By on May 14, 2010

Officials working with the Department of Energy tell the Detroit News that GM and Chrysler face no major obstacles in their quest for huge retooling loans from the DOE’s Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Loan program. GM is seeking $14.4b and Chrysler has asked for $8.55b in low-cost government loans. Says Matt Rogers, a senior adviser to the Energy Department

Project finance details need to be worked through, but those things are working out just fine as we work directly with the companies. It’s really a process of making sure that each of the projects that they have are in fact competitive.

Er, competitive compared to what?

As former Tesla Marketing boss (and frequent ATVML critic) Darryl Siry puts it:
So the guys from the DOE and Booz Allen Hamilton or AT Kearny are trying to judge whether the series hybrid Chevy Volt will be competitive? It certainly will be disadvantaged if you don’t fund it. Why? BECAUSE YOU FUNDED THEIR COMPETITION. Now that you have screwed up the natural forces of the marketplace, the DOE must provide equivalent support for the Volt program and let them compete on a level playing field with Nissan, Ford and even Tesla and Fisker.
And he’s right: All four firms he mentions have received money from the ATVML program, despite qualifying for unproven products. Besides, viability of the Volt program was never the main problem with GM’s bid for DOE loans. The big hangup was a financial viability clause, that GM now undoubtedly passes, having received tens of billions of dollars in direct taxpayer support. If you’re going to help GM over the financial hurdle, why pretend that the Volt’s viability is an issue? Especially when the presidential task force on autos already ripped into the Volt’s chances pre-bailout, only to come to swing back in favor of Chevy’s hail mary.
We’ve known that GM needs this money since last summer, and we’ve contacted the DOE several times trying to follow up on the status of GM and Chrysler’s loan applications. Why this whole process has been so shrouded in mystery is hard to understand, and this secrecy is more than a little troubling considering the impact these decisions have on the industry. But then, that bridge was crossed when the bailout happened… why the DOE is wasting time pretending that it might not give GM and Chrysler the cherry on top of their bailout is tough to fathom.
Get the latest TTAC e-Newsletter!

7 Comments on “DOE Loans In The Works For GM, Chrysler...”


  • avatar
    Rusted Source

    Most of us, with the exception of Mr. Farago, gave Ford (and to a lesser extent Nissan) a pass for the DOE loan, because we agreed it was a loan. If the government now believes that GM and Chrysler will pay back these low interest loans as well then griping about it would create a double standard.

    I’m pretty sure GM is good for the money because they have a track record of paying back loans, in full, with interest, 5 years ahead of the scheduled deadline.

  • avatar
    boyphenom666

    Three comments:

    1. Why are these clowns at GM so in love with pop music soundtracks? It really detracts from both the message and the memorability of the commercial or promo video, or whatever this 4 minute monstrosity is supposed to be.

    2. I tried looking at the commercial from the standpoint of a casual observer. It was boring (I cut it off after about 2 minutes) and it doesn’t really hit home the message of Chevrolet. Who, other than auto junkies, would ever associate that rocket concept car with Chevy?

    3. They really need to read about Stephen Arnold and “sonic branding”. Having your own sonic logo (jingle or music track) really does help hammer the brand home. Everybody remembers the NBC Chimes or the T-Mobile tones, who remembers crappy Top-40 music from 25 years ago and who’s going to associate it with a car?

    For those who didn’t see my rant in another thread, here is an example of an effective commercial, in my way of thinking:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRfarOd7jxw

    This has everything you need in a commercial. It’s memorable, it’s entertaining, it’s got a catchy jingle (sonic branding) and it hammers home product features.

  • avatar
    tparkit

    “Why this whole process has been so shrouded in mystery is hard to understand”

    No, it isn’t. The process is shrouded because it is an act of theft against the taxpayers. Government Motors is a giant slush for funneling money to the UAW and other supporters of the Democratic Party. The Volt program functions as an important sluice for the slush, as well as an alabi: that the political payoff is not graft, it’s an investment in a glowing, high-tech, environmentally responsible future.

  • avatar
    Doc

    I think that the administration will not give more “bailouts” to GM and Chrysler because the public is against it overwhelmingly. However, the failure of either one of these companies would be embarrassing, so a way will be found to funnel tax dollars into these companies. It just will not be called a bailout this time.

  • avatar
    Robert Schwartz

    Sound of grinding teeth.

  • avatar
    geozinger

    Does anybody else find the picture for this post a little disturbing? I’m glad to see it isn’t what I thought it was at first glance…

    No wonder why that Lesko guy is so freakin’ happy all of the time…

  • avatar
    chonralda

    The end of that ad was just a bit too trippy for me…


Back to TopLeave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Subscribe without commenting

Recent Comments

  • Re: Town And Country Update: Road Trip

    nrd515 - A friend of mine is one of those guys who first got married out of high school and had a coupe of kids almost immediately. His mom and her husband live in...
  • Re: Saturation Dive: The GM 8L90 transmission

    SC5door - Until everything else fails around the car. You mention Ultradrive as a jab at Chrysler, yet totally blow off ignition switches, intake gaskets,...
  • Re: New York 2014: Outtakes Part 2 – Expand Your Horizons

    CRConrad - @Chris FOM: “No, the _28 nomenclature was a detuned 3L engine.” Maybe in America, maybe recently elsewhere too. But yes,...
  • Re: Ur-Turn: Need A Lyft?

    tekdemon - The thing is that you get to deduct a pretty hefty deduction on your taxes though so can still work out for you if you drive a lot of miles. I wouldn’t drive...
  • Re: Ur-Turn: Need A Lyft?

    danio3834 - Looking at their website, I’m having trouble figuring out what the exact fees/donations are and what a driver can typically expect to earn. More seating would...
  • Re: Ur-Turn: Need A Lyft?

    tekdemon - Uber drivers definitely double dip, my friend’s gotten a black car the last couple times he used X, and I’ve gotten a huge Denali SUV when I used black (rather...
  • Re: QOTD: The Economics Of Ownership

    danio3834 - The cranks are prescribing as much DIY as feasible for poor people where the economics of doing this does the most to make them less poor. DIYing repairs on an...
  • Re: Ur-Turn: Need A Lyft?

    CRConrad - @7402: “I’ll wait for the first huge civil suit to meander through the appeals system before putting my own car out there.” So you plan on perhaps signing up...
  • Re: New York 2014: Outtakes Part 2 – Expand Your Horizons

    FJ60LandCruiser - I’d rather have a FEW well-executed models than DOZNES of half-assed platform sharing crossovers, wagonoids, and 4...
  • Re: Ur-Turn: Need A Lyft?

    CRConrad - @tankinbeans: “One never knows what kind of crazy lurks out there and I wouldn’t be interested in finding out.” So, you realise Lyft drivers might be...

New Car Research

Get a Free Dealer Quote

Staff

  • Authors

  • Brendan McAleer, Canada
  • Marcelo De Vasconcellos, Brazil
  • Matthias Gasnier, Australia
  • J & J Sutherland, Canada
  • Tycho de Feyter, China
  • W. Christian 'Mental' Ward, Abu Dhabi
  • Mark Stevenson, Canada
  • Faisal Ali Khan, India