Colorado Senate Approves $25k/Day Fines For Dealer Reinstatement Law

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

The Denver Business Journal reports that the Colorado Senate has approved fines of $10,000-$25,000 per day for any automaker that does not comply with its law (HB-1049) requiring reinstatement or compensation of culled dealers. That law was passed earlier this year, drawing a $60,000 vote-no lobbying effort from GM. It also gives culled dealers the right of first refusal for new franchises opened within five miles of their shut dealership within five years, and states that if a franchise has been re-awarded, the culled dealer can demand the return of his franchise. According to the DBJ:

Three terminated Chrysler dealers requested their re-awarded franchises back after the law was signed and said they were told by the company that it had no intentions of complying with it. Chrysler then filed a federal lawsuit on April 23 against Colorado, claiming the new law contradicted terms laid out in Chrysler’s bankruptcy agreement and violates the contract clauses in the state and federal constitutions.

Chrysler’s statement on the matter:

The actions to reduce Chrysler Group’s dealer network were a necessary part of Chrysler Group’s viability and central to the interim financing and proposed partnership with Fiat. The company is confident that we will prevail on the merits based upon federal orders entered by the Bankruptcy Court.

According to Automotive News [sub] though, Chrysler has recently moved away from its combative stance towards culled dealers, and is beginning to offer settlements in some cases facing arbitration.

Four Chrysler dealer lawyers and a dealer activist said they know of about 18 closed dealerships that have received offers since Tuesday, April 27.

Most of these offers have been for $25,000, with the range stretching from $20,000 to $200,000, they said. At least half the Chrysler dealers who received offers have rejected them, they say.

With daily fines for non-compliance in Colorado equaling “most” of Chrysler’s settlement costs, there is a definite incentive for settling these cases. And the price tag certainly just went a little higher.

Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • OldandSlow OldandSlow on May 04, 2010

    Lobbyists for car dealers +1 State law makers in Colorado -1 I doubt that this legislation will survive very long in Federal Court.

  • Daga Daga on May 04, 2010

    So where is the law requiring all fired employees (without cause, i.e., downsized) be offered first dibs on new hirings? How do these lawmakers actually defend themselves when they do this kind of crap? I'm continually amazed that the press has given dealers a pass on the stuff they are pulling. Most people don't like car salesmen, they don't like when groups that give lots of money to lawmakers get preferential treatment and don't like entitlement arguements. So where are the pitchforks? /end rant

  • AZFelix Hilux technical, preferably with a swivel mount.
  • ToolGuy This is the kind of thing you get when you give people faster internet.
  • ToolGuy North America is already the greatest country on the planet, and I have learned to be careful about what I wish for in terms of making changes. I mean, if Greenland wants to buy JDM vehicles, isn't that for the Danes to decide?
  • ToolGuy Once again my home did not catch on fire and my fire extinguisher(s) stayed in the closet, unused. I guess I threw my money away on fire extinguishers.(And by fire extinguishers I mean nuclear missiles.)
  • Carson D The UAW has succeeded in organizing a US VW plant before. There's a reason they don't teach history in the schools any longer. People wouldn't make the same mistakes.
Next