Geely's Volvo Plans Revealed, VW's Jacoby Becomes Volvo CEO

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

What are Geely’s plans for Volvo? Which cars will be built? Where and when? How many? Who will run the show? Where is the money coming from? These are just some of the questions government regulators want to know before they put their stamp of approval under the deal. We are not just talking Chinese regulators. European regulators need to give their nod also. For that, they need Geely’s plans. Some of them were leaked. Some of the leakage is quite explosive.

In March 2010, Geely signed a much publicized deal with Ford to take over their Volvo unit for $1.8 billion. The deal hasn’t closed yet. Volvo is still being operated by Ford. The deal needs approval in Brussels and in Beijing, and money needs to change hands. Both has not happened yet.

However, Geely has prepared a 5 year plan “to make the Volvo brand one of the successful and profitable luxury car brands in China’s auto market,” says Gasgoo. Here are the most salient point, according to the “person familiar with the matter.”

  • Geely’s Li Shufu expects that Volvo is profitable in two years.
  • By 2015, Volvo wants to sell 150,000 units in China alone.
  • Geely will expand the Volvo line-up with more Volvo vehicles to increase the Volvo sedan sales in China.
  • In Q3/2010, the Volvo XC60 will be produced in China
  • The Volvo S60 sedan will start production in China in Q2/2011
  • Chinese production of the Volvo S40 sedan will be halted the same person revealed.
  • The future site for the Chinese Volvo plant has not been chosen. Beijing, Ningbo, Chengdu and Shanghai compete.

As far as the future location goes, there is a new development. Reuters reports that the Chinese regional asset manager Daqing State Asset Operation Co. will be taking a minority position in the new Volvo company. The exact size of the stake taken by Daqing and financing issues will not be unveiled until the deal is closed, said Anders Fogel, Swedish spokesman for Geely. Geely will remain Volvo’s controlling shareholder. Daqing is based in the Heilongjiang Province, in China’s old Manchuria rust belt, near Harbin. Officially, it remains open whether the investment comes with the proviso that the Volvos will be built in the area. Inofficially, it’s unlikely that a small town in an inhospitable corner of China drops serious money on Volvo just to invest their money.

The city of Daqing is brand new, it was founded in 1959 to house workers extracting oil and gas from the Daqing oilfield, and is home to approximately 3 million people. A village by Chinese standards. A few months ago, it got its own airport. However, Daqing comes highly recommended. “Learn from Daqing in industry” was a slogan by Mao Zedong.

If Volvo moves to Daqing, Swedish Volvo personnel should feel quite at home. The winters in the province that shares a border with Siberia can be more brutal than in Sweden.

And who will lead the brand? It will be someone who is familiar with Europe, America, and China: According to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Geely lured Stefan Jacoby away from his job as President of Volkswagen of America. Jacoby had been Controller at Volkswagen Audi Nippon KK in Japan. From 1997 to 2001, he was responsible board member for Asia-Pacific at Volkswagen. After stint as head of Mitsubishi Europe, he returned to Volkswagen and was made CEO of the VWoA in 2007. Geely could hardly find someone more qualified and with more knowledge of markets and plans. The FAZ must have the information from someone intimately familiar with the matter. They already know that the Daqing group will take 37 percent of Volvo.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
 5 comments
  • Eggsalad Eggsalad on Jun 25, 2010

    I will pay up to US$40,000 for a brand-new Volvo 245. Are you listening, Geely??

    • See 2 previous
    • ChuckR ChuckR on Jun 25, 2010
      I will pay up to US$4000 for a brand-new Volvo 245. Are you listening, Geely?? Fixed for you. Come on, the Chinese advantage is cheapness....
  • Mpresley Mpresley on Jun 25, 2010

    Good news for Jacoby. That way, when his predictions of massive US growth do not materialize, it won't be his problem.

  • Theflyersfan I know given the body style they'll sell dozens, but for those of us who grew up wanting a nice Prelude Si with 4WS but our student budgets said no way, it'd be interesting to see if Honda can persuade GenX-ers to open their wallets for one. Civic Type-R powertrain in a coupe body style? Mild hybrid if they have to? The holy grail will still be if Honda gives the ultimate middle finger towards all things EV and hybrid, hides a few engineers in the basement away from spy cameras and leaks, comes up with a limited run of 9,000 rpm engines and gives us the last gasp of the S2000 once again. A send off to remind us of when once they screamed before everything sounds like a whirring appliance.
  • Jeff Nice concept car. One can only dream.
  • Funky D The problem is not exclusively the cost of the vehicle. The problem is that there are too few use cases for BEVs that couldn't be done by a plug-in hybrid, with the latter having the ability to do long-range trips without requiring lengthy recharging and being better able to function in really cold climates.In our particular case, a plug-in hybrid would run in all electric mode for the vast majority of the miles we would drive on a regular basis. It would also charge faster and the battery replacement should be less expensive than its BEV counterpart.So the answer for me is a polite, but firm NO.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic 2012 Ford Escape V6 FWD at 147k miles:Just went thru a heavy maintenance cycle: full brake job with rotors and drums, replace top & bottom radiator hoses, radiator flush, transmission flush, replace valve cover gaskets (still leaks oil, but not as bad as before), & fan belt. Also, #4 fuel injector locked up. About $4.5k spread over 19 months. Sole means of transportation, so don't mind spending the money for reliability. Was going to replace prior to the above maintenance cycle, but COVID screwed up the market ( $4k markup over sticker including $400 for nitrogen in the tires), so bit the bullet. Now serious about replacing, but waiting for used and/or new car prices to fall a bit more. Have my eye on a particular SUV. Last I checked, had a $2.5k discount with great interest rate (better than my CU) for financing. Will keep on driving Escape as long as A/C works. đźš—đźš—đźš—
  • Rna65689660 For such a flat surface, why not get smoke tint, Rtint or Rvynil. Starts at $8. I used to use a company called Lamin-x, but I think they are gone. Has held up great.
Next