Europe In April 2010: Down 7.4 Percent

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

The European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association ACEA released sales numbers for April. As predicted on Friday, the numbers are bad. For the first time this year, and for the first time in 10 months, numbers are negative. New passenger car registrations in Europe fell by 7.4 percent in April compared to the same month last year. They will get worse.

Percentage-wise, the decline in April registrations is a by-product of the cash for clunkers upturn last year. Led by Germany, more and more countries jumped on the bandwagon, with considerable effect (see chart.) More and more European countries have either ended or are phasing out the incentives for putting aging cars out of their misery.

It had been widely expected that sales will be down in 2010 compared to the government-enhanced numbers of 2009. For the rest of 2010, the negative numbers will get higher and higher, as we are comparing to a higher and higher base.

More disconcerting is the fact that for the first 4 months, EU car sales are already 11.6 percent below pre-crisis levels in the same period of 2008. Also, some markets still have scrapping programs, or show the decaying effect of just terminated programs. Once all of Europe has been weaned off the clunker steroids, the market will look miserable for quite some while.

With the drug highs mostly gone, a bleak new normalcy is setting in. In April, Germany was again Europe’s largest market with 259,414 units, despite new registrations falling by 31.7 percent. #2 on the podium: France. Italy.

By manufacturer in the 27 countries of the EU, the Volkswagen Group remains the unassailable leader with a 22 percent market share. PSA Group is in second position with a 13.9 percent market share, followed by Renault Group with a 10.5 percent share. Ford is 4th with a 9.4 percent share.

Speaking of Ford, there most likely are huge regrets in Cologne for embarking on the silly “largest brand in Europe” PR gamble. It’s coming to haunt them. In the EU 27, the Ford brand is now in 4th position after Volkswagen, Renault and Peugeot. On a brand level, Ford lost 19.6 percent in the EU 27, nearly three points more than the 17 percent they had (not really) admitted on Friday, for a Europe 19 that doesn’t exist. If they wouldn’t have made outrageous claims, this would have fallen under the table. Toyota (-21.3 percent), Suzuki (-26.3 percent) and Honda (-28.1 percent) have worse numbers. A much better PR strategy for Ford would have been to tout their #4 ranking as a manufacturer, a respectable showing. What helped the Ford Group was a surprising 35.2 percent rise in Volvo registrations all over Europe. Volvo still belongs to and counts for Ford until the deal with Geely closes. Without Volvo, Ford would be in the #7 slot on a group level, behind GM and Fiat.

Detailed numbers are available as PDF and in Excel format for your number crunching pleasure.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
  • Ronin It's one thing to stay tried and true to loyal past customers; you'll ensure a stream of revenue from your installed base- maybe every several years or so.It's another to attract net-new customers, who are dazzled by so many other attractive offerings that have more cargo capacity than that high-floored 4-Runner bed, and are not so scrunched in scrunchy front seats.Like with the FJ Cruiser: don't bother to update it, thereby saving money while explaining customers like it that way, all the way into oblivion. Not recognizing some customers like to actually have right rear visibility in their SUVs.
  • MaintenanceCosts It's not a Benz or a Jag / it's a 5-0 with a rag /And I don't wanna brag / but I could never be stag
  • 3-On-The-Tree Son has a 2016 Mustang GT 5.0 and I have a 2009 C6 Corvette LS3 6spd. And on paper they are pretty close.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Same as the Land Cruiser, emissions. I have a 1985 FJ60 Land Cruiser and it’s a beast off-roading.
  • CanadaCraig I would like for this anniversary special to be a bare-bones Plain-Jane model offered in Dynasty Green and Vintage Burgundy.
Next