The Guardian: “America’s supreme court has told prospective European claimants to take their claims back to Europe.” So what does that have to do with Porsche?

For all practical intents and purposes, the Anschluss of Porsche with Volkswagen has already been consummated. Volkswagen is putting its boys into Porsche. Piech is already leaking his supposedly most secret product plans. Volkswagen is moving at light speed with people and products, but they are dragging their heels when it comes to finishing the “Integrierter Automobilkonzern” – the final, formal, official subjugation of Porsche. Maybe next year. Maybe later. And why’s that?

Damn lawyers. A group of hedge funds brought suit against Porsche. If they win, it could cost Porsche up to €9b. According to a prospectus for a money raise by Volkswagen, a win in U.S. courts “could even lead to the insolvency of Porsche Automobil Holding SE.” You don’t want to own something that might be liable for more than 10 billion dollars.

With the Supreme Court decision that reversed 40 year old case law, the plaintiffs “will have a much harder time to pursue their case in the U.S.A.,” says Das Manager Managzin. The case of  Hedgies v. Porsche rests on the same paragraphs and case law that was just annihilated by the High Court.

Says the magazine: “The plaintiffs could now base their case on state law instead of federal law. If that doesn’t work out, they would have to bring their case to a German court. The legal hurdles are much higher in Germany than in the U.S.A.” Not only that. The awards are much, much lower in Germany. Bringing a civil suit is risky in Germany: Loser pays all court and legal costs. The higher the damages claimed, the higher the costs. Let’s put it this way: You don’t want to sue Porsche in Stuttgart unless you have a watertight case. And even then, the judge will most likely wag his finger at you and recommend that you settle.

Manager Magazin’s bottom line: “Piech & Co breathe a sigh of relief.” The U.S. Supreme Court did its share for the advancement of an “Integrierter Automobilkonzern.”

Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

Recommended

3 Comments on “Supreme Court Delights Piech And Porsche...”



Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Recent Comments

  • Re: Company Whistleblower Behind Latest Recall of 240,000 Hyundai, Kia Vehicles

    PenguinBoy - @S197GT- 1) A poorly designed gas pedal that’s prone to getting trapped under floor mats is a defect. 2)...
  • Re: QOTD: What to Do With Mazda?

    gtemnykh - Maybe go after a piece of the lucrative pick-up pie and bring over a BT50 (or rebadge someone else’s truck?) Bring in some Toyota-ness and utility and expand...
  • Re: It’s Time For the Tide to Turn on Automaker Junkets

    Mark Stevenson - I’d love to know how you can simultaneously test if rear-seat entertainment induces motion sickness while you’re...
  • Re: QOTD: What to Do With Mazda?

    zoomzoomfan - They are addressing the NVH, thankfully. The CX-5 and new CX-9 have been praised in road tests for their quietness. I’d say put the CX-9’s turbo 2.5...
  • Re: QOTD: What to Do With Mazda?

    bullnuke - Tim Cain probably has better figures than I but from what I researched Mazda sold 1,202,489 units world-wide in 2016. They managed to move around 289,000 in the US...
  • Re: QOTD: What to Do With Mazda?

    chiefmonkey - I think Mazda’s “Driving Matters” ads are way better than Honda’s “Point of View” and “Walking on a Dream”...
  • Re: QOTD: What to Do With Mazda?

    Syke - 1. Dealer numbers. Like you said, if you don’t have a dealer in a town, you don’t sell cars in that town. Add to that some severe restrictions on what the...
  • Re: QOTD: What to Do With Mazda?

    kkop - Waaayyy back, my wife then girlfriend owned an MX-6. Unpretentious, but fun car. Currently, it’s more of the reverse. My last interaction with a Mazda product was...
  • Re: QOTD: What to Do With Mazda?

    e30gator - Mazda is looking in the wrong direction. They’re barely a blip on the radar of most premium shoppers and the millionaire next door types are going to keep...
  • Re: Nothing Odd About This Sky-high Inventory Buildup, GM Claims

    deanst - If they need 20% off sales to keep inventories at these elevated levels, I guess 30% off is around the corner. A $20,000 Malibu hybrid...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Contributors

  • Matthew Guy, Canada
  • Seth Parks, United States
  • Ronnie Schreiber, United States
  • Bozi Tatarevic, United States
  • Chris Tonn, United States
  • Corey Lewis, United States
  • Moderators

  • Adam Tonge, United States
  • Kyree Williams, United States