Honda Breaks Stride, Delays Civic Redesign
Honda hasn’t always replaced its bread-and-butter compact, the Civic, every five years. The Mk.1 Civic soldiered from 1972 until 1979. The second through fifth generations were replaced on a regular four-year schedule, before Honda settled into a five-year product cadence with the sixth generation (1996-2000). If it were to keep with that cadence, we’d be seeing a ninth-generation Civic sometime this year, replacing the Mk.VIII, which debuted in late 2005. According to Automotive News [sub], however, Honda is holding off on releasing a new Civic until 2011. What gives?
American Honda’s Executive VP John Mendel explains… sort of:
In general, we are not changing cycles. We change vehicles as need be. The ability to do something based on more current information is better than waiting a full model cycle. Some of that is being able to have the opportunity to change [based on] what you see happening in the marketplace.
But behind the confused corporate jibber-jabber lies a far more reassuring sign: according to Honda’s COO Tsuneo Tanai, the Mk.IX Civic was supposed to be larger than the current model, but was redesigned to be close to the current model’s size “mid-stream,” causing the delay. Breaking product cadence might seem a bit un-Honda, but its vehicles were also growing to distinctly un-Honda-like sizes as well. Sometimes you have to break one tradition to bring back another.
More by Edward Niedermeyer
Comments
Join the conversation
If I'm not mistaken the Civic is not only the #1 seller in its segment it's also the best selling car in the country or second best. At that rate a one year delay for the new one shouldn't be much of a problem. To each his own but I've always thought the current model was ugly, not that I wouldn't buy one but the styling to me is a big negative. Honda needs to remember in the case of the Civic the reason so many people buy them is they want a car that size not a larger one.
I was going to trade my 2005 Civic sedan on a 2009 Civic sedan last year but found the following design problems: -new dash layout is stupid, simple analog is best -loss of headroom particularly in rear (6'2" yet comfortable in rear of 2005 but couldn't straighten up in 2009) -prefer roll down windows and less gadgets -weak braking on 2009 (severe fading) -new engine and transmission seem whiney and hard shifting I think a re-design closer in size to the 2001-2005 era's size would suit most buyer's better.
How about just coming out with a new Civic that is same size but weighs less? for better fuel economy, better handling, performance. Next thing we'll be hearing is that it needs a V6. Like the TSX, adding a V6 adds weight and spoils handling. Acura had a perfectly good V6 car already - the TL. Make new models lighter.
Nobody sees the Civic delay as a reaction to the underwhelming new Insight?