Chinese Catfight: BAIC Blocks Daimler's Dalliances With BYD

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Ah, there’s nothing like a good old Chinese catfight over a foreign joint venture partner. Daimler’s Chinese partner BAIC (they build the E-Class and C-Class in Beijing) became increasingly green-eyed watching Daimler playing footsie with up-start BYD. Now, BAIC is throwing a fit.

Gasgoo says that BAIC might withdraw from or delay its planned acquisition of Fujian Daimler, and this could frustrate Daimler’s partnership with BYD. Why is that?

On May 27. BYD and Daimler signed an agreement to develop an all electric vehicle “specific to the requirements of the Chinese market.” Like all joint ventures that could include a car-manufacturing plant, it needs the Chinese government’s regulatory approval.

Write this down, you might learn something: A foreign automaker is only allowed to be party to two auto-making joint ventures in China. Promiscuous Daimler already has two. There is Beijing Benz-DaimlerChrysler Automotive Co., Ltd. (Beijing Benz, a venture with BAIC), and there is Fujian Daimler Automotive Co., Ltd. (a venture with Fujian Motors and Taiwan’s China Motors). The idea was that BAIC buys Fujian Daimler, so that the coast is clear for further Daimler dalliances with BYD.

Suddenly, there are “problems.” Earlier this month, Chinese media reported that Beijing Auto and Fujian Daimler are at an impasse over money and doubts whether buying Fujian Daimler’s is a good idea. Now, there is talk in Beijing that BAIC could derail the whole arrangement. As long as BAIC pouts, Daimler can’t close the deal with BYD. Selling the JV to someone else is no option, as long as Daimler stays in.

Fujian Daimler was created in 2008 as a joint venture with Fujian Motors Group (FJMG) and Taiwan-based China Motors Corp (CMC). The company was created to produce Mercedes-Benz multi-purpose vehicles (MPVs) such as Vito, Sprinter and more. In April 2010, the first Mercedes-Benz Viano transporter rolled off the new production line in Fuzhou. You don’t just walk away from something like that to build cars that run on batteries.

And let’s not forget: BAIC is (through a mesh of holdings) basic ally owned by the Municipality of Beijing, and you know who runs that place. You want them on your good side if you plan on a long and prosperous business in China, one of Daimler’s most important markets, not to mention largest market of their imported S-Class.

(PS: While there are plenty of videos showing violent Shanghai women – or this one from Singapore – there is no footage from Beijing. Beijing ladies are known for their snottiness and poise, but they’d never do that. They’d hire someone.)

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
  • Arthur Dailey We have a lease coming due in October and no intention of buying the vehicle when the lease is up.Trying to decide on a replacement vehicle our preferences are the Maverick, Subaru Forester and Mazda CX-5 or CX-30.Unfortunately both the Maverick and Subaru are thin on the ground. Would prefer a Maverick with the hybrid, but the wife has 2 'must haves' those being heated seats and blind spot monitoring. That requires a factory order on the Maverick bringing Canadian price in the mid $40k range, and a delivery time of TBD. For the Subaru it looks like we would have to go up 2 trim levels to get those and that also puts it into the mid $40k range.Therefore are contemplating take another 2 or 3 year lease. Hoping that vehicle supply and prices stabilize and purchasing a hybrid or electric when that lease expires. By then we will both be retired, so that vehicle could be a 'forever car'. Any recommendations would be welcomed.
  • Eric Wait! They're moving? Mexico??!!
  • GrumpyOldMan All modern road vehicles have tachometers in RPM X 1000. I've often wondered if that is a nanny-state regulation to prevent drivers from confusing it with the speedometer. If so, the Ford retro gauges would appear to be illegal.
  • Theflyersfan Matthew...read my mind. Those old Probe digital gauges were the best 80s digital gauges out there! (Maybe the first C4 Corvettes would match it...and then the strange Subaru XT ones - OK, the 80s had some interesting digital clusters!) I understand the "why simulate real gauges instead of installing real ones?" argument and it makes sense. On the other hand, with the total onslaught of driver's aid and information now, these screens make sense as all of that info isn't crammed into a small digital cluster between the speedo and tach. If only automakers found a way to get over the fallen over Monolith stuck on the dash design motif. Ultra low effort there guys. And I would have loved to have seen a retro-Mustang, especially Fox body, have an engine that could rev out to 8,000 rpms! You'd likely be picking out metal fragments from pretty much everywhere all weekend long.
  • Analoggrotto What the hell kind of news is this?
Next