What's Wrong With This Picture: Volt Lumina Edition

Edward Niedermeyer
by Edward Niedermeyer

Patent drawings of what appears to be a compact/subcompact MPV bearing the Chevy Volt’s grille have surfaced at GMInsidenews, setting off much speculation as to what it all means. And boy is there room to speculate. Initial impressions are of a Chevy Orlando/ Buick Granite with a Volt-alike grille, but upon closer inspection the line drawings appear to show a smaller vehicle. After all, Orlando is supposed to offer a seven passenger option, and it’s hard to imagine sitting aft of those rear doors. And yet the Volt drivetrain was built around GM’s Delta II platform, which underpins both the Orlando and Granite (in concept); why would GM downsize its expensive EREV to the Aveo’s Gamma II platform before building out Delta II variants?

Other speculation: this is simply a five-door Volt, which is being developed specifically to address the Volt’s lack of five-place seating. Or maybe it’s an EV-only hatchback aimed at a more Leaf-like price point than the Volt’s $40k-ish. One thing is certain: GM is already moving towards a lineup that’s heavy on compact crossover/MPVs like this one. Unless this replaces a planned Buick-branded, plug-in Gamma II-based MPV, there’s overlap breaking out all over. Besides, isn’t it starting to look like GM is turning Volt into a new brand? For a former branding addict, straight out of a government bankruptcy rehab, this is a dangerous sign…



Edward Niedermeyer
Edward Niedermeyer

More by Edward Niedermeyer

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 3 comments
  • Philadlj Philadlj on Apr 20, 2010

    As far as 5-doors go, here's your choice so far from GM: Small: Aveo5 Medium: Terrain, Equinox, SRX, CTS wagon Large: Traverse, Enclave, Acadia In 2-3 years: Small: Spark, Aveo5, Orlando, Granite, Rendezvous*, Volt5* Medium: Terrain, Equinox, SRX, CTS wagon, Regal wagon* Large: Traverse, Enclave, Acadia, Lambdalade* That's a lotta hatchbacks!

  • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Apr 20, 2010

    Like a hole in the head, we need that.

  • Buickman I like it!
  • JMII Hyundai Santa Cruz, which doesn't do "truck" things as well as the Maverick does.How so? I see this repeated often with no reference to exactly what it does better.As a Santa Cruz owner the only things the Mav does better is price on lower trims and fuel economy with the hybrid. The Mav's bed is a bit bigger but only when the SC has the roll-top bed cover, without this they are the same size. The Mav has an off road package and a towing package the SC lacks but these are just some parts differences. And even with the tow package the Hyundai is rated to tow 1,000lbs more then the Ford. The SC now has XRT trim that beefs up the looks if your into the off-roader vibe. As both vehicles are soft-roaders neither are rock crawling just because of some extra bits Ford tacked on.I'm still loving my SC (at 9k in mileage). I don't see any advantages to the Ford when you are looking at the medium to top end trims of both vehicles. If you want to save money and gas then the Ford becomes the right choice. You will get a cheaper interior but many are fine with this, especially if don't like the all touch controls on the SC. However this has been changed in the '25 models in which buttons and knobs have returned.
  • Analoggrotto I'd feel proper silly staring at an LCD pretending to be real gauges.
  • Gray gm should hang their wimpy logo on a strip mall next to Saul Goodman's office.
  • 1995 SC No
Next