Daimler And BYD Ink Joint Venture Contract

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

Someone is in a big hurry: In March, Daimler and BYD signed an agreement to develop an all electric vehicle “specific to the requirements of the Chinese market.” Usually, it takes a while until something comes from these announcements, especially in China, where everything needs a lot of big red chops. Much to our surprise, we hear that BYD and Daimler signed the contract today to form a 50:50 joint venture for the aforementioned purpose.

According to Gasgoo, the contract was signed today in Beijing by Dieter Zetsche and BYD Chairman Wang Chuanfu. Both believe that China will become one of the world’s largest markets for all-electric vehicles.

Note that this is not a contract to build one, but to develop one. For that purpose, a research and technology center going by the name of Shenzhen BYD Daimler New Technology Co. will be founded. Not surprisingly, it will be located in Shenzhen, where BYD is headquartered.

As both companies are not starting from scratch, development is expected to be fast. Couple battery and powertrain used in BYD’s e6 with Daimler’s car building prowess, and hopefully, the baby will be ready for the world market when it’s grown up.

Signaling that both are well ahead, a Daimler executive whispered at the sidelines of today’s event that Daimler and BYD might already display a prototype of the jointly developed all-electric car at the Paris auto show in October. So building a car shouldn’t be too far off.

Now wait: Didn’t Daimler also buy 10 percent of Tesla? Didn’t Toyota drop money and Nummi into Tesla? Weren’t there rumors about flirtations between Toyota and Daimler about hydrogen-propelled cars? The world of alternate propulsions is getting more complicated than it deserves.

Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Syke Syke on May 27, 2010

    Obviously lots of companies are playing CYA in all sorts of directions. Fifteen years from now, the automotive history of this period is going to make very interesting reading.

  • AJ AJ on May 27, 2010

    50:50? BYD must have some cash Daimler can raid.

  • ToolGuy First picture: I realize that opinions vary on the height of modern trucks, but that entry door on the building is 80 inches tall and hits just below the headlights. Does anyone really believe this is reasonable?Second picture: I do not believe that is a good parking spot to be able to access the bed storage. More specifically, how do you plan to unload topsoil with the truck parked like that? Maybe you kids are taller than me.
  • ToolGuy The other day I attempted to check the engine oil in one of my old embarrassing vehicles and I guess the red shop towel I used wasn't genuine Snap-on (lots of counterfeits floating around) plus my driveway isn't completely level and long story short, the engine seized 3 minutes later.No more used cars for me, and nothing but dealer service from here on in (the journalists were right).
  • Doughboy Wow, Merc knocks it out of the park with their naming convention… again. /s
  • Doughboy I’ve seen car bras before, but never car beards. ZZ Top would be proud.
  • Bkojote Allright, actual person who knows trucks here, the article gets it a bit wrong.First off, the Maverick is not at all comparable to a Tacoma just because they're both Hybrids. Or lemme be blunt, the butch-est non-hybrid Maverick Tremor is suitable for 2/10 difficulty trails, a Trailhunter is for about 5/10 or maybe 6/10, just about the upper end of any stock vehicle you're buying from the factory. Aside from a Sasquatch Bronco or Rubicon Jeep Wrangler you're looking at something you're towing back if you want more capability (or perhaps something you /wish/ you were towing back.)Now, where the real world difference should play out is on the trail, where a lot of low speed crawling usually saps efficiency, especially when loaded to the gills. Real world MPG from a 4Runner is about 12-13mpg, So if this loaded-with-overlander-catalog Trailhunter is still pulling in the 20's - or even 18-19, that's a massive improvement.
Next