Jaguars. Soon Made in China

by Cammy Corrigan

Published: June 1st, 2010

Over the next few years, life in the UK is going to be pretty – austere. The Centre-Right government has been in power barely a month, and already they’ve slashed the budget by £6.2 billion. That was just the scalpel, wait till the axe comes. So, with a possible second recession in the offing, it’s time for some good news. And here it is…

The BBC reports that Tata-owned Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) is going to start assembling their vehicles in China. “We will need to manufacture at least 2 models in China,” said Carl-Peter Forster, JLR’s Chief Executive. “We’ll take 1 to 2 years to set it up, first we’ll need a partner.” That’s right, JLR isn’t above Chinese law, and they have to look for a Chinese joint venture partner. Then, the joint venture needs to be approved by the government. (Not that they usually are against it.)

Why China? Jags and Land Rovers are moving. Much of the growth came from China, where Jaguar sales rose 38 percent and Land Rover sales rose 55 percent during the year. India is also strong.

Mr Forster was quick to quell any fears that going to China might take any work from the UK based factories. Despite the growth in China and India, Forster said that either countries would “never be the centre for Jaguar Land Rover, it will remain in the UK. Most of the volume growth in these markets will benefit the UK operations”. Aha. By the way, JLR will produce Land Rovers in India next year.

At the same time, Forster is pushing for the closure of one of the factories in the UK, in the name of the almighty efficiency: “We are talking about having one efficient operation rather than 2 inefficient operations said Mr Forster, “We are not necessarily talking about getting rid of people.” Not necessarily?

An extra 1,000 jobs will be created in the UK – temporary jobs. Forster had an answer for that, too: “It takes a year or two before the jobs become permanent,”. With last financial year sales for JLR at 193,982 and with JLR expecting to top 200,000, the future looks rosy for JLR in Carl-Peter Forster’s eyes.

Forster has more ambitious plans. He wants to defy Newton. “The centre of gravity for the European auto industry is on the Continent and we have to pull the centre of gravity towards the UK.”

Start pulling, Pete! Anything that boosts exports and secures jobs for the UK is good in my eyes. With the upcoming budget cuts the UK faces, any foreign money is welcome. Even if Mao’s head is on it.

#CammyCorrigan #China #India #Jaguar #JLR #UK

Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 13 comments

Tstag on Jun 01, 2010

Wait you ripped a lot of this out of a BBC article? Oh dear.... They aren't exactly known for being on the ball. Autocar and Autoblog have some good coverage on this. They managed to find out that JLR have at least 4 new models coming and that's before we even count Project Icon (the Defender replacement). To be fair about the TTAC article, it's more the tone of it I disagree with than anything else. Why not mention the list of new models JLR will be building and the 1 billion dollars a year TATA have said they will inject into JLR's operations to build new models. Someone reading this might take a lot of negative vibes away, but the truth is the future for JLR is looking more rosey now than it ever has. That deserves a mention. As does the fact that JLR quickly returned to profit, with very little in the way of government handouts. Why didn't TTAC mention the four or five new models? Bet you won't answer that....

Like Reply
- Cammy Corrigan on Jun 01, 2010
  
  I didn't mention the four or five models because it wasn't really relevant. The fact is, JLR are growing and I'm pleased. Both for the UK and JLR. If you read TTAC, you'll known I'm a huge JLR fan (my avatar is a clue). However, healthy scepticism is a need for working at TTAC. Remember, CEO and chief executives always like to spin things. Also, for the record, Tata were angling for government loans. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7789055.stm
  
  Like
Amit Das on Jun 02, 2010

The news just keeps getting better... or worse, depending on which continent you live in. Mr. Ratan Tata is a silent raider, he is doing a Daimler-Chrysler without the German arrogance. Unfortunately for the British, JLR is on its way to being an Asian carmarker. Tsk, tsk... hopefully Mr. Tata didn't take his grandfather's view of the British Empire to heart... "Jaguar-Land Rover to soon run on Tata Motors engineering" The move to marry engine operations is the brainchild of the new leadership team at Tata Motors under Carl-Peter Forster, which has been vocal about the increased importance of India and China in the future of JLR. A Tata Motors spokesman confirmed the move to jointly develop engines. “As India is a preferred source of production, we’ll source the engines here with the design left for the JLR team,” he said. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/auto/automobiles/Jaguar-Land-Rover-to-soon-run-on-Tata-Motors-engineering/articleshow/5996626.cms

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Honda1 Unions were needed back in the early days, not needed know. There are plenty of rules and regulations and government agencies that keep companies in line. It's just a money grad and nothing more. Fain is a punk!
1995 SC If the necessary number of employees vote to unionize then yes, they should be unionized. That's how it works.
Sobhuza Trooper That Dave Thomas fella sounds like the kind of twit who is oh-so-quick to tell us how easy and fun the bus is for any and all of your personal transportation needs. The time to get to and from the bus stop is never a concern. The time waiting for the bus is never a concern. The time waiting for a connection (if there is one) is never a concern. The weather is never a concern. Whatever you might be carrying or intend to purchase is never a concern. Nope, Boo Cars! Yeah Buses! Buses rule!Needless to say, these twits don't actual take the damn bus.
MaintenanceCosts Nobody here seems to acknowledge that there are multiple use cases for cars.Some people spend all their time driving all over the country and need every mile and minute of time savings. ICE cars are better for them right now.Some people only drive locally and fly when they travel. For them, there's probably a range number that works, and they don't really need more. For the uses for which we use our EV, that would be around 150 miles. The other thing about a low range requirement is it can make 120V charging viable. If you don't drive more than an average of about 40 miles/day, you can probably get enough electrons through a wall outlet. We spent over two years charging our Bolt only through 120V, while our house was getting rebuilt, and never had an issue.Those are extremes. There are all sorts of use cases in between, which probably represent the majority of drivers. For some users, what's needed is more range. But I think for most users, what's needed is better charging. Retrofit apartment garages like Tim's with 240V outlets at every spot. Install more L3 chargers in supermarket parking lots and alongside gas stations. Make chargers that work like Tesla Superchargers as ubiquitous as gas stations, and EV charging will not be an issue for most users.
MaintenanceCosts I don't have an opinion on whether any one plant unionizing is the right answer, but the employees sure need to have the right to organize. Unions or the credible threat of unionization are the only thing, history has proven, that can keep employers honest. Without it, we've seen over and over, the employers have complete power over the workers and feel free to exploit the workers however they see fit. (And don't tell me "oh, the workers can just leave" - in an oligopolistic industry, working conditions quickly converge, and there's not another employer right around the corner.)