Did Toyota Plan Sneak Attack On Capitol Hill?

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Congressional lawmakers are mad at Toyota. What has Toyota done now? Their sin this time: They may have harbored a secret “attack plan against congressional testimony.” This, says the Washington Post, has “drawn the ire of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.”

End of February, the witch-hunt against Toyota definitely had gotten out of hand. ABC News found a Southern Illinois Professor named David Gilbert who demonstrated to a shocked Brian Ross that Toyotas take off on their own if the ghost in the machine is roused. This was conveniently aired a few days before congressional testimony. In which Gilbert testified. A few days later, a man called Jim Sikes could‘t stop his Prius on a San Diego freeway. A housekeeper in a tony suburb of New York City had a runwaway Prius. Toyota had a problem.

The anti-Toyota-league was salivating. The pro-Toyota-league told Toyota to “get in front of the story.” I was asked what I would have recommended, and I truthfully answered: “Wakarimasen” – I have no idea.

Toyota demanded ideas, that’s why they called on the President’s pollster Joel Benenson (he had worked for Toyota for three years before.) They also gave an assignment to the New York PR firm Robinson, Lerer & Montgomery. That company calls itself an expert in “crisis management” and “public policy and regulatory issues.” Their mission: Find out how best to counter the onslaught of bad news.

However, soon their services were superfluous. The problem solved itself. We called shenanigans, saying that “For the Intended Gilbert Acceleration to occur in the wild, several things would have to happen in the exact sequence: First, the isolation for both VPA and VPA2 would have to break down. Then, a connection between VPA and VPA2 would have to be established. Into this connection, a resistance of no less than 50 ohms and no higher than 250 ohms would have to be connected. Once, and only once this connection between VPA and VPA2 has been established through the proper resistor, VPA2 (and not VPA) would have to be connected to +5V. Then, the car would take off.” That went right over everybody’s head.

A day later, Toyota’s technical advisor in these matters, Exponent, came to the same conclusions. That also overwhelmed most of the audience. Should have known better: Nearly half of the Americans believe that ghosts exist. Very few give credence to the existence of VPA and VPA2.

What did ABC in was that they were sloppy in their editing, and that they were called “fakers” by the likes of Gawker. People can indentify with that.

Toyota’s ultimate saviour was the man from San Diego, Jim Sikes . Turned out he had operated a business called Adultswinglife, after he had declared bankruptcy. That was just the tip of the iceberg. Sikes was promptly dubbed “Balloon Boy II”, and when NHTSA and Toyota engineers didn’t find signs the brakes had been applied at full force at high speeds over a sustained period of time, he turned into a lead balloon. A wife-swapping bankrupt real estate agent receives is comeuppance? People eat that up.

The runaway Prius of the New York housekeeper? Pilot error. Camry crashes into wall of YMCA? Driver error. Runaway Prius nearly kills boy? Driver error.

In February/March, any accident involving a Toyota did to the press what blood in the water does for sharks. Now, suddenly, no more unintended acceleration stories. Hot potato. Don’t touch.

The best pollster and the trickiest PR company can’t make that up.

At Toyota, the polling data and possible talking points were quickly filed away. Problem solved. Not for plaintiff lawyers and for Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), the House committee chairman. Both desperately want to keep the story alive. Their latest attempt: They called the polling witness tampering. Lawmakers “would take very seriously any effort to malign or intimidate witnesses who cooperate with our investigations,” a committee spokesman said in a statement, quoted by the Washington Post. Their headline? “Toyota had attack plan against congressional testimony, documents show.” Shades of December 7 …

Toyota’s answer? The cited a letter from Obama’s pollster, submitted to the committee, in which Benenson says that “testing messages to rebut unfair or false assertions is a common and legitimate research practice and is no different than message testing our firm regularly does for Congressional candidates or Congressional campaign committees in response to critics or opponents.”

Good for them. And other than candidates or campaign committees, they didn’t even need to use the research. The matter righted itself.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 11 comments
  • Windswords Windswords on May 17, 2010

    I didn't have the time (or patience) to sit thru the congressional hearings on Toyota. Wasn't the point of Gilbert's experiment on the Toyota to not show that SUA could happen in the real world under those same circumstances in his test, but to show that when an event does happen it does not set a fault code in the ECU? Gilbert is not responsible for how ABC presents their story. He has no editorial control (as anyone who has ever been interviewed by 60 minutes has found out). Remember, one of Toyota's defenses is that after an accident they find nothing wrong with the car or ECU and no fault codes. Did or did not Gilbert say that his experiment wasn't to show how it might happen but that if something did happen it would leave no "fingerprints" for investigators???

    • Bertel Schmitt Bertel Schmitt on May 17, 2010

      His point was that a "short" in the circuitry could cause SUA. Which was thoroughly debunked.

  • Wsn Wsn on May 17, 2010

    If Jim Sikes was hired by a PR company, that would be brilliant.

  • MaintenanceCosts It's not a Benz or a Jag / it's a 5-0 with a rag /And I don't wanna brag / but I could never be stag
  • 3-On-The-Tree Son has a 2016 Mustang GT 5.0 and I have a 2009 C6 Corvette LS3 6spd. And on paper they are pretty close.
  • 3-On-The-Tree Same as the Land Cruiser, emissions. I have a 1985 FJ60 Land Cruiser and it’s a beast off-roading.
  • CanadaCraig I would like for this anniversary special to be a bare-bones Plain-Jane model offered in Dynasty Green and Vintage Burgundy.
  • ToolGuy Ford is good at drifting all right... 😉
Next